C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2007 Z51 LS2 Corvette vs 2008 Z51 LS3 Corvette

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2017, 11:01 AM
  #21  
Aliquantus
Instructor
 
Aliquantus's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2016
Location: Champlin MN
Posts: 144
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I think I'm going to head over to the track tomorrow, I haven't been to the strip with this car and am really curious just what this thing can do.
Old 09-22-2017, 11:37 AM
  #22  
Sic Liter
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Sic Liter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2017
Posts: 90
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

People like Rusty is why I started this discussion. Like I stated before better hope you are a good driver because it ultimately comes down to the driver in order to get that car length.

Last edited by Sic Liter; 09-22-2017 at 11:59 AM.
Old 09-22-2017, 11:40 AM
  #23  
echelonphoto
Pro
 
echelonphoto's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2010
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Having owned seven vettes in the last 10 years....its not just asbout peak power....the ls3 is much more driveable day to day because of the broader torque curve and the fact that they really improved heat soak on this engine...my old ls2 car would really run like a dog on hot summer days...the ls3's...no problem. Also the better trans makes quite a difference too.
Old 09-22-2017, 11:41 AM
  #24  
Sic Liter
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Sic Liter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2017
Posts: 90
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aliquantus
I think I'm going to head over to the track tomorrow, I haven't been to the strip with this car and am really curious just what this thing can do.
Good luck man, curious to see what trap you put down and how it relates to the data
Old 09-22-2017, 11:43 AM
  #25  
Sic Liter
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Sic Liter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2017
Posts: 90
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by echelonphoto
Having owned seven vettes in the last 10 years....its not just asbout peak power....the ls3 is much more driveable day to day because of the broader torque curve and the fact that they really improved heat soak on this engine...my old ls2 car would really run like a dog on hot summer days...the ls3's...no problem. Also the better trans makes quite a difference too.
Did your old LS2 have the Z51 package? The Z51 has an oil cooler which helps keep the engine cooler.

Last edited by Sic Liter; 09-22-2017 at 11:43 AM.
Old 09-22-2017, 01:18 PM
  #26  
mtarr07
Instructor
 
mtarr07's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: Arizona
Posts: 217
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sic Liter
Wrong. You statement makes no sense. Trap Speed tells you what your hp to weight is.
What in gods name are you talking about.

Your horsepower and weight tell you what your horsepower weight ratio is. Trap speed has NOTHING to do with it. Come on man. I've attached a link to do it for you.

https://www.easycalculation.com/phys...ight-ratio.php
Old 09-22-2017, 01:19 PM
  #27  
mtarr07
Instructor
 
mtarr07's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: Arizona
Posts: 217
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sic liter
people like rusty is why i started this discussion. Like i stated before better hope you are a good driver because it ultimately comes down to the driver in order to get that car length.
It does not come down to the driver or else the ls2 and ls3 time would have, on average, the same trap speed and 1/4 mile time.

The times clearly show that on average, with the average driver, the ls3 is faster.

So by default, the ls3 is faster.

Last edited by mtarr07; 09-22-2017 at 01:20 PM.
Old 09-22-2017, 01:22 PM
  #28  
mtarr07
Instructor
 
mtarr07's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: Arizona
Posts: 217
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sic Liter
I forgot to mention that the LS2 also has a flatter torque curve than the LS3. A flatter torque curve will give you better acceleration over a broader range of engine speeds.
Prove it.

Show us a stock LS2 and a stock LS3 on a dyno back to back where the LS2 makes more torque.

You are providing ZERO real world data to substantiate your claims.

And you know dont even know how to calculate HP/ weight ratio.
Old 09-22-2017, 01:27 PM
  #29  
JayhawkCPA
Racer
 
JayhawkCPA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2017
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 452
Received 134 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mtarr07
It does not come down to the driver or else the ls2 and ls3 time would have, on average, the same trap speed and 1/4 mile time.

The times clearly show that on average, with the average driver, the ls3 is faster.

So by default, the ls3 is faster.
Agreed, why do people keep beating this dead horse?
The following users liked this post:
95rtturbo (09-22-2017)
Old 09-22-2017, 01:54 PM
  #30  
LoganExplosion
Drifting
 
LoganExplosion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: chair
Posts: 1,841
Received 157 Likes on 112 Posts
Default



Sorry bud. They're definitely more different than just "comes down to the driver". GM took what the aftermarket was doing and applied it to the next generation. Larger bore, better intake, more aggressive camshaft, strengthened casting, etc. The results can be seen in post #3.
So don't come in here, with your anger and regret, trying to prove something to yaself!

torque curve looks similar to me!

