C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Traction System Problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #1  
Burple_X's Avatar
Burple_X
Thread Starter
Advanced
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Kernersville NC
Default Traction System Problem

On two occassions now, my car has thrown the Traction System Active message when I just rolling down the highway. Both time I was running just above 70mph. When the message comes on, the car slows to 70mph. I can manually turn off the traction control and all is fine again.

Last week I spent $800 for the dealer to replace the tire sensors in my aftermarket wheels. He was sure that was causing the problem . The car did the same thing this weekend with the proper (new) sensors in the wheels. So much for that theory!

Has anyone else experienced this? According to the GM dealer, it could be "any one of a hundred things" causing it. The car is about 2 months old now and has just over 2300 miles on it. The first time it did this was April 6. New sensors were put in on April 8. Then it did it again on April 10.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #2  
SunsetVette's Avatar
SunsetVette
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Macomb twp Michigan
Default

on my c6 my tracton control went bad it said service traction system though, and they really couldnt figure out what was wrong they switched a sensor somewhere and it didnt fix it when i start the car up and if its wet out and the tire break loose the traction control goes out and sais service traction system i even brought my car in to show them the light on so they didnt think i was crazy all i can say is im upset and youll have to just keep taking it back to them try and get your 800 dollars back too
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #3  
EHS's Avatar
EHS
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 14,542
Likes: 5
Default

Tire sizes please.

In other words, is there a greater than 10% difference between the circumference, front to back?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 09:27 PM
  #4  
Burple_X's Avatar
Burple_X
Thread Starter
Advanced
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Kernersville NC
Default Tire sizes

Originally Posted by EHS
Tire sizes please.

In other words, is there a greater than 10% difference between the circumference, front to back?
275/35 ZR 18 Front
305/30 ZR 19 Rear

They have been on the car for over 2k miles and the traction system problem just started.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:03 AM
  #5  
haljensen's Avatar
haljensen
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 25
From: Austin Texas
Default

You have your Active Handling computer confused.
Stock front 25.72" dia. to your front of 25.58" dia. Close, .24" smaller

Stock rear 26.85 dia. to your rear of 26.2" dia. Not close, .65" smaller

My understanding of the active Handling is that it measures tire rotation and applies the brakes to even things out . I have no idea what tolerances the computer works on but you have made a major circumference change. Only 1/2 % smaller in the front but 2.4% smaller in the back.

Might be easier to understand if we look at the tires at 75MPH;
Front stock=980rpm Front changed=986rpm; only 6rpm diff.
Rear stock=939rpm Rear changed= 962rpm; 23rpm diff.

Maybe get a larger diameter rear OR a smaller diameter front?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 10:56 AM
  #6  
smdio's Avatar
smdio
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 1
Default

had the car for 6 weeks, 640 miles, no problems like that at all
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #7  
CDH76's Avatar
CDH76
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 85
From: DFW Texas
Default

Just curious, why did you have to pay $800 for a car that is under warranty?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 11:50 AM
  #8  
vrodder64's Avatar
vrodder64
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by haljensen
You have your Active Handling computer confused.
Stock front 25.72" dia. to your front of 25.58" dia. Close, .24" smaller

Stock rear 26.85 dia. to your rear of 26.2" dia. Not close, .65" smaller

My understanding of the active Handling is that it measures tire rotation and applies the brakes to even things out . I have no idea what tolerances the computer works on but you have made a major circumference change. Only 1/2 % smaller in the front but 2.4% smaller in the back.

Might be easier to understand if we look at the tires at 75MPH;
Front stock=980rpm Front changed=986rpm; only 6rpm diff.
Rear stock=939rpm Rear changed= 962rpm; 23rpm diff.

Maybe get a larger diameter rear OR a smaller diameter front?
Then why would the problem start after 2300 miles of driving. If the diameter was too different, wouldn't the problem start right away.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:17 PM
  #9  
Burple_X's Avatar
Burple_X
Thread Starter
Advanced
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Kernersville NC
Default

Originally Posted by CoolShoesWalkin
Just curious, why did you have to pay $800 for a car that is under warranty?
Aftermarket wheels (Ronals) that I bought for my C5 last fall. When I bought the C6, I swapped wheels without changing sensors. No one knows why, but the C5 sensors continued to read on the C6. The only explanation GM had was the C6 stored the last readings from the original wheels and that was what was displaying. That's why I had to install new sensors and pay for them. That was "supposed" to correct the problem. It didn't!
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:20 PM
  #10  
Burple_X's Avatar
Burple_X
Thread Starter
Advanced
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Kernersville NC
Default

Originally Posted by vrodder64
Then why would the problem start after 2300 miles of driving. If the diameter was too different, wouldn't the problem start right away.
Yeah, and I would also like to know why the problem is intermittant. I can't make the problem reoccur for the mechanic. I drove 200 miles Sunday and it only did it one time. That included stopping and turning the car off a couple times too. So, the same opportunity for it to happen should have been there several times.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 11:15 PM
  #11  
haljensen's Avatar
haljensen
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 25
From: Austin Texas
Default

Originally Posted by vrodder64
Then why would the problem start after 2300 miles of driving. If the diameter was too different, wouldn't the problem start right away.
No one knows the computer standards. Maybe it only samples after so many key turns? Or so many hours of operation (cumulative)? Maybe the difference doesn't register at certain speeds?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #12  
Zig's Avatar
Zig
Safety Car
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,565
Likes: 5
From: stafford country, va. Avatar: Me on turn 3 @ Bristol (The World's Fastest Half-Mile)
Default

