Let's talk headers...
Thanks in advance...
Dinger
Thanks in advance...
Dinger
Thanks in advance...
Dinger
I'm no expert but have been reading this Forum for over 2 years,I bought and installed my Dynatech Headers after reading threads here. IMHO there isn't a whole lot of HP difference between the manufacturers, they are all within a few HP of each other. Don't pay a lot of attention to the maufacturers or the retailers Dyno charts, look at the Dynojet SAE corrected figures from members with the same mods.
S.S. is more expensive but lasts much longer than mild steel, looks better too.
Coated looks good but causes problems when you have to disassemble.
High Flo cats don't cost much in HP and could save you on an inspection.
As long as you are dropping the exhaust for headers, do an X pipe too.
Do an aftermarket over axle/muffler swap to take full advantage of the headers.
Kooks you could say is a Drag Header and Lgs are a Road Course Header for whipping you out of the corners. Thats what i got from doing alot of research. And dont forget about AMR headers they are similar to the Kooks with an new approach. Good luck to you because they are all Great Headers,and you will get gains from all of them,just in different areas. Some live in the lower rpms and some live in the higher rpms.
Kooks you could say is a Drag Header and Lgs are a Road Course Header for whipping you out of the corners. Thats what i got from doing alot of research. And dont forget about AMR headers they are similar to the Kooks with an new approach. Good luck to you because they are all Great Headers,and you will get gains from all of them,just in different areas. Some live in the lower rpms and some live in the higher rpms.

Thanks for your help, all.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Thanks for your help, all.

Either way you won't go wrong with a set of Kooks, LGs, or AR headers.
I would stick with a stainless steel header.
Do a search, this topic has been gone over quite a bit. There should be tons of info out there. I think recently someone posted a back to back comparison between Kooks(new style) headers and AR headers.
Max
Thanks for your help, all.

Good Luck,




Good luck,
LG designed their C6 headers for the road course, max torque coming out of a turn at lower RPM`s very long primaries which can hurt high rpm hp slightly. AR`s and Kooks designed there`s for max peak hp and have shorter primaries than LG`s slightly hurting mid rpm torque. But in saying that all 3 seem to put down very comparable numbers. The LG`s generaly a few more torque, and the AR`s and Kooks a few more hp. Usually no more than 5 either way on a bolt on car. So in reality all 3 are practicly the same on a bolt on car. I`m sure at higher hp levels the differences in the headers would manifest themselves as a larger torue and hp difference.
I own AR headers because I`m not a road course guy. I would also choose Kooks but I got a great deal on AR`s...
If I was going to road course the car I would go w/ the LG`s.Max at CARTEK just posted about that a couple of posts above mine...
I own AR headers because I`m not a road course guy. I would also choose Kooks but I got a great deal on AR`s...
If I was going to road course the car I would go w/ the LG`s.Max at CARTEK just posted about that a couple of posts above mine...
When I was drag racing my C5 KOOKS were on it. I have since given up drag racing and have interest in autocrossing and road racing (read HPDEs) hence LGs are on my C6.
That having been said, the LGs are said to make more "power under the curve". Said to be a desirable attribute in either road are drag racing.
The KOOKS are on some of the quickest quarter mile C5 and C6 Vettes out there though and there is no arguing with that.
However the power of the LGs can definitely be felt during "normal" driving as opposed to the higher RPM benefits I saw with the KOOKS on my C5.
Driving my C5 around town with the KOOKS, I really didn't feel much. However putting it on the drag strip, well the proof that there were "all that", was in the time slips. They definitely improved my top end, and not by just a little bit either.
The LGs on the other hand, in my C6, even during normal 1,2,3 gear driving, you can definitely feel the increase in torque.
But I agree with you. I wouldn't suspect that LGs would be as effective as KOOKS on the dragstrip, and I also wouldn't think that KOOKS would be as effective as LGs on the road course or driving around town in the lower RPM ranges. The LGs you can feel every time you drive the car. The KOOKS I saw the most benefit at the drag strip.
Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; Mar 24, 2007 at 02:10 PM.
When I was drag racing my C5 KOOKS were on it. I have since given up drag racing and have interest in autocrossing and road racing (read HPDEs) hence LGs are on my C6.
That having been said, the LGs are said to make more "power under the curve". Said to be a desirable attribute in either road are drag racing.
The KOOKS are on some of the quickest quarter mile C5 and C6 Vettes out there though and there is no arguing with that.
However the power of the LGs can definitely be felt during "normal" driving as opposed to the higher RPM benefits I saw with the KOOKS on my C5.
Driving my C5 around town with the KOOKS, I really didn't feel much. However putting it on the drag strip, well the proof that there were "all that", was in the time slips. They definitely improved my top end, and not by just a little bit either.
The LGs on the other hand, in my C6, even during normal 1,2,3 gear driving, you can definitely feel the increase in torque.
But I agree with you. I wouldn't suspect that LGs would be as effective as KOOKS on the dragstrip, and I also wouldn't think that KOOKS would be as effective as LGs on the road course or driving around town in the lower RPM ranges. The LGs you can feel every time you drive the car. The KOOKS I saw the most benefit at the drag strip.
We even both bought z51`s...

















