When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I know many sight using a 17" for lower gear ratio but if you check the overall dimensions of the tire the difference is not significant.
A 275/35/18 and a 275/40/17 are very nearly the same diameter. And the 275/45/17 is actually taller than the 275/35/18.
Is it because you want to run ET's instead of BFG's?
MT makes a 17" DR, they don't make an 18. The BFG's are nice, but the MTs pretty much put them to shame. Probably would look awkward on a vette though.
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12'-'13-'14-'15
Originally Posted by shurite44
Why are you going with a 17"?
I know many sight using a 17" for lower gear ratio but if you check the overall dimensions of the tire the difference is not significant.
A 275/35/18 and a 275/40/17 are very nearly the same diameter. And the 275/45/17 is actually taller than the 275/35/18.
Is it because you want to run ET's instead of BFG's?
The benefit of the 17" is that you have more sidewall for flex and better grip. 17s will not clear rear Z51 rotors but I am pretty sure they will clear base brakes. I would use a 17x11 with 275/40 if possible and if you can get a little higher profile then use that.
The benefit of the 17" is that you have more sidewall for flex and better grip. 17s will not clear rear Z51 rotors but I am pretty sure they will clear base brakes. I would use a 17x11 with 275/40 if possible and if you can get a little higher profile then use that.
Cajun
That makes sense, more sidewall, more flex.
I don't have the C6 but I am thinking about getting one. I still think if I am stock or fairly near stock I would just buy an extra set of front rims and run the BFG DR's.