Notices
C6 Corvette ZR1 & Z06 General info about GM’s Corvette Supercar, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

[ZR1] Great: C6 ZR1 next to C4 ZR1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2009, 06:04 PM
  #21  
breakskeet
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
breakskeet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Rattlesnake, FL
Posts: 1,236
Received 269 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LEAVINU
Was wondering the same- I never knew this about the older ZR1.
:o
Actually the first ZR1 option was in 1970. There was actually even a ZR2 in 1971.

cheers!
Old 12-01-2009, 07:08 PM
  #22  
88BlackZ-51
Race Director
 
88BlackZ-51's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Posts: 10,745
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 8000RPM
pwned !
is that a new word?
Old 12-01-2009, 09:00 PM
  #23  
GTB/ZR-1
Safety Car
 
GTB/ZR-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Winter Garden (central),FL,USA
Posts: 4,662
Received 77 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rapid Transit
Not meant as a flame, so please enlighten me. Why did Chevy have Lotus (a British company) and Mercury Marine (Boat builder?) do the LT5? Couldn't Chevy develop something inhouse, to keep it a true Chevrolet Corvette?
The idea came abt in the mid 80s of a "400/400" world-class engine. Chevy didn't have the technology @ the time to produce an NA motor efficient & tractable enough for production.

They turned to Lotus, as the key was in the heads, as Chevy wanted to keep the standard bore spacing for some reason... The only way to achieve the goals was DOHCs that Lotus was able to produce & they designed the entire engine while they were @ it...

Mercruiser came into the picture as the motors needed to be hand-assembled in a clean-room type setting. They then bagged them & sent them off to the BG plant (fully complete) to bolt them in.

Hopefully that wasn't too long-winded
Old 12-01-2009, 09:33 PM
  #24  
DoctorV8
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
DoctorV8's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 2,747
Received 75 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 88BlackZ-51
that's because your driving.
If you're gonna flame someone...it's much more effective if you get your grammar right, bro.
Old 12-02-2009, 01:37 PM
  #25  
88BlackZ-51
Race Director
 
88BlackZ-51's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Posts: 10,745
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DoctorV8
If you're gonna flame someone...it's much more effective if you get your grammar right, bro.


oh really!!

that's how we speak in canada, eh! i didnt know i was going to be judged by a english professor.

kurt and i are friends. i am not really "flaming" him as you call it. i typically dont check my spelling or grammar. this is a car forum, i am not writing someone a speeding ticket.

have a good one!
Old 12-02-2009, 01:41 PM
  #26  
Chicago1
Race Director
 
Chicago1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Rio Rancho NM
Posts: 12,053
Received 321 Likes on 208 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 88BlackZ-51
oh really!!

that's how we speak in canada, eh! !
That's how the "Vatos" speak down here. When I moved here from Chicago I asked them if they where Canadian, most of them are to stupid to understand the joke. I call them Canadian Vatos" What's up ehh?" in a spanish tone is how they talk over here.
Old 12-02-2009, 02:03 PM
  #27  
ztheusa
Melting Slicks

 
ztheusa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Taildragers rule! USA1
Posts: 3,464
Received 345 Likes on 215 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rapid Transit
Not meant as a flame, so please enlighten me. Why did Chevy have Lotus (a British company) and Mercury Marine (Boat builder?) do the LT5? Couldn't Chevy develop something inhouse, to keep it a true Chevrolet Corvette?
The production run was too small for GM to deal with. It was right in line with the capabilities of the smaller manufacturers.

It failed because it was too big, too heavy, nobody could work on them, and mostly because pushrod technology improved.
Old 12-02-2009, 02:06 PM
  #28  
ztheusa
Melting Slicks

 
ztheusa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Taildragers rule! USA1
Posts: 3,464
Received 345 Likes on 215 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by breakskeet
Actually the first ZR1 option was in 1970. There was actually even a ZR2 in 1971.

cheers!
Too bad it was in a Blazer!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RPO_ZR2
Old 12-02-2009, 02:21 PM
  #29  
breakskeet
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
breakskeet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Rattlesnake, FL
Posts: 1,236
Received 269 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ztheusa
Too bad it was in a Blazer!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RPO_ZR2
Yes that is true, but 12 Corvettes in 1971 were optioned with a ZR2 package......

cheers!

