When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've never had my 1.8 gallon methanol tank last over 4 tanks of gas. 4psi is what, 3000RPM? You never floor your car beyond that?
I just did a 2200 mile trip only used about a gallon of meth. no need for me to be in the throttle that hard on a long trip, cruising at 70 mph its only about 2000 rpm and I can pass with out going over 3500 rpm and still hit 100 mph. I could use 2.5 gallons in 10 miles if I wanted. I have used a tank full in 8, 1/8 runs but point here is it works just fine for me and others, its like any thing you have to use some control and common sense. if your on a long trip don,t get stupid with the throttle.
From: Greater Detroit Metro MI, when I'm not travelling.
Originally Posted by wooden
I just did a 2200 mile trip only used about a gallon of meth. no need for me to be in the throttle that hard on a long trip, cruising at 70 mph its only about 2000 rpm and I can pass with out going over 3500 rpm and still hit 100 mph. I could use 2.5 gallons in 10 miles if I wanted. I have used a tank full in 8, 1/8 runs but point here is it works just fine for me and others, its like any thing you have to use some control and common sense. if your on a long trip don,t get stupid with the throttle.
IMHO having to baby a car because I'm driving far and am afraid of running out completely defeats the purpose of building it up in the first place. If I wanted to not go over 3500RPM I would have kept it stock, saved a ton of money, netted better fuel economy, and ended up with a more reliable car overall. I want a car I can use everywhere, and Methanol does take away some of that: that was the point I was trying to make.
Come to think of it, I think if my ambitions of driving involved not using the throttle I would have probably picked something more practical/cheaper/more comfortable than a blown Corvette?
IMHO having to baby a car because I'm driving far and am afraid of running out completely defeats the purpose of building it up in the first place. If I wanted to not go over 3500RPM I would have kept it stock, saved a ton of money, netted better fuel economy, and ended up with a more reliable car overall. I want a car I can use everywhere, and Methanol does take away some of that: that was the point I was trying to make.
Come to think of it, I think if my ambitions of driving involved not using the throttle I would have probably picked something more practical/cheaper/more comfortable than a blown Corvette?
ever think about adjusting how early/fast/strong the meth comes in. 3500 rpms seems kinda low to be needing meth.
From: Greater Detroit Metro MI, when I'm not travelling.
Originally Posted by carlrx7
ever think about adjusting how early/fast/strong the meth comes in. 3500 rpms seems kinda low to be needing meth.
Mine comes on @ 4psi... Seems about right? I have contemplating reducing the spray size, from 2x 10lbs/hr nozzles to maybe one 10 pound and 1 5lbs/hr nozzle. Spraying 10% of my fuel charge as methanol seems excessive... I wish I had the time to experiment with this on the dyno but work has kept me so busy I can't even get a haircut lately, let alone spend hours tuning a car :-/
Anyone out there run meth injection without a blower. I am not real familiar with the meth injection setup, but I have mainly seen it on blown cars. Is there no benefit to a NA C6? I'm assuming it's just a cool the intake charge from the blower?
Well after all those replies!!! did you happen to get a answer to your question.. If so, would you please translate it back to me?? because I was wondering about Meth Injection also..