When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Awesome!! How do you feel about the GS’s? Some people tell me they are slower because of the “weight difference” (a few hundred lbs at most) and the wider body etc. I just think they are the best looking c6 available. If I really want any more HP than 436 there are plenty of options, but without having driven one yet, I am assuming that 436 horses are more than enough to have a little fun; and fit right in the perfect niche for usable street power.
Just a little FYI... you can never have enough power. .430 is nothing more than a good starting point.
Just a little FYI... you can never have enough power. .430 is nothing more than a good starting point.
Haha I agree to some extent!!! I just wonder at what point does it become too much for everyday street use? I would plan to daily drive my car and while 800-1000 HP would be a AMAZING, I feel like 4-500 is still very respectable and usable on the street!
Haha I agree to some extent!!! I just wonder at what point does it become too much for everyday street use? I would plan to daily drive my car and while 800-1000 HP would be a AMAZING, I feel like 4-500 is still very respectable and usable on the street!
Awesome!! How do you feel about the GS’s? Some people tell me they are slower because of the “weight difference” (a few hundred lbs at most) and the wider body etc. I just think they are the best looking c6 available. If I really want any more HP than 436 there are plenty of options, but without having driven one yet, I am assuming that 436 horses are more than enough to have a little fun; and fit right in the perfect niche for usable street power.
they are not slow -- just ask the few passengers I have had where I stick foot to the floor in 2nd gear -- Glad they had on underwear and pants.. cuz my passenger seat would be brown.. get the picture? but if you are really 24 going on 25 -- start with 300 or so HP -- if you can get to 30 yr old without hurting anyone - go to 350 HP -- if that is ok when you are 45yr old going on 46 -- goto 400 HP. if you are still ok at 60 then go for more HP. Be safe - Stay Safe.
they are not slow -- just ask the few passengers I have had where I stick foot to the floor in 2nd gear -- Glad they had on underwear and pants.. cuz my passenger seat would be brown.. get the picture? but if you are really 24 going on 25 -- start with 300 or so HP -- if you can get to 30 yr old without hurting anyone - go to 350 HP -- if that is ok when you are 45yr old going on 46 -- goto 400 HP. if you are still ok at 60 then go for more HP. Be safe - Stay Safe.
Awesome!! I’ve driven cars in excess of 700 HP so I am not new to controlling power in cars, been a gear head and car follower since about 10 years old lol. I just personally have never driven a c6 GS but I know 4-500 HP in that frame has to be a blast and plenty usable on the road.
Definitely, in that case you bought that house at the right time! That house today is probably worth 150-200,000.. especially here in jersey. Not to mention, taxes here on a 1000 sq. Ft condo are 3,500 a year, plus 2500 a year in hoa fees. If you’re wages tripled too from 500 too almost 1500 that sure would help paying it off a lot quicker.. a case of buying at the right time for sure. All this house talk is making me want another vette that much more 😁
That was just an example (not my personal house or wages) to show that inflation can make what you think is a high price with high payments today, seem like a bargain several years later.
Inflation in the '70s was 7.36%. If you bought a house at 6% in '70 it was like buying interest free in 10 years. Inflation in the past 10 years has slowed to less than 2%. Buying now at 4% interest is a bargain if we repeat with some high inflation in the next 10 years.
My advice to a young guy in NJ, is to get out now, while you still can.
Even though house prices in Phoenix are going up quickly, you can still buy a 2,000 sq ft house without a HOA for under $150K and less than $1500 taxes in a decent area.
Yea....I find the term "inflation" to be almost every financial advisers weapon of choice...so-to-speak. Had a 100-k sitting in a bank once just sitting there doing nothing (which is pretty common these days). So their adviser called me in trying to talk me into opening some kind of account. Anyway, he asked me if I knew that I was losing 2% every year due to inflation? .So I asked him if I were to go with your suggestion, what would that 100-K be worth tomorrow morning after your fees...etc...etc. He looked surprised and he said....."about 94-K". I said so let me see if I understand this.....I lose 2% a year....or I lose 6% overnight ??....HUM....thats a tuff one. Don't get me wrong, I understand the long term possibilities, but they aren't guaranteed.....
