When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I don't think I've seen this many threads on one forum about "dyno numbers" since I logged on the supra forum.
Go run your car, and let us know what it runs. Dyno numbers are for garage queens. The only number you should be concerned about when dyno'ing is the A/F.
Not to start a pissing match, but that comment really is silly. The only way to OBJECTIVELY analyze the impacts of the various engine modifications that can be made, one must use the most consistant tool available. Contrary to popular belief, it is neither the 1/4 mile timeslip, nor the SOTP method.
Horsepower does not necessarily correlate to to a faster time at the dragstrip because of the multitude of variables associated with a given race on a given night at a given track with a given driver.
SOTP method is a completely subjective measurement which can be impacted by the emotional state of the driver.
The Dyno takes most of the variables out of the mix and allows one to compare "apples to apples," particularly if the comparisons are done on the same dyno. Even though the dyno cannot "perfectly" match real world conditions, used correctly, it is the best tool available to objectively measure horsepower and the impact of a specific modification on a specific engine.
Not to start a pissing match, but that comment really is silly. The only way to OBJECTIVELY analyze the impacts of the various engine modifications that can be made, one must use the most consistant tool available. Contrary to popular belief, it is neither the 1/4 mile timeslip, nor the SOTP method.
Horsepower does not necessarily correlate to to a faster time at the dragstrip because of the multitude of variables associated with a given race on a given night at a given track with a given driver.
SOTP method is a completely subjective measurement which can be impacted by the emotional state of the driver.
The Dyno takes most of the variables out of the mix and allows one to compare "apples to apples," particularly if the comparisons are done on the same dyno. Even though the dyno cannot "perfectly" match real world conditions, used correctly, it is the best tool available to objectively measure horsepower and the impact of a specific modification on a specific engine.
But the point is that all SOME people on here seem to care about is the peak numbers. If you are objectively analyzing your dyno charts, that's another argument. But to be upset because your peak is down 5hp over another guy, who freakin cares. You can't compare dyno's, every single one is different.
Like you said, for one person seeking to see what each mod does, fine, for me, it's not about HP numbers, but driveability and ET. I could care less how much hp my car makes. AFR isn't going to give you a discount if your car makes 6 less HP than they advertise. Now if you are getting on the dyno and steady tuning and pulling out HP, that's where the dyno is useful, but as a bragging right, who cares. HP doesn't ALWAYS win races.
Last edited by Waveblaster785; Mar 12, 2007 at 11:25 PM.
No, didn't miss them at all, that's why I didn't mention them in the list of items that I felt don't really show on the dyno.
I did also agree that I thought his numbers were low regardless.
Where did you even get the impression that I missed that he had headers?
But the point is that all SOME people on here seem to care about is the peak numbers. If you are objectively analyzing your dyno charts, that's another argument. But to be upset because your peak is down 5hp over another guy, who freakin cares. You can't compare dyno's, every single one is different.
Like you said, for one person seeking to see what each mod does, fine, for me, it's not about HP numbers, but driveability and ET. I could care less how much hp my car makes. AFR isn't going to give you a discount if your car makes 6 less HP than they advertise. Now if you are getting on the dyno and steady tuning and pulling out HP, that's where the dyno is useful, but as a bragging right, who cares. HP doesn't ALWAYS win races.
I don't think anyone on here is dyno racing nor do most of us spend money on dyno's just to brag. The OP was asking if his numbers are low and they are compared to what other people have posted here. In fact unless that is a Mustang dyno they are about 30hp under what they should be. Maybe if he was dyno'd at 5000ft or it was really hot we could understand it. But considering what he has told us there is a lot of HP not being tapped. We may post peak numbers but I don't know about anyone else but my numbers are up all across the board and my times are are also down because of it.
But the point is that all SOME people on here seem to care about is the peak numbers. If you are objectively analyzing your dyno charts, that's another argument. But to be upset because your peak is down 5hp over another guy, who freakin cares. You can't compare dyno's, every single one is different.
Like you said, for one person seeking to see what each mod does, fine, for me, it's not about HP numbers, but driveability and ET. I could care less how much hp my car makes. AFR isn't going to give you a discount if your car makes 6 less HP than they advertise. Now if you are getting on the dyno and steady tuning and pulling out HP, that's where the dyno is useful, but as a bragging right, who cares. HP doesn't ALWAYS win races.
100%
If dyno graph results/numbers were truly that critical (and accurate) then the bolt on car that dynos 385rwhp would beat the one that dynos 370rwhp (both cars being of the same transmission, tires and driver) EVERY time but that of course isn't the case. Dyno numbers can be manipulated by playing with A/F mixtures and timing and can cause a vehicle to suddenly read up to 20+ (unsafe) horsepower higher.
As stated earlier, the better tune is not necessarily the one that simply dynos higher.
If dyno graph results/numbers were truly that critical (and accurate) then the bolt on car that dynos 385rwhp would beat the one that dynos 370rwhp (both cars being of the same transmission, tires and driver) EVERY time but that of course isn't the case. Dyno numbers can be manipulated by playing with A/F mixtures and timing and can cause a vehicle to suddenly read up to 20+ (unsafe) horsepower higher.
