When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was going to purchase a snell 2010 racing helmet. I was wondering what is the best bang for the buck. I see there are a lot of choises out there, and just want one that fits well and is comfortable. I will be racing my 2010 GS at an NHRA sanctioned track. Any help is appreciated
I was going to purchase a snell 2010 racing helmet. I was wondering what is the best bang for the buck. I see there are a lot of choises out there, and just want one that fits well and is comfortable. I will be racing my 2010 GS at an NHRA sanctioned track. Any help is appreciated
Helmets are a very personal choice, IMHO. Go try them on and select whatever you like the fit, feel and look of, and don't fret price. I would not pay for fancy paint jobs myself. A plain white helmet works just fine.
Just remember, that's your one and only head in the thing.
No need to spend a lot. I still use my $70 motorcycle open faced helmet at test and tunes. I use my SA when required. Get something that fits since you may be wearing it for extended periods.
The Impact 1320 is a popular helmet with the dirt track racers. Just $295 for a full face helmet that has provisions for HANS attachments. Mine fits well, is comfortable and will do the job required if I ever need it to.
There are some really nice helmets that are lighter in weight and that have ear muffs inside so outside sounds are muffled and allow you to hear an intercom or radio speaker if your helmet is so equipped. However, the ones I was looking at started at $800 with the top model going for $3K.
If you've got a $50 head put a $50 helmet on it!! You get my point?
We've always used that saying. However, I think it was much more appropriate years ago when we were all buying motorcylce helmets that were DOT certified (a low bar) and nothing more. Today it's a bit of a different story. All SA2010 helmets passed the same comprehensive safety test, and meet the standards. That doesn't mean that some don't offer more protection than the standards, it is just we don't have anyway of knowing, it probably isn't necessary, and price probably isn't a good indicator. Price for SA2010 helmets are likely driven by by weight of the materials, ventalation, style, quality of non safety materials, etc.
So as others have said, buy one that is comfortable and meets your needs.
I was going to purchase a snell 2010 racing helmet. I was wondering what is the best bang for the buck. I see there are a lot of choises out there, and just want one that fits well and is comfortable. I will be racing my 2010 GS at an NHRA sanctioned track. Any help is appreciated
Put a lot of thought into it.. remember a "Full Face" will give you more protection than an Open Face...... That being said... I use an Open Face... reasons...
If you are only going to run Time Trial, and are NOT planning to go into competition its your choice.. however I only race in $$ races and NEED GOOD VISIBILITY ... I have to see if a faster car is closing on me, & with an open face I can turn and look over my shoulder ...with a Full Face you vision is restricted...
Also you ET and speed determines if NHRA will let you run an open face.. I only run low 12 sec. so I use the open face....
We've always used that saying. However, I think it was much more appropriate years ago when we were all buying motorcylce helmets that were DOT certified (a low bar) and nothing more. Today it's a bit of a different story. All SA2010 helmets passed the same comprehensive safety test, and meet the standards. That doesn't mean that some don't offer more protection than the standards, it is just we don't have anyway of knowing, it probably isn't necessary, and price probably isn't a good indicator. Price for SA2010 helmets are likely driven by by weight of the materials, ventalation, style, quality of non safety materials, etc.
So as others have said, buy one that is comfortable and meets your needs.
I totally agree. I guess I waas just trying to say don't let money be the driving force behind choosing a helmet. That looks like a better deal because it's cheaper isn't ALWAYS the case. Not that you have to buy an expensive one either but I believe you definitely get what you pay for. So I'll take the penalty for "misuse of a quote".
I use a full face Bell helmet with the larger eyeport. I recall it was under $400.00 Simpson and Aria are decent brands. The GeForce is probably a more 'low-budge' helmet. Saferacer.com has a good selection at competitive prices.
1) Snell approved cost more because of the sticker, you pay significantly more for a Snell helmet despite the fact there is no proof it is a safer helmet
2) a DOT helmet is not necessarily an inferior helmet
3) sadly it is all academic as racing governing bodies take the easy way out and demand Snell, despite the fact data casts doubt on a Snell helmet being safer
1) Snell approved cost more because of the sticker, you pay significantly more for a Snell helmet despite the fact there is no proof it is a safer helmet
2) a DOT helmet is not necessarily an inferior helmet
3) sadly it is all academic as racing governing bodies take the easy way out and demand Snell, despite the fact data casts doubt on a Snell helmet being safer
And the point of your post is? He wants to run at a track and the Snell is required so DOT helmets are out.
For highway use, take your choice. At the track, it's Snell or you don't run.
1) Snell approved cost more because of the sticker, you pay significantly more for a Snell helmet despite the fact there is no proof it is a safer helmet
2) a DOT helmet is not necessarily an inferior helmet
3) sadly it is all academic as racing governing bodies take the easy way out and demand Snell, despite the fact data casts doubt on a Snell helmet being safer
The link takes you to a rather long but very interesting article.
I'm not so sure how relevant the article is to car crashes, where the helmet/head usually hits parts inside the car instead of pavement and phone poles. But still, a good read. Thanks!
1) Snell approved cost more because of the sticker, you pay significantly more for a Snell helmet despite the fact there is no proof it is a safer helmet
2) a DOT helmet is not necessarily an inferior helmet
3) sadly it is all academic as racing governing bodies take the easy way out and demand Snell, despite the fact data casts doubt on a Snell helmet being safer
Snell SA helmets have a nomex interior... If you are belted in the car and have your bell rung,, do you want a helmet with a Flammable interior if the car is on fire. Motorcycles have different conditions in an accident, the rider is thrown away from the bike. I have been in 2 race car fires, but, the best equipment I could buy saved me from any serious injuries,,, but man it gets really HOT. So yes, for car racing, a Snell SA is safer. All real road racing sanctioning bodies require the SA rating, but some on CF think they know better.