Link:
http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/...php/photo/1973


This is copied from a ZR2 for sale add:

THE 1971 ZR-2 CORVETTE (454 cubic inches 425 horsepower)


ZR2 454cid/425hp with a M22 4-speed, original drivetrain and original interior. 1 of 12 and believed to be the only Duntov and Bloomington Gold winner.
Description Very rare, special limited production ZR2 Zora Duntov Racer. 1-year-only factory option package offering the best high performance parts the factory had to offer at the time. This is for sale by the second owner who has owned it for more than 20+ years. 1 of 12 produced and 1 of 8 coupes manufactured. This is rarer than the infamous L88. This 1971 Corvette ZR2 has original drivetrain number matching, original interior car, restored by Thorp's Corvettes, 454cid/425hp super car. The ZR2 specification package included the dual plate clutch, M22 Rock-Crusher 4-speed gearbox, JS6 dual-pin heavy duty power brakes, F41 heavy duty suspension and aluminum heavy duty radiator without shroud, front and rear stabilizer bars. Options not permitted were power steering, radio or air conditioning. This super car is all business. Honored and awarded Corvette Bloomington Gold, Top Flight, NCRS Performance Verification Award Zora Duntov. NCRS judging sheets and much original documentation. This is a must-own for the Corvette collector


PS: TAILDRAGGERS DO RULE!!!!!

Last edited by breakskeet; 12-02-2009 at 03:02 PM.
Old 12-02-2009, 06:21 PM
  #30  
AFVETTE
Team Owner
 
AFVETTE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Swansea IL
Posts: 20,076
Received 41 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NytmereZ
by far , a work of art, the LS9 performance is great but the Lotus built LT5 was a groundbreaking step for the corvette, a very special motor.
the LT5 is art and engineering at it's finest and has aged very well, oh and it sounded so gooood.

Tom

Last edited by AFVETTE; 12-02-2009 at 06:23 PM.
Old 12-02-2009, 06:59 PM
  #31  
FASTAZU
Race Director

 
FASTAZU's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Compound in the Grove, Ga.
Posts: 11,329
Received 910 Likes on 583 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods)
2018 C4 of Year Finalist
2015 C4 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '16
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified

Default

Nice pic thanks for posting
Old 12-03-2009, 03:36 AM
  #32  
Z51JEFF
Race Director
 
Z51JEFF's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Fremont Ca
Posts: 12,916
Received 649 Likes on 423 Posts
2022 C4 of the Year Finalist - Modified

Default

Originally Posted by stic5
Hmm... that may very well being true. I also think the C4 ZR-1 was one of the most exciting cars of its time. That being said, I also think that the LT-5 was a mistake in a way. It was overly expensive and heavy, and offered very little performance advantage over the LT1.
In a way Id have to agree with you considering how G.M. does things,even 25+ years ago.The moter AND the body panels but how Im grateful for their mistake.And just how the C6 ZR1 is blowing everything out of the water the C4 ZR-1 did the same exact thing to cars costing 3-4 times as much 20 years ago.I love mine
Old 12-03-2009, 03:50 AM
  #33  
Z51JEFF
Race Director
 
Z51JEFF's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Fremont Ca
Posts: 12,916
Received 649 Likes on 423 Posts
2022 C4 of the Year Finalist - Modified

Default

Originally Posted by Rapid Transit
Not meant as a flame, so please enlighten me. Why did Chevy have Lotus (a British company) and Mercury Marine (Boat builder?) do the LT5? Couldn't Chevy develop something inhouse, to keep it a true Chevrolet Corvette?
This has been answered but Ill polish the response a little.At the time G.M. owned Lotus so in a way it was built by G.M. Lotus had the experience building 4 cam motors so thats how Lotus came into the program.Mercury Marine had the experience with casting aluminum on a mass produced motor so thats how they came into the program.What little bit of input G.M. did contribute was abit of an obstacle for all involved.This is what Ive read anyway.These motors are not hard to work on for anybody that works on their own cars.The LT5 is extremely solid so breaking one isnt easy.For your viewing pleasure.[IMG][/IMG]
Old 12-07-2009, 03:10 AM
  #34  
DDSLT5
Team Owner
 
DDSLT5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: This city NEVER sleeps! Frank's back yard!
Posts: 35,628
Received 68 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 88BlackZ-51
oh really!!

that's how we speak in canada, eh! i didnt know i was going to be judged by a english professor.

kurt and i are friends. i am not really "flaming" him as you call it. i typically dont check my spelling or grammar. this is a car forum, i am not writing someone a speeding ticket.

have a good one!
Rick - are you drunk posting again?

