Need a little help on alignment ???
You don't need much - one turn on each side is around 1 degree of toe.
The lock nuts can be loosened and tightened without lifting the car, but its a knuckle-buster!
The front may want very little toe out or even some toe in - depending on how much negative camber you're running. It seems like it wants more toe in with more negative camber, especially in tight corners. I've found turn-in to be good at -1.0 degree camber and 0.1 degree toe in.
You'll probably want a fair amount of toe out on the back - on the order of 0.4 degrees or so.
Good luck!
To answer your question, in the front to toe-out you want to lengthen the tie rods by loosening the lock nuts on the female coupler and turning the flats (it's a hex) on the male rod. In the rear, to add toe-in loosen the nuts and turn the flats to lengthen the tie rods. To lengthen the rods you will be turning the wrench down on the right side and up on the left side of the car as you face the front or rear. CW & CCW always confuses me as it relative to your view. Remember to consider the rotation of the female coupler when you are counting the number of flats you turn the rod. Counting the flats will allow you to return easily to your street setting if you decide to add an aggressive amount of toe just for racing.
I found that after adding the Z06 bars my car needs some toe-in in the rear to counter the over rotation when pushing hard but YMMV. I'll know more in a month when our season begins again.
--Dan
Alignment specs : Toe
For autocrossing this will certainly help, for the street a little much.
Toe out in the front helps with initial turn-in... we will run as much as .250" out in the front depending upon the driver, the course, and grip. On the rear you may need as much a .300" toe-in... this helps with throttle over steer.( We have run as much as .500".)
The stock control arm bushings have a lot of compliance or compression, and with that said, alignment settings are aggressive in measurement to compensate for the give in a 53 durometer reading on the control arm bushings. With this soft of a bushing, you would be surprised as to how much the toe settings change during torque loading... (turning, stopping and power down)
Food for thought,
Vansteel
Alignment specs : Toe
For autocrossing this will certainly help, for the street a little much.
Toe out in the front helps with initial turn-in... we will run as much as .250" out in the front depending upon the driver, the course, and grip. On the rear you may need as much a .300" toe-in... this helps with throttle over steer.( We have run as much as .500".)
The stock control arm bushings have a lot of compliance or compression, and with that said, alignment settings are aggressive in measurement to compensate for the give in a 53 durometer reading on the control arm bushings. With this soft of a bushing, you would be surprised as to how much the toe settings change during torque loading... (turning, stopping and power down)
Food for thought,
Vansteel
Listen to this guy, not the guys in post # 2 and 3. The one thing you need to take away from Van Steel's post is: DO NOT RUN TOE OUT IN THE REAR!!!! Toe out in the rear is a recipe for disaster, especially at high speed events. Toe in allows the rear tires to have the correct slip angles to generate corning power and keep the rear end tucked in. Toe out requires the rear end to rotate (oversteer) to develop the required slip angle meaning you'll spend the day chasing your rear around the course. And at high speeds, it gets very difficult to catch your azz as things are happening much faster.
Listen to this guy, not the guys in post # 2 and 3. The one thing you need to take away from Van Steel's post is: DO NOT RUN TOE OUT IN THE REAR!!!! Toe out in the rear is a recipe for disaster, especially at high speed events. Toe in allows the rear tires to have the correct slip angles to generate corning power and keep the rear end tucked in. Toe out requires the rear end to rotate (oversteer) to develop the required slip angle meaning you'll spend the day chasing your rear around the course. And at high speeds, it gets very difficult to catch your azz as things are happening much faster.
The included link is to an often cited page of specs -- but not my information. Another site, while dated, is http://www.vbandp.com/instructions/h...ruct/align.htm
I experienced exactly what you say can happen when a botched alignment left me with -0.08in of toe-out in the rear. It was scary when accelerating with the ***-end stepping out on its own. I currently run 0.02in on the street with standard EMTs but crank in additional toe-in with 710s for autox.
--Dan
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The included link is to an often cited page of specs -- but not my information. Another site, while dated, is http://www.vbandp.com/instructions/h...ruct/align.htm
I experienced exactly what you say can happen when a botched alignment left me with -0.08in of toe-out in the rear. It was scary when accelerating with the ***-end stepping out on its own. I currently run 0.02in on the street with standard EMTs but crank in additional toe-in with 710s for autox.
--Dan
I should have said not to follow the specs in your first post, I just thought it was important for the OP to know not to use rear toe-out for the reasons you experienced above...whip spins can be a nasty thing! It's all good.
I'm assuming the "new" alignment systems you're talking about are the "computerized" alignments. That is the biggest joke to the automotive consumer (excluding the 3000 mile oil changes in our modern era cars). These new alignment machines are the same as before...they make the same mechanical measurements. But instead of the technician reading directly off the machine, we now have electrical devices that "read" the measurement. Then that "analog" data gets converted into "digital" data where it's sent to the computer's input device, processed, then sent to an output device that sends it to the printer where you now get your "computerized" wheel alignment. Every place that signal was processed added error. And you're assuming the calibration of the electrical sensor to the mechanical readings is correct.
I can do an alignment in my driveway that'll beat the hell out of a "computerized" alignment for accuracy. This is probably what the engineer at the plant was saying when talking about the "old method".