Honestly, you have a C6. ENJOY IT!! Do you think the LS3 guys are saying the new LT1 just comes down to the driver? NO. It's the next generation with several advancements. If GM didn't advance the designs every generation, we'd all have blue flame I6 engines.




I researched and found the car I wanted to modify. That car has an LS3.
The following 2 users liked this post by LoganExplosion:
95rtturbo (09-22-2017), mtarr07 (09-22-2017)
Old 09-22-2017, 02:00 PM
  #31  
95rtturbo
Drifting
 
95rtturbo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2011
Location: Chesterfield (St. Louis) MO
Posts: 1,377
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Finally starting to get some logical replies, good to see. The LS3 is more powerful, period. No debating it. No one is saying the LS2 sucks. I have an 08Z (LS7). No reason for me to make an asinine post saying the LS7 is more powerful than the LS9.

Last edited by 95rtturbo; 09-22-2017 at 02:01 PM.
Old 09-22-2017, 02:41 PM
  #32  
2L8LUZ
Racer
 
2L8LUZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2017
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sic Liter
I just did an average trap calculation between the LS2 and the LS3 data from the list you provided. The average trap for the LS2 was 112.05 mph, the average trap for the LS3 was 115.83 mph. Trap speed tells you what your HP to weight is. My math comes out to be 115.83/112.05 = 3.37%. The LS3 is 430 hp, so 430*(0.9663) = 415 hp for the LS2. 15 HP difference means it ultimately comes down to the driver.

That's a 2.5 mph gain.... 25 hp
Old 09-22-2017, 02:44 PM
  #33  
2L8LUZ
Racer
 
2L8LUZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2017
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

You can't argue the Airflow from the Heads and the Intake Air Flow... Ls2 guys/gals have to install a FAST 102 plenum to match the LS3

Add the NPP option and there is no doubt the LS3 is faster...

Even at 410hp... the npp option car is 436

And how can you make up for the displacement.... 6.0 vs 6.2

Last edited by 2L8LUZ; 09-22-2017 at 02:47 PM.
Old 09-22-2017, 02:52 PM
  #34  
windyC6
Safety Car
 
windyC6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,951
Received 514 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mtarr07
I think at this point the market is just so flooded with C6s for great prices that there isn't really a price difference from 2006-2009 cars for example. It comes down more often to that specific seller and what they want to get for their car. So why not get the newer one with more power if everything else is equal?

I think you're diving a bit deep with your analysis based on ONE data point. Maybe the LS3 is underrated? Maybe neither of them are? Who knows?

What I do know is that real world data consistently proves that the LS3 car traps 4-5mph higher than LS2 cars. Look at the tops 1/4 mile list for both from this very forum.

