procharged C6 stock motor 8psi/ran 10.35@130
#26
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: St. Lucie, FLORIDA 757 RWHP 694 RWTQ
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's the RWHP for this set-up. I have a procharger with 6 pounds of boost pushing 503 RWHP@6100. I was wondering what my times would be. Before you say it I'm going to take it to the track but I was looking for a reference time.
#27
Le Mans Master
I had a 2004 350Z and was running the vortech. I didnt go with the ATI because of this
The Z though did have Alum ( very weak ) internals and a 10.3:1 Comp..
My vortech was running 9psi on the Z and it never had a problem.
I am thinking i may wait for Vortech to release their kit for the C6...
By the way incredible driving too! Awesome video and great color choice!!
Def interested to see where this goes!!!
8 verified and confirmed VQ35DE engines killed; rings or pistons blown by the ATI Pro Charger out of a claimed 100 sales for our
car. Not very good statistics for ATI.
They had so many complaints at the forum at www.superchargersonline.com that ATI
pulled their entire forum off of the site lol!
car. Not very good statistics for ATI.
They had so many complaints at the forum at www.superchargersonline.com that ATI
pulled their entire forum off of the site lol!
My vortech was running 9psi on the Z and it never had a problem.
I am thinking i may wait for Vortech to release their kit for the C6...
By the way incredible driving too! Awesome video and great color choice!!
Def interested to see where this goes!!!
#28
Melting Slicks
Originally Posted by valdeztke
I had a 2004 350Z and was running the vortech. I didnt go with the ATI because of this
The Z though did have Alum ( very weak ) internals and a 10.3:1 Comp..
My vortech was running 9psi on the Z and it never had a problem.
The Z though did have Alum ( very weak ) internals and a 10.3:1 Comp..
My vortech was running 9psi on the Z and it never had a problem.
#34
Originally Posted by C6 ROLLER
What's the RWHP for this set-up. I have a procharger with 6 pounds of boost pushing 503 RWHP@6100. I was wondering what my times would be. Before you say it I'm going to take it to the track but I was looking for a reference time.
#35
Former Vendor
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 18,673
Received 393 Likes
on
286 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12'-'13-'14-'15
Originally Posted by flynbyu82
One could geuss high 10's... but there's so many different variables it's hard to say
Need an update with 11 psi. Really curious to see if it will take that pressure????????????/
Cajun
#36
Le Mans Master
damn, thats awesome
#37
Drifting
Purge or Sweep
Originally Posted by tlaselva
Was there anyone beside you?
Sounds like I heard a nos purge twice just at the staging lights....
Nice run!
Sounds like I heard a nos purge twice just at the staging lights....
Nice run!
#38
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1FASTC6
The rear wheels are 16" stock silver Camaro wheels with 28" Mickey Thompson ET streets. Had to do some grinding to make them fit b/c it was rubbing the upper mount. We also had to raise the rear ride height a couple of inches for tire clearance. That was just a simple turn of two bolts though. Had some troubles with the computer making it impossible to remove the car from traction control mode b/c I don't have the sensors in the drag wheel setup. It only did that when I do a big burn out before the run. Hopefully the new tuning for the 11 PSI pulley we corrected that problem and I won't need the sensors.
#40
I agree...nice numbers and what sounded like a nos purge was indeed the track official sweeping the burnout box. Those sounds can be quite similar, but we also didn't see nitrous being sprayed in to the atmosphere via the purge valve.
Either way, impressive!
Either way, impressive!