Doctor V8 is Sanjay and he lives in Texas. You were flaming him with your post - not kurt.


Sanjay pwned your ***!
Old 12-07-2009, 07:30 AM
  #35  
96LT4
Team Owner
 
96LT4's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Kennesaw, GA www.96LT4.com
Posts: 57,105
Received 65 Likes on 41 Posts
Former Moderator
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Cruise-In VI Veteran
CI3 Car Show Winner
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21


Default

Took these when the ZR-1 first hit the streets back in October of 08 at Petit LeMans.

The new Z drew a huge crowd, but my ole 91 drew the questions and admiration.




Old 12-07-2009, 09:34 AM
  #36  
88BlackZ-51
Race Director
 
88BlackZ-51's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Posts: 10,745
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DDSLT5
Rick - are you drunk posting again?

Doctor V8 is Sanjay and he lives in Texas. You were flaming him with your post - not kurt.


Sanjay pwned your ***!
that's funny. not sure why i thought it was kurt.

oh well!
Old 12-07-2009, 11:48 AM
  #37  
xlr8nflorida
Race Director
 
xlr8nflorida's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2002
Posts: 10,306
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stic5
Hmm... that may very well being true. I also think the C4 ZR-1 was one of the most exciting cars of its time. That being said, I also think that the LT-5 was a mistake in a way. It was overly expensive and heavy, and offered very little performance advantage over the LT1. They should have just come out with a supercharged LT1 on the ZR-1 and then they would have had a dominating beast, much like the C6 ZR1 is now.
The same comparison is being made today between a C6 Z06 and C6 ZR-1 with many people saying the ZR-1 is too expensive and not worth the extra coin. I'm sorry but $105,000+ is expensive just like $60,000+ was expensive in 1990. But in 1990, the ZR-1 was the fastest production car in the world period. That was worth some extra coin. The LT1 didn't come out until 1992 and that closed the HP Gap some.

In regards to little performance advantage over an LT-1? You have to be joking right? I own a LT-1 as well and its a dog compared to a LT-5 - not even close in performance.

The ZR-1 was a dominating beast in its day and it did it Naturally aspirated.

I sometimes wish everybody could drive a ZR-1. Anyone that says that an LT-5 is close to performance to an LT-1 has clearly never driven one or both.

Get notified of new replies

To Great: C6 ZR1 next to C4 ZR1

Old 12-07-2009, 12:19 PM
  #38  
DDSLT5
Team Owner
 
DDSLT5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: This city NEVER sleeps! Frank's back yard!
Posts: 35,628
Received 68 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96LT4
Took these when the ZR-1 first hit the streets back in October of 08 at Petit LeMans.

The new Z drew a huge crowd, but my ole 91 drew the questions and admiration.
That was your car? I remember it - clean *** car!!! I respect the ZR1 for its performance, but I stare longingly at the LT5 and respect the HUGE leap Dave McLellan et al made when then embarked on the journey to produce a vehicle that would change all the rules and kick Porsche and Ferrari all over the pavement. The new ZR1 deserves respect from Tom Wallace who flat out went for full performance and no compromise - that is impressive in itself. History repeats itself! GM was almost bankrupt in 90 when the ZR-1 came out, and GM IS bankrupt in 09 when the ZR1 came out.



Still no substitue for 7500 rpm shifts though!
Old 12-07-2009, 01:34 PM
  #39  
Shurshot
Le Mans Master
 
Shurshot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Lake Wylie SC
Posts: 8,228
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Here is a thread on the original ZR1 option

Doug

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c3-t...r1-option.html
Old 12-08-2009, 01:42 AM
  #40  
DoctorV8
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
DoctorV8's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 2,747
Received 75 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DDSLT5
Still no substitute for 7500 rpm shifts though!
Amen to that, brother!

My 415 is currently getting repainted at Corey's shop in preparation for the NCM display in May. Looking forward to it!


Quick Reply: [ZR1] Great: C6 ZR1 next to C4 ZR1



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 AM.