Showroom Stock LS2 (2005 -2007)
12.215 @ 115.45 - LS1LT1 - 06 A6 - (1278)
12.235 @ 115.58 - 06C6FVR - 06 M6 Z51 - (333)
12.290 @ 114.29 - Proney - 07 M6 - (4500)
12.314 @ 114.82 - CYA Vett - 05 M6 F55 - (675)
12.422 @ 113.90 - DrRichie - 05 M6 Z51
12.499 @ 114.90 - Jschindler - 05 M6 Z51
12.53x @ 113.00 - Wicked07C6 - 07 M6 Z51 - (914)
12.540 @ 113.59 - Tony 63 Vette - 06 A6 - (1510)
12.548 @ 113.74 - Tony96LT4 - 06 A6 Z51 - (1149)
12.56x @ 113.39 - Red Sleeper - 06 A6
12.56x @ 112.00 - Orange C6 - 05 A4 Z51 - (56)
12.650 @ 111.65 - Zippin Zee - 05 M6 Z51 - (48)
12.665 @ 113.03 - Mdrrandall - 07 M6 Z51 - (1675)
12.693 @ 114.88 - Prankster - 06 M6 - (1621)
12.69x @ 112.32 - Silverlx - 06 A6 - (872)
12.703 @ 112.43 - Jelsis - 06 A6 Z51 - (452)
12.70x @ 113.00 - Blackmajik - 07 A6 - (1627)
12.71x @ 111.30 - Flyin05 - 05 M6 Z51
12.71x @ 111.00 - Demented - 05 A4 Z51
12.74x @ 108.67 - Shooter 49 - 05 A4 3.15 - (39)
12.756 @ 112.57 - C5Pilot - 07 A6 Z51 - (903)
12.757 @ 109.25 - Ponchorello - 05 A4 3.15 - (990)
12.795 @ 112.17 - Jchazr - 05 M6 Z51 - (447)
12.80x @ 111.00 - SheDevilC6 - 07 A6 Z51 - (1668)
12.81x @ 112.83 - Vette-oholic - 05 M6 Z51 - (494)
12.817 @ 110.95 - SkyKing - 07 A6 F55 - (2480)
12.85x @ 114.53 - Mr Z51 - 06 M6 Z51
12.917 @ 111.67 - Brewcitygymratt - 06 A6 - (4578)
12.936 @ 111.40 - DiggyMoe - 07 M6 - (965)
12.97x @ 108.00 - Ginny C6 - 05 A4 F55 - (56)
12.98x @ 108.00 - Tampa Vet - 05 A4 3.15 - (119)
12.99x @ 111.70 - C64ME - 05 M6 Z51 - (329)
13.04x @ 109.15 - TMyers - 06 A6 - (528)
13.054 @ 113.31 - RDunn - 06 M6 - (982)
13.10x @ 108.70 - Rothchilds - 05 A4 F55 3.15
13.12x @ 110.40 - JDWK - 05 M6 Z51
13.25x @ 110.60 - C6 Matt - 05 M6 Z51 - (118)
13.267 @ 108.59 - Sfadchi - 06 A6 Z51 - (884)
13.26x @ 105.30 - Joeking - 05 A4 Z51 - (657)
13.30x @ 107.00 - Shurite44 - 06 A6 Z51 - (764)
13.35x @ 108.10 - Phatpharmd - 06 A6 - (591)
13.62x @ 106.18 - Rich28 - 05 A4 Z51

Showroom Stock LS3 (2008 - 2013)
11.718 @ 119.94 - AndrewZPSU - 08 M6 - (2586)
11.806 @ 118.82 - Gmrulz - 08 A6 Z51, NPP - (3478)
11.974 @ 116.98 - Proney - 08 M6 Z51, NPP - (4652)
12.058 @ 122.05 - AndrewZPSU - 10 A6 NPP - (5051)
12.100 @ 115.19 - Odin - 09 A6 2.73 npp - (4325)
12.102 @ 117.60 - Dingrao - 08 A6 - (3561)
12.127 @ 116.59 - Pettvette - 08 A6 - (4278)
12.159 @ 115.59 - Old Goat - 09 A6 2.73 - (3708)
12.167 @ 117.15 - DarkOctane - 08 A6 NPP - (6310)
12.167 @ 116.54 - Vinsane112 - 08 A6 2.73 - (2740)
12.173 @ 117.59 - Marcho Polo - 08 A6 Z51 2.73 npp - (7213)
12.186 @ 117.72 - Hardhattg - 08 M6 Z51 - (2686)
12.201 @ 114.07 - DerekSDickens - 08 A6 2.73 - (7061)
12.237 @ 112.86 - 940CACC - 08 A6 - (2871)
12.244 @ 117.83 - 74Vette - 08 M6 - (4617)
12.305 @ 116.51 - JBrunoJC6 - 08 A6 NPP - (6722)
12.400 @ 116.36 - RandyDank23 - 08 A6 - (6059)
12.262 @ 115.22 - Oklahoma - 08 A6 - (3765)
12.276 @ 118.66 - EZ28 - 08 M6 Z51 NPP - (3247)
12.355 @ 117.47 - Bain - 08 A6 NPP 2.73 - (2755)
12.357 @ 116.94 - TNorman - 08 A6 NPP - (4227)
12.408 @ 116.11 - XtremeChubbles - 08 A6 Z51 - (6589)
12.409 @ 114.70 - Jschindler - 08 M6 Z51 NPP - (2132)
12.419 @ 116.15 - JTorchz06 - 09 A6 Z51 NPP - (3185)
12.412 @ 115.38 - HOXXOH - 08 A6 F55 - (2478)
12.428 @ 116.67 - Pea-Jay - 08 A6 - (4448)
12.494 @ 115.54 - 1.8T - 08 M6 Z51 - (2310)
12.500 @ 115.53 - Shane Fap - 08 A6 - (6298)
12.514 @ 116.73 - SK360 - 08 A6 2.73 - (6283)
12.552 @ 114.70 - Larry R - 08 A6 2.73 - (4054)
12.600 @ 114.12 - Beefcake - 08 A6 - (2875)
12.658 @ 114.99 - PhillyLS1 - 09 M6 - (3151)
12.668 @ 113.61 - CFP40 - 08 A6 NPP 2.73 - (2828)
12.689 @ 112.07 - Bfppt1 - 10 A6 - (5300)
12.747 @ 114.31 - Detoxx03 - 08 M6 NPP- (4057)
12.828 @ 113.20 - C6David - 08 A6 NPP - (6854)
13.354 @ 110.78 - M453W - 09 A6 NPP- (5708)
13.428 @ 109.32 - Dan Wendling - 09 A6 NPP - (4032)
OH NO !!!! Not this "real world data" crap again !!!!! Just like when the Trump-Meister states that we are all worried about being politically correct, we are all also being to "Real Data" correct..........
Old 09-22-2017, 02:54 PM
  #35  
Sic Liter
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Sic Liter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2017
Posts: 90
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I never said the LS2 was faster. Yes, the LS3 is faster but the difference is so minimal.
Old 09-22-2017, 03:00 PM
  #36  
Sic Liter
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Sic Liter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2017
Posts: 90
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LoganExplosion


