When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was in the Chevrolet garage yesterday, there is a 2007 vette in for repairs. It has soft camshaft lobes. The car has 36,000 miles. How many others are out there with potential camshaft problems?
Paul
I don't know what soft cam lobes are? Was there any further explanation/definition? First time I've read of it here, so I'd guess no, it's not a big or frequent thing/occurrence.
Oh yes absoutely!!! My 05 had a soft factory cam, and I suspect that there are many many more out there. The clue to me was subtle lifter noise around 2,000 RPM. Mine became evident at approx. 45,000 miles. Here's a pic to prove there was a problem. What was more dissapointing was that GM was not willing to admit there was a problem and give me a break on the repairs. Although I had proof of maint. records etc, I had to pay 5k out of my pocket for repairs. Kind of reminds me of the frustration I went through with the Chevy Vega I bought new in 1973... :
Last edited by Jimbeaux; Aug 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM.
I was in the Chevrolet garage yesterday, there is a 2007 vette in for repairs. It has soft camshaft lobes. The car has 36,000 miles. How many others are out there with potential camshaft problems?
Paul
[B][SIZE="2"]Oh yes absoutely!!! My 05 had a soft factory cam, and I suspect that there are many many more out there. The clue to me was subtle lifter noise around 2,000 RPM. Mine became evident at approx. 45,000 miles. Here's a pic to prove there was a problem.
Just my opinion, but I doubt your cam in your photo was due to improper heat treat. This type of damage looks like an engine that was stored where the lifter roller corroded to the cam lobe. Leaving old oil in the crankcase before storage can do this.
A soft cam improper heat treat would have happen much sooner than 45K miles. A soft cam looks like this photo and this one happen with only about 3K miles.
Just my opinion, but I doubt your cam in your photo was due to improper heat treat. This type of damage looks like an engine that was stored where the lifter roller corroded to the cam lobe. Leaving old oil in the crankcase before storage can do this.
A soft cam improper heat treat would have happen much sooner than 45K miles. A soft cam looks like this photo and this one happen with only about 3K miles.
Nope I disagree. Other lobes were pitted. The car was never stored. I bought it brand new in 05 with nine miles on it. It has been my daily driver from day one. Right now it has over 103,000 miles on it.
Last edited by Jimbeaux; Aug 22, 2010 at 12:37 AM.
I manufacture cams for a living. They are not for the Auto industry but for automated machinery from can seaming to packaging machinery etc.
The first photo looks to me to be a failure from too hard a cam surface. I know this seems strange but when the hardening process is not tempered properly the steel becomes too brittle and chucks of steel falling out as seen the in first picture can result. I have had failures just like this in our products . When the cam surface is too hard and the tempering process was not done correctly.
The sencond photo is typical of a cam surface that is soft. The scoring is typical of wear marks.
I manufacture cams for a living. They are not for the Auto industry but for automated machinery from can seaming to packaging machinery etc.
The first photo looks to me to be a failure from too hard a cam surface. I know this seems strange but when the hardening process is not tempered properly the steel becomes too brittle and chucks of steel falling out as seen the in first picture can result. I have had failures just like this in our products . When the cam surface is too hard and the tempering process was not done correctly.
The sencond photo is typical of a cam surface that is soft. The scoring is typical of wear marks.
Either too soft or too hard, the end result is camshaft failure and the need to replace.
Thanks all.
Not much to worry about I see. I did not ask if the camshaft was OEM or aftermarket. The way the discussion went I assumed the shaft was OEM. Over the years and I have heard about "soft cams" and having had one, I thought here I go again.
Oh yes absoutely!!! My 05 had a soft factory cam, and I suspect that there are many many more out there. The clue to me was subtle lifter noise around 2,000 RPM. Mine became evident at approx. 45,000 miles. Here's a pic to prove there was a problem. What was more dissapointing was that GM was not willing to admit there was a problem and give me a break on the repairs. Although I had proof of maint. records etc, I had to pay 5k out of my pocket for repairs. Kind of reminds me of the frustration I went through with the Chevy Vega I bought new in 1973... :
GM warranty, that's what keeps me from buying a new Corvette.
very interesting discussion. I've never seen one with chunks out of the lobe itself but I have seen excessive scoring and significant wear, usually in race cams. But it can happen to stock cams. Thanks for the photos and explanations from all, a learning experience for sure.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16,'17,'18-'19-'20-'21-'22
Originally Posted by Jimbeaux
Nope I disagree. Other lobes were pitted. The car was never stored. I bought it brand new in 05 with nine miles on it. It has been my daily driver from day one. Right now it has over 103,000 miles on it.
Every lobe has a roller lifter sitting on it, so if there were corrosive conditions you should expect multiple pitted lobes. The car may have been sitting on the dealer lot since Sept of 2004 before you bought it.
Flat tappets are much crueler to camshafts, and required copious amounts of ZnDP to make them live.
Every lobe has a roller lifter sitting on it, so if there were corrosive conditions you should expect multiple pitted lobes. The car may have been sitting on the dealer lot since Sept of 2004 before you bought it.
Flat tappets are much crueler to camshafts, and required copious amounts of ZnDP to make them live.
Nope, the car came off the Assembly in June of 05. I purchased it from the dealer in August of 05. That was the only lobe in that condition. Some over lobes had what looked like pock marks over a wider area. I believe there was a problem with the hardening process in this particular cam.