When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Does anyone build tri-y headers for the c6? Why or why not? It was my understanding that 4 into 1 headers were for high rpm, and tri-y made better torque. My honda s2000 had a tri-y and had a torque peak at 7500 rpm and a redline of 9000. It seems that would certainly be high enough for the c6. The honda also had a volumetric eficiency of about 110 % at that 7500, so tri-ys would seem to make sense. Any comments?
Thanks,
Roger
Does anyone build tri-y headers for the c6? Why or why not? It was my understanding that 4 into 1 headers were for high rpm, and tri-y made better torque. My honda s2000 had a tri-y and had a torque peak at 7500 rpm and a redline of 9000. It seems that would certainly be high enough for the c6. The honda also had a volumetric eficiency of about 110 % at that 7500, so tri-ys would seem to make sense. Any comments?
Thanks,
Roger
4 into 1 headers with short runners are indeed for high RPMs. However, 4 into 1 headers with long runners (which we call Long Tube Headers) can be tuned for the meat of the LS{1267} powerbands and boost the entire TQ band of these engines. If you look up some of the pre and post header dyno runs, you will see a general increase in the whole power band and not just a bump at the top end.