Sorry bud. They're definitely more different than just "comes down to the driver". GM took what the aftermarket was doing and applied it to the next generation. Larger bore, better intake, more aggressive camshaft, strengthened casting, etc. The results can be seen in post #3.
So don't come in here, with your anger and regret, trying to prove something to yaself!

torque curve looks similar to me!

Honestly, you have a C6. ENJOY IT!! Do you think the LS3 guys are saying the new LT1 just comes down to the driver? NO. It's the next generation with several advancements. If GM didn't advance the designs every generation, we'd all have blue flame I6 engines.




I researched and found the car I wanted to modify. That car has an LS3.
Looks like a dip at 3200 rpm for the ls3 lol. The LS2's curve is more flatter around that range with no dips.

Last edited by Sic Liter; 09-22-2017 at 03:02 PM.
Old 09-22-2017, 03:02 PM
  #37  
95rtturbo
Drifting
 
95rtturbo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2011
Location: Chesterfield (St. Louis) MO
Posts: 1,377
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

The difference is 30 (or 36) HP, so it's quantifiable. It's up to the buyer to decide if they think that is minimal or not.

Get notified of new replies

To 2007 Z51 LS2 Corvette vs 2008 Z51 LS3 Corvette

Old 09-22-2017, 03:03 PM
  #38  
95rtturbo
Drifting
 
95rtturbo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2011
Location: Chesterfield (St. Louis) MO
Posts: 1,377
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sic Liter
Looks like a dip at 3200 rpm for the ls3 lol. The LS2's curve is more flatter around that range with no dips.
That is one spot on the curve, and the tq is basically even to the LS2, which is moot. Doesn't make up for everywhere else the LS3 is making more tq.

Last edited by 95rtturbo; 09-22-2017 at 03:04 PM.
Old 09-22-2017, 03:04 PM
  #39  
Corvette_Ed
Race Director
 
Corvette_Ed's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2012
Location: Phoenix area, AZ
Posts: 15,242
Received 2,843 Likes on 1,801 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sic Liter
Your LS3 engine is 430 hp. Your butterfly valves in your exhaust add 6 hp. Your car is 436 hp. From the trap data list provided it does not state which LS3 cars had the NPP exhaust option and which did not.
No, it's 436 HP. The exhaust contributes to engine HP, otherwise it wouldn't be called HP.
Old 09-22-2017, 03:06 PM
  #40  
95rtturbo
Drifting
 
95rtturbo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2011
Location: Chesterfield (St. Louis) MO
Posts: 1,377
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Corvette_Ed
No, it's 436 HP. The exhaust contributes to engine HP, otherwise it wouldn't be called HP.
I'm really not sure what the OP is arguing here. The LS2 is a good engine. The LS3, however, is better. No debate.


Quick Reply: 2007 Z51 LS2 Corvette vs 2008 Z51 LS3 Corvette



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 PM.