When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Let me at lest say, you are very precise about what you don't know....
Not sure if that's a backhanded compliment or just an
observation but I've always found knowing what you don't
know to be not as common as one would think but
always more effective than the converse!
Originally Posted by mlongo99
I think you mean that the rate of angular acceleration changes not the MOI. After all MOI is the sum of the rotating masses multiplied by the square of the distance it acts from the axis. Unless you've got gear teeth flying off as it rotates that value is a constant. But you're definately right. This is a conservation of energy problem differentiated over time. Energy, or work, measured in joules, doesn't change. Flywheel - drivetrain = wheels
Thus, torque measurements shouldn't vary. But the question is power, which is work differentiated over time. This is Joules/second aka Watts, or with a conversion factor Hp to us Americans. Flywheel power is constant, drivetrain losses increase, and less power gets to the wheels.
Wow... I feel like I'm back in college again
I have to say that your last couple of posts have been
extremely clear and very useful. Thanks!
Not sure if that's a backhanded compliment or just an observation but I've always found knowing what you don't know to be not as common as one would think but always more effective than the converse!
Actually, I find it completely refreshing to encounter someone who knows quite precisely what they do not understand. My original statement was meant as a pure compliment with no insinuation of backhandedness whatsoever.