As stated earlier, the better tune is not necessarily the one that simply dynos higher.
If you have honest tuners the 385rwhp will beat the 370rwhp every time. They won't just tune for peak. Maybe I was just lucky getting Doug at LAPD to do my tune. He worked the entire rpm range getting the most across the spectrum.
If you have honest tuners the 385rwhp will beat the 370rwhp every time.
That's a big if LOL.
Not just honest but skilled/knowledgable as well...I do agree that if both cars are tuned properly the higher horsepower one should obviously win.
That's a big if LOL.
Not just honest but skilled/knowledgable as well...I do agree that if both cars are tuned properly the higher horsepower one should obviously win.
Wouldn't a more consistant pull be better than a hp spike, though.....I'd rather have a nice gain on the whole rpm range than a power spike thats 40 HP more than the previous and following rpms. Mine car's graph is like a gradual climbing mountian instead of a peak somewhere out in the desert kinda graph. It pulls like a mother LS1Lt1, you know what i'm talking about.....still amazed by your stock 1/4 numbers I think either the install did something screwy to this guy's car or the tuner is leaving a ton on the table.
QUOTE=mlongo99;1559335463]You have no baseline run to make any comparison. All this shows is the difference that the tune made, you have no data about your car when it was stock. Now every car is different, but the all are close to 400hp. Do you really think that your car is only making 8hp more than when it was totally stock? If is was, you wouldn't even feel a difference. For all you know, the dyno could be way out of calibration. Did you see any other C6s run on that dyno that day?[/QUOTE]
They didnt even have baselines from any other C6s to show you on that dyno?.. tells me that they dont really have experience with this car. My previous car had been down on power before at a shop... they showed me 20 other cars they had tuned.. despite their great rep. they couldnt tell me what was wrong with the car. Another car found the problem (slipped timing chain) and I gained 100whp over the baseline that I re dynoed there in 1 day.
This is why I love dyno days! Really good for bench marking to make sure your tuner is doing a good enough job. It wouldnt suprise me if they just put a simple flash on your car and really didnt tune the thing from scratch.
QUOTE=mlongo99;1559335463] Did you see any other C6s run on that dyno that day?
The only comparable dynos were from GTO's. Looks like he's never dynoed an LS2 Corvette.
I spoke with another reputable tuner in Durham, NC. He's done over 1,200 LS2's and he did say that my numbers were about 35-40HP too low. Looks like I'll be visiting him in a few weeks.
The only comparable dynos were from GTO's. Looks like he's never dynoed an LS2 Corvette.
I spoke with another reputable tuner in Durham, NC. He's done over 1,200 LS2's and he did say that my numbers were about 35-40HP too low. Looks like I'll be visiting him in a few weeks.
If this guy had c6 experience, he wouldnt let your car leave until it was making that power it was supposed to be.. we still dont know if the dyno is just configured low or what.. but you were the test subject.
No, didn't miss them at all, that's why I didn't mention them in the list of items that I felt don't really show on the dyno.
I did also agree that I thought his numbers were low regardless.
Where did you even get the impression that I missed that he had headers?
I read your post and you said, "That is a little low...". This is a 6MN with headers (if the other equipment does nothing on the dyno) that started with a baseline of 342 hp including the headers. Then, after tuning, it showed 355 hp.
If as you say, that's a little low, please tell me what do you think it should be?
I just had my 07 C6 Z51 mn 6 dyno tuned this weekend. Rick at Synergy installed a Hurricane air intake I brought him and my Torque=381.5 and HP=380.4. Everything else is completely stock. He tuned for wide band of torque. I am very pleased with these results.
If this guy had c6 experience, he wouldnt let your car leave until it was making that power it was supposed to be.. we still dont know if the dyno is just configured low or what.. but you were the test subject.
The guy he's going to in a couple of weeks is one of the best on the east coast and has done tons of LS2 GTOs, Vettes,etc.. I wish him luck and can't wait to hear what improvements are made over the previous tune.
I just had my 07 C6 Z51 mn 6 dyno tuned this weekend. Rick at Synergy installed a Hurricane air intake I brought him and my Torque=381.5 and HP=380.4. Everything else is completely stock. He tuned for wide band of torque. I am very pleased with these results.
I saw the dyno vid of your car, and sounds like he has done some nice work
Originally Posted by Evilways
The guy he's going to in a couple of weeks is one of the best on the east coast and has done tons of LS2 GTOs, Vettes,etc.. I wish him luck and can't wait to hear what improvements are made over the previous tune.
I just had my 07 C6 Z51 mn 6 dyno tuned this weekend. Rick at Synergy installed a Hurricane air intake I brought him and my Torque=381.5 and HP=380.4. Everything else is completely stock. He tuned for wide band of torque. I am very pleased with these results.
Was those numbers corrected? The results appear extremely high without headers.