How much power?
LS2 stock bottom end,
D1SC 8 rib
Innovator's west oversized 8 rib upgrade pulley.
(8lb pulley on head unit and a couple extra lbs with the balancer}.
1 3/4 LG headers, magnaflows
317 heads (lower the compression)
LS7 head gaskets (slightly thicker thna others)
ARP head studs, arp cam bolts, balancer bolts.
Upgrade oil pump
boostapump
Methanol injection
Harland Sharp (pedestal rockers)
Manley double spring setup, tit retainers
ECS 346 blower can
160 thermostat
Stock LS2 TB & intake.
At this point it looks like Arun@champion is gonna do the tune......
safety will be a priority....
Any guesses as to how much WHP we can make?
Man, what an adrenaline rush putting together a high powered build....relatively speaking.
Hoping for plenty of early torque.

chris


LS2 stock bottom end,
D1SC 8 rib
Innovator's west oversized 8 rib upgrade pulley.
(8lb pulley on head unit and a couple extra lbs with the balancer}.
1 3/4 LG headers, magnaflows
317 heads (lower the compression)
LS7 head gaskets (slightly thicker thna others)
ARP head studs, arp cam bolts, balancer bolts.
Upgrade oil pump
boostapump
Methanol injection
Harland Sharp (pedestal rockers)
Manley double spring setup, tit retainers
ECS 346 blower can
160 thermostat
Stock LS2 TB & intake.
At this point it looks like Arun@champion is gonna do the tune......
safety will be a priority....
Any guesses as to how much WHP we can make?
Man, what an adrenaline rush putting together a high powered build....relatively speaking.
Hoping for plenty of early torque.

chris
As far as plenty of early torque... You are dropping compression and putting a cam in it; if you wanted low end torque you'd be better off with a smaller blower and stock compression.
My 2 cents worth...
As far as plenty of early torque... You are dropping compression and putting a cam in it; if you wanted low end torque you'd be better off with a smaller blower and stock compression.
My 2 cents worth...
Was thinking I would only make 550 to 600 WHP. It is a baby blower cam.
Methanol will be another safety factor.....again relatively speaking.
Sincere thanx for the advise....car is apart already and kinda have made my bed.

chris
Last edited by Jutskin; Apr 9, 2009 at 09:31 AM.


Was thinking I would only make 550 to 600 WHP. It is a baby blower cam.
Methanol will be another safety factor.....again relatively speaking.
Sincere thanx for the advise....car is apart already and kinda have made my bed.

chris
Nothing will cost you more low end torque and engine responsiveness than dropping the compression. The ONLY reason to drop compression in an engine is if you are unable to run as much boost as you want to meet your power goals at the stock compression level: dropping compression allows more boost to be run which makes it possible to make more power, at the trade off of reduced fuel consumption, reduced low end torque, and reduced responsiveness. Since you have a stock bottom end, you will not be able to benefit from the potential to make more power, but you WILL see the trade offs.
Same thing with the cam... Cams work by shifting where peak volumetric efficiency occurs in an engine. I.E. They trade low end torque for more torque at the top where it translates into power gains. On a stock bottom end you can make as much or more power than is safe for the engine with the stock cam, so you really don't need a blower cam.
Your build has all the elements of a high peak hp race motor, except for the botom end... I would either forge the bottom end and go for the high peak HP the other stuff you got will be good for, or I would reconsider some of those choices in light of your real goals...
Nothing will cost you more low end torque and engine responsiveness than dropping the compression. The ONLY reason to drop compression in an engine is if you are unable to run as much boost as you want to meet your power goals at the stock compression level: dropping compression allows more boost to be run which makes it possible to make more power, at the trade off of reduced fuel consumption, reduced low end torque, and reduced responsiveness. Since you have a stock bottom end, you will not be able to benefit from the potential to make more power, but you WILL see the trade offs.
Same thing with the cam... Cams work by shifting where peak volumetric efficiency occurs in an engine. I.E. They trade low end torque for more torque at the top where it translates into power gains. On a stock bottom end you can make as much or more power than is safe for the engine with the stock cam, so you really don't need a blower cam.
Your build has all the elements of a high peak hp race motor, except for the botom end... I would either forge the bottom end and go for the high peak HP the other stuff you got will be good for, or I would reconsider some of those choices in light of your real goals...
You have persuaded me to go to the thinner gasket than what we ordered, compression will be about 10:1 vs the 9:5 with the thicker head gasket. Too late for the heads....in the shop.....and the bottom end....well I hope it will last for a couple years. It will be a super safe tune. Let us pray.
Will post results in about a week.
Thanx Sam.
Car will make plenty of power for a stock LS2 bottom end, ...no real need for heads?
If this thread was a few weeks earlier we would have had a deal for your heads. Spending coin too rebuilding the 317's with high end manley components....... I coulda saved some major coin. Thanx anyway.