Originally Posted by Burple_X
Yeah, and I would also like to know why the problem is intermittant. I can't make the problem reoccur for the mechanic. I drove 200 miles Sunday and it only did it one time. That included stopping and turning the car off a couple times too. So, the same opportunity for it to happen should have been there several times.
i had this problem a couple of times, always when the roads are either wet / damp / or sandy (salted).

once i was playing with a 350z (around 75 mph) and it tripped, it started bucking wildly like a real bad miss, then the DIC said "service traction system" and my traction light came on. I had to turn the whole system off so i could continue to play.

it resets after shuting down the car.

the other time it did it when I had my girlfriend in the car and i got on it a bit from a stand still, i was pulling out from some gravel.

The workaround I use is whenever it's damp I turn off the traction control, I know that kinda defeats the purpose of having it but I don't want to leave the car at the dealer until they fireu out what the prob is.

the first time it happened I hit onstar and they told me there was something wrong with the ABS and I needed to take in in right away. I did and they couldn't find anything, since I shut off the car and it reset.....
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 11:24 AM
  #13  
mlongo99's Avatar
mlongo99
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 2
From: Goleta CA
Cruise-In VIII Veteran
Default

The tire diameter difference sure sounds like it may be contributing to your problem, at least in part. Being intermittent sure makes it a lot harder to diagnose. Have you driven at speeds over 75 since it started happening? And is there anything else that you modified? Did it occur with the wheels straight or turned? I'm wondering if the tire changes are just barely significant enough to make the computer activate TC/AH at freeway speed while going aroung a slight curve.

Hope you get this figured out soon.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 11:57 AM
  #14  
EHS's Avatar
EHS
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 14,542
Likes: 5
Default

Here is a link that is a must read:

http://www.geocities.com/nosro/abs_faq/

See the section on:

What happens if I install aftermarket tires, wheels, brake linings, calipers, springs, . . . ?

Part of what it says:

"It is anybody's guess. Tires and brake linings are fairly safe items to experiment with. Having said this, I will point out that I am familiar with at least one case where the installation of high performance tires (where smooth-riding all-season tires were original equipment) resulted in a reaction with the suspension that ABS had not been tuned to anticipate. In this case, the installation of high performance tires resulted in significantly longer stopping distances because the extra tire stickiness was causing the front suspension to literally bounce off the jounce bumpers repeatedly, causing very violent changes in tire grip that ABS was not expecting. From a strictly ABS standpoint, it is best to stick with a tire, wheel, or brake lining that is similar in characteristic to the original equipment parts, or at least similar to any of the parts that are available as an option on that vehicle."

That's why OEM Z06 wheels and tires on my C5 convertible was as far as I felt I should go.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 01:59 PM
  #15  
Burple_X's Avatar
Burple_X
Thread Starter
Advanced
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Kernersville NC
Default

Originally Posted by mlongo99
The tire diameter difference sure sounds like it may be contributing to your problem, at least in part. Being intermittent sure makes it a lot harder to diagnose. Have you driven at speeds over 75 since it started happening? And is there anything else that you modified? Did it occur with the wheels straight or turned? I'm wondering if the tire changes are just barely significant enough to make the computer activate TC/AH at freeway speed while going aroung a slight curve. <snip>
I just picked the car up about an hour ago. The service tech told me that GM said not to spend any more time on the car until I put the stock tires/wheels back on the car! They "think" (maybe more accurately "guess") that the problem is coming from differences in tire circumference as previously theorized in this thread.

To answer your questions... Both times it has done this (1) I was on perfectly dry, flat road (interstate 77), (2) I was rolling down the road in a straight line at a constant speed and (3) I was not horsing around spinning tires, swerving, etc... Each time I was running just over 70mph. Both times when the Traction System Active warning came on, the car slowed to 70mph and would not accelerate past 70. Both times, I hit the traction control button to turn off the system and everything went back to normal.. except no traction control.

I am going to put the stock tires/wheels on the car before we head over to Bowling Green next Thursday. If it does it again, atleast I will be headed in the right direction for some answers!... maybe!!
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 02:04 PM
  #16  
Burple_X's Avatar
Burple_X
Thread Starter
Advanced
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Kernersville NC
Default

Originally Posted by EHS
Here is a link that is a must read:

http://www.geocities.com/nosro/abs_faq/
Good article, but so far my ABS hasn't been effected.. or atleast I haven't had the opportunity to test it. I would like to get all this sorted out though before I sign up for track days somewhere. Nothing worse than going to the track and working on your new car!
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #17  
vrodder64's Avatar
vrodder64
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Default

F55, Z51, or base suspension?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 07:35 PM
  #18  
haljensen's Avatar
haljensen
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 25
From: Austin Texas
Default

Interesting site for wheel/tire sizes.
http://gs.tolan-hoechst.com/tirecalc.htm
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #19  
Burple_X's Avatar
Burple_X
Thread Starter
Advanced
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Kernersville NC
Default

Originally Posted by vrodder64
F55, Z51, or base suspension?
Z51
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Traction System Problem





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-1
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette buyer's guide

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-17 16:41:08


VIEW MORE