Yea....I find the term "inflation" to be almost every financial advisers weapon of choice...so-to-speak. Had a 100-k sitting in a bank once just sitting there doing nothing (which is pretty common these days). So their adviser called me in trying to talk me into opening some kind of account. Anyway, he asked me if I knew that I was losing 2% every year due to inflation? .So I asked him if I were to go with your suggestion, what would that 100-K be worth tomorrow morning after your fees...etc...etc. He looked surprised and he said....."about 94-K". I said so let me see if I understand this.....I lose 2% a year....or I lose 6% overnight ??....HUM....thats a tuff one. Don't get me wrong, I understand the long term possibilities, but they aren't guaranteed.....
If you had that same $100K in a bank earning 2% back in 1979, by 1991 it would have been worth $77K, due to the annual inflation rate of 12.9% for those two years. Buying land or housing is a hedge against high inflation. In times of low inflation like the past 10 years, it's not that big of a deal, unless you sit on a really low interest rate for a long term. Land or housing in a growing population area beats inflation, even if you only rent it out for the price of your costs.
If you had that same $100K in a bank earning 2% back in 1979, by 1991 it would have been worth $77K, due to the annual inflation rate of 12.9% for those two years. Buying land or housing is a hedge against high inflation. In times of low inflation like the past 10 years, it's not that big of a deal, unless you sit on a really low interest rate for a long term. Land or housing in a growing population area beats inflation, even if you only rent it out for the price of your costs.
Stock holdings (i.e. business ownership) are also a good way of staying on top of inflation.
LOL, sure! If you don't know what you're doing you can lose your shirt on a car, real estate, or anything else.
Buying vehicles is a sure fire way to lose big time, real estate is a different animal. When you find out how to stop losses in a crash you can help me out....immediately!
Buying vehicles is a sure fire way to lose big time, real estate is a different animal. When you find out how to stop losses in a crash you can help me out....immediately!
In general, before investing one dime:
1) How old is the person?
2) What are the goals for the money? (retirement, down payment for future house, play money, saving for kid's college, etc.)
3) Everyone has to figure out what their risk level is.
Beyond that, the big mistake most people make is selling in a panic. Once you sell, you just locked in your losses.
Prices for any type of asset can vary widely, and the more liquid they are (like most stocks) the more volatile the price is. In a downturn just keep the assets and ignore the daily price noise. If you can't take the volatility then you shouldn't be in stocks ("risk level").
1) How old is the person?
2) What are the goals for the money? (retirement, down payment for future house, play money, saving for kid's college, etc.)
3) Everyone has to figure out what their risk level is.
Beyond that, the big mistake most people make is selling in a panic. Once you sell, you just locked in your losses.
Prices for any type of asset can vary widely, and the more liquid they are (like most stocks) the more volatile the price is. In a downturn just keep the assets and ignore the daily price noise. If you can't take the volatility then you shouldn't be in stocks ("risk level").
I'm not one to brag but I'm in a lot better place than most. 38 years ago when I bought my last house the owner told me he lost a $100 bill in the back yard and couldn't find it. I told him if I found I'd return it. Never found it but the next thing I know a few years later I had a money tree sprouting $100 bills so fast it was a struggle to keep up with them. I haven't worked for so long I can't remember and I even pay the IRS more than necessary because I'm just a nice guy. Oh, I did return the guy's $100. If it ever stops producing I'm up **** creek.
I'm not one to brag but I'm in a lot better place than most. 38 years ago when I bought my last house the owner told me he lost a $100 bill in the back yard and couldn't find it. I told him if I found I'd return it. Never found it but the next thing I know a few years later I had a money tree sprouting $100 bills so fast it was a struggle to keep up with them. I haven't worked for so long I can't remember and I even pay the IRS more than necessary because I'm just a nice guy. Oh, I did return the guy's $100. If it ever stops producing I'm up **** creek.
I wasn't so lucky, I had to do it the old-fashioned way.
If you had that same $100K in a bank earning 2% back in 1979, by 1991 it would have been worth $77K, due to the annual inflation rate of 12.9% for those two years. Buying land or housing is a hedge against high inflation. In times of low inflation like the past 10 years, it's not that big of a deal, unless you sit on a really low interest rate for a long term. Land or housing in a growing population area beats inflation, even if you only rent it out for the price of your costs.
Oh I understand completely the point your trying to get across...and it's well taken. But for the sake of argument....what happened to the other 33-K from that initial 100-K.....?
Oh I understand completely the point your trying to get across...and it's well taken. But for the sake of argument....what happened to the other 33-K from that initial 100-K.....?