Insurance
Thanks
Paul
Last edited by Tropicana; Oct 11, 2013 at 11:23 PM. Reason: Typo
Thanks
Paul
However, State Farm home insurance here in Florida blows!


1) About a year ago, a girl in an SUV pulled out in front of me. I had less than 50 feet to stop from about 50 mph. Her insurance was the minimal from Progressive. SF had a check to me within a week for the full retail value of my Corvette. They subrogated with Progressive and returned my deductible some months later.
2) My son was totaled when rear ended in his Acura. The other driver had USAA and they only offered wholesale for the car, and of course, the car could not be replaced for that little. I called SF and they immediately gave me full retail for the car, and subrogated with USAA and returned my deductible a few months later.
State Farm has been really good to me. Full coverage on my Corvette is something like $350 every 6 months.
Thanks!
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
As an insurance professional for 35 years, I can tell you that State Farm is one of the premier insurance carriers and has been for decades. Allstate is also a premier carrier, and the two have been rivals for many years. As the two largest carriers in the USA, you don't have to be concerned about being insured by either one.
While it's not surprising that Allstate won't budge on their premium prices, it is surprising that you found State Farm's premiums to be so much less. Usually, those two carriers run pretty close on premium costs.
"Encompass", is a wholly owned subsidiary of Allstate Ins. I'm sorry but I have no opinion on that carrier since I've never done any business with them what-so-ever. I suggest you check with A.M. Best.
I can tell you this.....I was with Allstate for many years. Never had an issue with customer service, etc. However, every 6 months upon renewal, my premiums would increase from as little as $5, to as much as $30. I had no moving violations, or accidents. I was always told that, "everyone was receiving a slight increase."
After a number of years those increases really started to add up. Just 4 months ago, I started shopping around, getting lower quotes from every carrier except State Farm, who was nearly identical to Allstate, for the identical coverages.
I ended up switching to GEICO, because their rates were the lowest, they are an excellent carrier, and even after increasing my liability coverages substantially, GEICO ended up $536.00 per 6 months less that Allstate, or State Farm. That's $1,072, per year!!! That is serious money. Obviously, I kissed Allstate good-bye.
No one should become complacent, and just keep paying premiums, like I did. From now on, I will shop around at least every two years, if not sooner. I have no loyalty to any one company. Any carrier that has a high A.M. Best rating, that gives me the best coverage for my premium dollar, gets my business.
Thanks
Paul

.
Peoples perceptions are always based on their particular experience.
Fact is, I have never seen any homeowner policy from any company that provides coverage for damage done to furniture by pets. Every policy I have ever seen in my entire career, has specific "Named Perils" for contents coverage. That is, Fire, Smoke, Water Escape, Burglary, Vandalism, etc. If your loss falls under a named peril, it's covered. If there is no peril for your loss, there is no coverage.
I have never seen a peril listed for "damage done by pets, or animals", or any similar language. In fact, damage to contents by pets is specifically excluded under every policy I've ever seen.
I cannot imagine, an adjuster saying it would have been covered, if the dog did this before. It makes absolutely no sense. Something has been lost in translation here.
Peoples perceptions are always based on their particular experience.
Fact is, I have never seen any homeowner policy from any company that provides coverage for damage done to furniture by pets. Every policy I have ever seen in my entire career, has specific "Named Perils" for contents coverage. That is, Fire, Smoke, Water Escape, Burglary, Vandalism, etc. If your loss falls under a named peril, it's covered. If there is no peril for your loss, there is no coverage.
I have never seen a peril listed for "damage done by pets, or animals", or any similar language. In fact, damage to contents by pets is specifically excluded under every policy I've ever seen.
I cannot imagine, an adjuster saying it would have been covered, if the dog did this before. It makes absolutely no sense. Something has been lost in translation here.
The adjuster clearly stated "if the "occurrence" had happened before the claim would be covered. That is a rediculous stance.















