difference between Z51 and stock?

Better/quicker acceleration, better handling, better braking. It also has a higher top speed, listed at 186mph.
The MN6 C6 Z51 offers very close to C5 Z06 performance if you are into competitive driving.
If you are into racing, it is worthy of note that the quickest running completely bone stock C6s on this forum are Z51s. Also, if you are into auto sports, the Z51 has better cooling capabilities than the base model.
Bear in mind that you are going to get a few opinions from people who do not actually own Z51 C6s and as such obviously cannot give you an accurate assessment of it.
One person here has owned both a MN6 base model with F55 and an MN6 Z51. His bone stock MN6 Z51 has turned out to be quicker on the strip than his mildly modified base/F55 C6.
So to answer your original question: "is there really that big of a difference between a regular c6 and Z51?"
In the manual transmissioned Z51, looking at the total package. Acceleration, braking, handling, cooling capabilities, top speed, if you drive competitively at all, then the answer is a resounding, definite "yes".




I have it.
If you plan on tires and rims just get the base corvette and add 3.90's or 4.10 gears to adjust performance to the same level.
What's important to you? Thats the question that really has to be answered in order to make the right choice.
What's important to you? Thats the question that really has to be answered in order to make the right choice.
Each of the three suspension setups has its own feel. The Z51 offers the tightest package, the F55 the most flexible, and the base the most economical and comfortable for all around use. They're all good and perform well. It's nothing more than personal preference.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts






Better/quicker acceleration, better handling, better braking. It also has a higher top speed, listed at 186mph.
With the power available through the more aggresive gearing of the MN6 Z51, and the softer performance tires of the Z51 package as opposed to the harder base model's runflat tires, it is small wonder that the tires of the Z51 wear a bit quicker than the base model's runflats.
The Z51 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th are all shorter. 4th is the same as the non-Z51. 5th gear is taller in the Z51.
I wonder though, is the 5th gear in the non-Z51 too short to hit 186 mph or is it just tall enough to actually be a real advantage over the Z51 cars? I don't believe the claimed 186 mph top speed is achieved at red line in the Z51.
The Z51 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th are all shorter. 4th is the same as the non-Z51. 5th gear is taller in the Z51.
I wonder though, is the 5th gear in the non-Z51 too short to hit 186 mph or is it just tall enough to actually be a real advantage over the Z51 cars? I don't believe the claimed 186 mph top speed is achieved at red line in the Z51.
Even easier scenario - there are speeds where the non-Z51 car can stay in a lower gear and have a higher (shorter) overall gear ratio than the Z51 car.
Gearing is "fake" horsepower. It's there sometimes, but it's no replacement for more power.
I wish I had the coolers from the Z51 package, but I'll be adding real power later, and will appreciate the taller gears of my non-Z51 car.
Gearing is "fake" horsepower. It's there sometimes, but it's no replacement for more power.
Since both cars come from the factory with 400 horsepower, I'll take the gearing of the Z51 and the "fake" horsepower.
Fake or not, traction equal, lower gears (higher number) give better acceleration.













