When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I just got the latest nav Disc. What's ironic is that after waiting 4 months to get it, it doesn't have my home address i(street) in it...And no, I don't leave out in no where.
Anyway, on to my question - while I was playing around with the nav controls, I pushed calibration - location. I know that tells the nav system where it is, but I know I hit calibration int he wrong location - if that makes sense. Bottom line is, how do I reset the location so that it just checks the gps and has me there?
If I remove the nav disc and then re-insert it, willt hat do it?
On a lighter note, I have Nav Disc 3.0 that is available for $5.00 shipped priority.
Cheers,
Ray
You can't really hit calibration in a "wrong location". Calibration allows you to sync the GPS/Nav to your current physical location and orientation as these can become skewed for various reasons according to the manual.
If the car is sitting on a known location and the GPS does not agree with either the location or orientation (compass bearing), you can adjust both those values.
No, I don't believe taking the DVD out will reset that, but all you have to do is another cal.
FYI for everyone, a few weeks ago, mine went nuts all of a sudden, thinking I was about 70 miles away from where I really was. Seconds before it was fine. I had to do the calibrate to get it back to where I really was. Still no clue what happened. Not trying to steal the thread but thinking it might be related in some strange way.
FYI for everyone, a few weeks ago, mine went nuts all of a sudden, thinking I was about 70 miles away from where I really was. Seconds before it was fine. I had to do the calibrate to get it back to where I really was. Still no clue what happened. Not trying to steal the thread but thinking it might be related in some strange way.
An article in the journals.cambridge.org says that spurious errors can occur for various reasons. Sounds like you found one