Tuning software?
Go and try to get SCT software to tune your car with for Ford. You will see a tax!!!
Oh well, they must be doing something right, because they're still in business and still very popular.
Once I finally did start tuning & learning, etc it became very rewarding very quickly. I befriended many self tuners and ask questions when I had one and then posted information that I gathered as I went. I can only share my knowledge & the things I've read on the forums for the past 4 or so years but I will say tuning my own vehicles has been one of the most rewarding things I've done.
Tuning is rarely cut and dry and more of an art than science and the tunershops you'll come across spend thousands of hours on the dyno doing R&D work. Nothing is learned in a days time when it comes to tuning anyone that tells you otherwise is probably lying to you. But if you are a hands on person and like that feeling at the end of a mod or build tuning might be right for you if you can dedicate the time to learning how to use the tool. The welding analogy is a very good one as all the books & video's in the world don't make a welder, a steady hand & lots of practice do though.
Its the same with tuning as its all about learning how to use the tool and then practicing. And like welding its always good if you have a teacher that can help you hands on. Places like the tuning school & calibrated success are a great place to start. Companies that also sell starter tunes like ragin' racing can also be a big help since you can compare their tune to your stocker and see what they changed, these will usually get you going in the right direction to build on.
Last edited by foff667; Feb 17, 2009 at 11:34 AM.





HP Tuners has 8 full time employees meaning ~20,000 man hours per year going into development of our software to make it accessible & simple enough to use for the average Joe. With basic descriptions of each table and what they do, custom operating systems, a fully integrated scanner that can be used on every vehicle we support as well as many that we don't have listed on our supported list, etc.
I'm saying it's a great piece of software but NOT written OR supported for the average Joe. Anyone marketing it as such should be held accountable for all the problems that follow.
Again, I like the software and am learning more each month. But I'm a stickler for truth in advertising and saying HPT was developed for the Average Joe is really pushing it. Handheld programmers are made for the average Joe. Average Joes WILL have lots of questions regarding tuning and HPT is NOT setup to handle those questions. They support the tool not your tuning ability.
Last edited by C5pilot; Feb 17, 2009 at 06:21 PM.
There is a learning curve depending on the application some more steep than others but all doable.
-Bill
So are you agreeing with me that novices shouldn't expect a whole lot of support and be prepared for a "steep" learning curve or are you agreeing with foff667 that's HPT is geared towards the "Average Joe"?
I'm saying it's a great piece of software but NOT written OR supported for the average Joe. Anyone marketing it as such should be held accountable for all the problems that follow.
Again, I like the software and am learning more each month. But I'm a stickler for truth in advertising and saying HPT was developed for the Average Joe is really pushing it. Handheld programmers are made for the average Joe. Average Joes WILL have lots of questions regarding tuning and HPT is NOT setup to handle those questions. They support the tool not your tuning ability.

There is a learning curve depending on the application some more steep than others but all doable.
-Bill
The same could be said for doing your own income taxes.
For example, when I was in my 20's, I taught myself automotive paint and body work. Was I any good at first? No. But after a while, I got better. In total, I repainted about 20 cars which some came out pretty nice. Do I have the same skills as a professional that does it everyday? Some yes, and others probably not.
The same could be said for Tuning Software. If someone wants to learn it, it takes a time and effort to learn the basics. Learning the theory is important. If you don't want to learn that, I suggest not buying it.
Have some people bought it and found it took too much effort to learn or lost interest? I would think so.
Is the software for the DIY as well as the professional? I think so since there are a number of enthusiast on the HP Forum that are obviously doing it on their own cars. Go out and buy the Greg Banish book for $25 and after reading it, if you still want to buy software, then go for it.
When I got HP Tuners in December, I felt overwhelmed at first. But I kept reading and talking to people. Now I feel at least like I can do it.
The days of the histogram made life 100X easier. LS1 Edit was horrible at best and talk about ZERO support.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





You guys like comparisons, fine. An average Joe can fly an airplane too. Heck, all you need to do is study some books for many hours, get a physical, take some tests that would look like gibberish before you ever read the books, and then go practice some take-offs and landings.
Oh wait, if you did all that AND SURVIVE you wouldn't be an average Joe anymore, you'd be a pilot.
And if you did all the pre-requisites for HPT you'd be a tuner... where's the difference?
You guys like comparisons, fine. An average Joe can fly an airplane too. Heck, all you need to do is study some books for many hours, get a physical, take some tests that would look like gibberish before you ever read the books, and then go practice some take-offs and landings.
Oh wait, if you did all that AND SURVIVE you wouldn't be an average Joe anymore, you'd be a pilot.
And if you did all the pre-requisites for HPT you'd be a tuner... where's the difference?
There is a learning curve depending on the application some more steep than others but all doable.
-Bill
Does the average joe learn how to drink from a straw? yes
Can the average joe learn how to tune? yes
You guys like comparisons, fine. An average Joe can fly an airplane too. Heck, all you need to do is study some books for many hours, get a physical, take some tests that would look like gibberish before you ever read the books, and then go practice some take-offs and landings.
Oh wait, if you did all that AND SURVIVE you wouldn't be an average Joe anymore, you'd be a pilot.
And if you did all the pre-requisites for HPT you'd be a tuner... where's the difference?
If you are not a DIY type of person who is willing to do a little reading then you are not the type of person who is going to "get it."
The average Joe here is not the average dumbass. It involves a laptop and an engine with lots of moving parts. You need a decent foundation of how things operate or you will be lost.
I think the HP Tuners suite is excellent. I can see room for improvement, but it is well thought out and makes things almost as easy as can be.

The people on this forum for the most part are at least computer literate. I still recommend joining the HP Tuners forum and getting one of the books on EFI tuning. If you still feel compelled to try it, then you probably will be satisfied with your decision.
The really easy to use handheld is not going to give you an expert tune, and most of the time you are going to get a way better tune with HPTuner or EFILive, which makes them well worth the money.
And there is no Corvette tax on the tuners, if anything you might call it American Car Tax or maybe GM tax, I paid the same price to get HPT for my Grand Prix and you will for your Corvette.



















