When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Example:
14.68 Stoich / 11.6 PE = 1.265. You would input 1.26
Jeff, I understand that and it fits for 100% gasoline but what I'm asking is how should I tune in HP Tuners for something other than 14.68 100% gasoline? Do I base my math for the PE table off of the new stoich value of my other than 100% gasoline? And secondly, it sounds as if the typical widebands are translating the voltage to a displayed AFR value based off of an assumed 14.68 100% gasoline giving me a false indication of what the AFR really is.
And secondly, it sounds as if the typical widebands are translating the voltage to a displayed AFR value based off of an assumed 14.68 100% gasoline giving me a false indication of what the AFR really is.
Correct. That happens with all wide band O2s.
And what you want to work with is PE. You want it 20% richer than stoichometric, you enter 1.20. (Assuming that everything else is calibrated correctly for the fuel you use)
From: Greater Detroit Metro MI, when I'm not travelling.
Originally Posted by Motorhead-47
Jeff, I understand that and it fits for 100% gasoline but what I'm asking is how should I tune in HP Tuners for something other than 14.68 100% gasoline? Do I base my math for the PE table off of the new stoich value of my other than 100% gasoline? And secondly, it sounds as if the typical widebands are translating the voltage to a displayed AFR value based off of an assumed 14.68 100% gasoline giving me a false indication of what the AFR really is.
You have to tell your wideband what fuel you are using...
You have to tell your wideband what fuel you are using...
Yep...That is kind of where I was trying to go with the question. This would probably be easier on the head if I had the wideband reporting a lambda value and focus on tuning to a lambda number.
Yep...That is kind of where I was trying to go with the question. This would probably be easier on the head if I had the wideband reporting a lambda value and focus on tuning to a lambda number.
Or better yet, make it show EQ. In that case the PE values and what your wideband show should be inline if the calibration is correct.
Yep...That is kind of where I was trying to go with the question. This would probably be easier on the head if I had the wideband reporting a lambda value and focus on tuning to a lambda number.
All widebands read O2 voltage so you can assign the lambda value 1 to be 9.76 instead of 14.7 but it isnt nec. You can tune the same way. Going for say E85's WOT value of 7.45 is the same as 14.7 stoic going for 11.25:1. Both are going to read the same percentage lower for the stoic value. So if you have the stoic set to 9.76, your wideband shows 14.7 for the stoic because thats lambda=1.
9.76/7.45= 1.31
14.7/11.25= 1.306
Its the same percentage change so 11.25:1 on the meter then corresponds to 7.45 with E85. (ethanol actually likes being a bit richer than a gas tune on my car)
Its the same percentage so change the stoic to 9.76 for E85 or 10.63 for E70 and use your wideband as you alway do. With the E85 you will still see 11:1 at WOT no matter what fuel you're running.
The LM-1 from innovate lets you read the actual stoic you want for lambda=1 but I dont do it because when I'm driving around using E20 or E30 or E10, I know when I see 11:1 on my pillar gauge, i'm at the right a/f ratio without having to learn new numbers. Why confuse yourself with seasonal E70 to E85 values when you know what the correct readings would be if it was gas.
Last edited by SpinMonster; Feb 12, 2010 at 06:10 AM.
I use it, made 1132 rwhp... Aeromotive fuel pumps are compatible.
I race on E98 and drive on E85 no issues so far. Better cooling, cheaper cost (paying ~$3 per gallong for E98) and getting C16 power without killing wideband sensors.
I use it, made 1132 rwhp... Aeromotive fuel pumps are compatible.
I race on E98 and drive on E85 no issues so far. Better cooling, cheaper cost (paying ~$3 per gallong for E98) and getting C16 power without killing wideband sensors.
Conversion wasn't difficult.
What fuel system are you running? Its insane to support that much on E85.
I use it, made 1132 rwhp... Aeromotive fuel pumps are compatible.
I race on E98 and drive on E85 no issues so far. Better cooling, cheaper cost (paying ~$3 per gallong for E98) and getting C16 power without killing wideband sensors.
Conversion wasn't difficult.
Are you finding the engine running cooler? maybe lower oil temps to?
on the subject of oil, is anyone worried about washing the bores as you are putting soo much fuel in to make the really big numbers?......
Are you finding the engine running cooler? maybe lower oil temps to?
on the subject of oil, is anyone worried about washing the bores as you are putting soo much fuel in to make the really big numbers?......
Chris.
Oil analysis would be needed to see what amount of fuel is getting past the rings but I'd imagine any decent running low mile motor is fine as long as you dont get silly with boost before full thermal expansion at optimum running temperature is reached. More frequent oil changes would be wise in any performance build especially as mileage climbs. Fuel isnt a good lubricant unless we're talking about nitrometh radio controlled cars.
Oil analysis would be needed to see what amount of fuel is getting past the rings but I'd imagine any decent running low mile motor is fine as long as you dont get silly with boost before full thermal expansion at optimum running temperature is reached. More frequent oil changes would be wise in any performance build especially as mileage climbs. Fuel isnt a good lubricant unless we're talking about nitrometh radio controlled cars.
We do change the oil much more frequently. Haven't had any issues with fuel in the oil.
My fuel system was designed by IPSMotorsports.net and my motor was built with E85 in mind. The car does run cooler and Oil temps are cooler as well.
I've not had any issues related to the Ethanol.
Thats very intresting that you see a reduction in oil and engine temps. Maybe E85 is a 'better' fuel than people first think, esp in applications where engine temps can be a real problem!.....
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.