chris
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
John's heads would enable you to make more power at a lower boost level. This translates to less stress on your bottom-end which means a longer life. You may or may not know this but I just wanted you to understand the benefits of going with something like what he offered.
Nothing will cost you more low end torque and engine responsiveness than dropping the compression. The ONLY reason to drop compression in an engine is if you are unable to run as much boost as you want to meet your power goals at the stock compression level: dropping compression allows more boost to be run which makes it possible to make more power, at the trade off of reduced fuel consumption, reduced low end torque, and reduced responsiveness. Since you have a stock bottom end, you will not be able to benefit from the potential to make more power, but you WILL see the trade offs.
Same thing with the cam... Cams work by shifting where peak volumetric efficiency occurs in an engine. I.E. They trade low end torque for more torque at the top where it translates into power gains. On a stock bottom end you can make as much or more power than is safe for the engine with the stock cam, so you really don't need a blower cam.
Your build has all the elements of a high peak hp race motor, except for the botom end... I would either forge the bottom end and go for the high peak HP the other stuff you got will be good for, or I would reconsider some of those choices in light of your real goals...
Mid range is good.....and regularly useable.So many variables to make a build work well and your chosen parts working effectively together.
As far as plenty of early torque... You are dropping compression and putting a cam in it; if you wanted low end torque you'd be better off with a smaller blower and stock compression.
My 2 cents worth...
Thanks in advance

If you're going to be happy with 700 RWHP, then forget about forging the bottom end.
Your car is going to be absolutely ungodly just as it will be delivered!

If you're going to be happy with 700 RWHP, then forget about forging the bottom end.
Your car is going to be absolutely ungodly just as it will be delivered!


Then I might want to forge with the juice

Funny thing Ive heard this somewhere before but i can't remeber who it was from, run meth and race gas and then spray it.
Thats what i was planning on doing
Problem for me is that im on a budget, and i know my personality, after like 6 months im going to probablly want more power. I hear 600-620rwhp is max on LS7 NA motor. So thats why Im leaning towards the SC route.
Alot of pro's and cons with each. H/C NA with N20 is Drive ability and bad gas mileage(But i love that mean rumble from a big cam). SC is cost and over heating can be a problem down here in South Florida.
Also I would go SC all the way if there was a tire out there that is worth a crap from a dead stop WOT with 700+rwhp.
I have no idea how you can drive yours with 1000+

Thanks for the help pal
My pleasure!
Hey, I will tell you - you have a solid plan...
The BEST car I've ever owned was my Heads/Cam/Header/Heads/Tune/Nitrous C6Z with a drag radial on it.
The car had the nasty "old school" cam hitting a lick, without the nitrous would walk away from a 600cc bike, on the nitrous would pull away from a 'busa on the highway, would still get 25 MPG and was just as reliable as it was from the factory.
The only advice I can give you is this: Go with a wet shot. 175 MAX (on the stock bottom end) and make sure your fuel pressure doesn't drop with a shot of nitrous as big as 175. That will be right on the edge of what a stock fuel system can keep up with! Also, make sure you keep your timing reasonably low!! You will put down 750-760 RWHP and about 850 lbs-ft of torque if you spray at 2500 RPM.

I have several 1,000+ RWHP rides and I'm here to tell you - this was my FAVORITE car of all time! It was such a lethal combination and SO simple (and cheap to do...)... Good luck!
LS2 stock bottom end,
D1SC 8 rib
Innovator's west oversized 8 rib upgrade pulley.
(8lb pulley on head unit and a couple extra lbs with the balancer}.
1 3/4 LG headers, magnaflows
317 heads (lower the compression)
LS7 head gaskets (slightly thicker thna others)
ARP head studs, arp cam bolts, balancer bolts.
Upgrade oil pump
boostapump
Methanol injection
Harland Sharp (pedestal rockers)
Manley double spring setup, tit retainers
ECS 346 blower can
160 thermostat
Stock LS2 TB & intake.
At this point it looks like Arun@champion is gonna do the tune......
safety will be a priority....
Any guesses as to how much WHP we can make?
Man, what an adrenaline rush putting together a high powered build....relatively speaking.
Hoping for plenty of early torque.

chris
650 RWHP is about as far as your fuel system will take you-after that it's just a bandaid with meth. Those 20's of yours are gonna cry all day, everyday with the 20's-beleive me!
Your gonna wanna put a blower on the Chevelle after this!
Arun will take good care of you... just follow his lead...











