displacement vs boost







Last edited by aTX427; Oct 8, 2010 at 09:58 AM.





did you mean your statement for the 427 in the sense that that large of displacement weakens the block or that I will want more boost?
im looking for combos to produce 900-1000 rwhp
did you mean your statement for the 427 in the sense that that large of displacement weakens the block or that I will want more boost?
im looking for combos to produce 900-1000 rwhp
The LSx454 can handle up to 2050 HP. Later on, if you want more horsepower, put in a set of lower compression pistons and up the boost. Plenty on meat in the heads for some serious porting.
http://gmtv.feedroom.com/?fr_story=e...47e&rf=sitemap
Last edited by JoesC5; Oct 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM.


Also, seeing as the internals are what fails on these engines, all the iron block is doing is weighting more; it is no "safer" on an engine that is detonating on pump gas with high compression than an aluminum block would be, since the pistons are what is going to break in that scenario. The iron block CAN handle a lot more power, but what the OP is asking about is not a 2000HP engine; the lower end of his power goal has been reached on stock LS blocks even.
Finally why 6 bolt heads if you've got a huge engine running small amounts of boost; the added clamping is needed when cylinder pressure becomes very high, which is exactly what you are avoiding by going with a large cubic inch motor. The 6 bolt mains are nice, but not required.
A 454 cubic inch motor with a sensible compression ratio (say, 9.8:1 => 10:1) and some boost would be your best bet at 900 - 1000WHP on pump gas. You'd want great heads, all forged internals and a good blower cam. It would be easier to do it with turbos too. The block does not have to be made of iron; a sleeved LS motor, a C5R motor, an RHS block or an ERL Superdeck would all work without the 110lbs weight penalty... Sure, it'll cost more, but I'd pay 2 grand to not have a boat anchor under my hood.
My 2 cents worth.
Last edited by PowerLabs; Oct 8, 2010 at 02:17 PM.





Also, seeing as the internals are what fails on these engines, all the iron block is doing is weighting more; it is no "safer" on an engine that is detonating on pump gas with high compression than an aluminum block would be, since the pistons are what is going to break in that scenario. The iron block CAN handle a lot more power, but what the OP is asking about is not a 2000HP engine; the lower end of his power goal has been reached on stock LS blocks even.
Finally why 6 bolt heads if you've got a huge engine running small amounts of boost; the added clamping is needed when cylinder pressure becomes very high, which is exactly what you are avoiding by going with a large cubic inch motor. The 6 bolt mains are nice, but not required.
A 454 cubic inch motor with a sensible compression ratio (say, 9.8:1 => 10:1) and some boost would be your best bet at 900 - 1000WHP on pump gas. You'd want great heads, all forged internals and a good blower cam. It would be easier to do it with turbos too. The block does not have to be made of iron; a sleeved LS motor, a C5R motor, an RHS block or an ERL Superdeck would all work without the 110lbs weight penalty... Sure, it'll cost more, but I'd pay 2 grand to not have a boat anchor under my hood.
My 2 cents worth.
question about octane: is a motors octane requirement based apon hp or boost or a factor of both? ie would a forged 427 at 16lbs live on 93?


did you mean your statement for the 427 in the sense that that large of displacement weakens the block or that I will want more boost?
im looking for combos to produce 900-1000 rwhp
900-1000hp is a nice goal, but most wind up closer in the 800-900hp because of the additional effort and $$$ it takes to support 1000hp.
Good luck with your build.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts


When the air/fuel charge is compressed inside your cylinder, its temperature rises in direct proportion to the compression ratio. That is also true when the air/fuel charge is compressed by a turbo or supercharger (it will heat up in direct proportion to the amount of boost, plus the efficiency loss of the blower), HOWEVER, when your turbo or supercharger compresses air and it heats up, that air can be intercooled, so you can have an intake charge that is twice as dense as ambient, but only 20% warmer... Since the density of the intake air charge times the size of your engine times the engine determines how much power you can make (very simplified concept here), more boost will always equal more power.
Hope that makes sense, I'm on my second sixpack





When the air/fuel charge is compressed inside your cylinder, its temperature rises in direct proportion to the compression ratio. That is also true when the air/fuel charge is compressed by a turbo or supercharger (it will heat up in direct proportion to the amount of boost, plus the efficiency loss of the blower), HOWEVER, when your turbo or supercharger compresses air and it heats up, that air can be intercooled, so you can have an intake charge that is twice as dense as ambient, but only 20% warmer... Since the density of the intake air charge times the size of your engine times the engine determines how much power you can make (very simplified concept here), more boost will always equal more power.
Hope that makes sense, I'm on my second sixpack











