C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Factory Alignment Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2007, 03:31 PM
  #1  
Driver_WT
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Driver_WT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,037
Received 124 Likes on 81 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default Factory Alignment Specs

Anyone have the factory alignment specs for a 2005 C6.

Thanks.
Old 04-17-2007, 03:50 PM
  #2  
Buffy
Drifting
 
Buffy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

factory specs
front
camber -0.45 +/- 0.60 (+0.15 .. -1.05)
caster 7.90 +/- 0.60 ( 7.30 .. 8.50)
toe in 0.20 +/- 0.20 total ( 0.00 .. 0.40)
rear
camber -0.45 +/- 0.50 (-0.05 .. -0.95)
toe in 0.00 +/- 0.20 total (-0.20 .. +0.20)

But more camber is good.
Old 04-17-2007, 03:54 PM
  #3  
johnodrake
Moderator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
johnodrake's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Lakewood Ranch, FL
Posts: 40,065
Received 3,578 Likes on 1,619 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Driver_WT
Anyone have the factory alignment specs for a 2005 C6.

Thanks.

Here are specs for a 2006 - including mine.
Attached Files
File Type: xls
Alignment specs.xls (18.5 KB, 408 views)
Old 04-17-2007, 04:20 PM
  #4  
davekp78
Melting Slicks
 
davekp78's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: merritt island fl
Posts: 2,670
Received 131 Likes on 109 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (stock) 2019
2016 C1 of the Year Finalist
2015 C2 of the Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by Buffy
factory specs
front
camber -0.45 +/- 0.60 (+0.15 .. -1.05)
caster 7.90 +/- 0.60 ( 7.30 .. 8.50)
toe in 0.20 +/- 0.20 total ( 0.00 .. 0.40)
rear
camber -0.45 +/- 0.50 (-0.05 .. -0.95)
toe in 0.00 +/- 0.20 total (-0.20 .. +0.20)

But more camber is good.
Do you nean more camber in the positive direction, or negative direction?
More (negative) camber is not good if you are looking for longer tire life. More positive camber will reduce roadholding capability.
Old 04-17-2007, 04:30 PM
  #5  
Buffy
Drifting
 
Buffy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dave pawlowski
Do you nean more camber in the positive direction, or negative direction?
More (negative) camber is not good if you are looking for longer tire life. More positive camber will reduce roadholding capability.
More negative camber. At least in my experience, that improved both handling and tire life.

I measured tread depth at 1500 mile intervals and found that the tires were wearing more at the outside with 0.4 - 0.6 degrees negative camber. I ended up with about 1.2 degrees front and 0.8 degrees rear, could probably have used a little more.

Of course some of this is going to depend on your driving style, tires, etc. I've replaced the original GY tires with PS2s, they don't seem to need as much negative camber. So far, at least. I should be doing my 3K mile check soon and may adjust after that.

P.S. The numbers in the "moderate" column of that spreadsheet are very close to what I ended up with as optimal numbers.

Last edited by Buffy; 04-17-2007 at 04:35 PM.
Old 04-17-2007, 06:48 PM
  #6  
Driver_WT
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Driver_WT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,037
Received 124 Likes on 81 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

My left and right front tires are both wearing on the inside. I was thinking might be a little too much negative camber, but we will see.
Old 04-18-2007, 11:40 AM
  #7  
Vetteinplano
Burning Brakes
 
Vetteinplano's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Like this?

Old 04-18-2007, 12:45 PM
  #8  
BAMAGOLFER
Melting Slicks
 
BAMAGOLFER's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Al.
Posts: 2,601
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by Vetteinplano
Like this?



Old 04-18-2007, 01:32 PM
  #9  
natejohn
Burning Brakes
 
natejohn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Salinas Ca
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vetteinplano
Like this?

Yikes! ...I just replaced all my tires after I was told by the dealer my fronts were showing "cord"! I couldn't believe it but after he took me out to the lift...there it was, not as bad as the above but very close. Tires had about 24K on them and one Auto-X, Rears were down to the "wear bars" but showed even wear across the tires.

Rears are easy to keep track of but the inside of the frt tires are hard to see and since the outer was looking good.....sigh.

Haven't taken it in for an alignment as I can't make up my mind going with stock or "Auto-X/sprited street )
Old 04-18-2007, 01:36 PM
  #10  
IC6
Racer
 
IC6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Dartmouth Massachusetts
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

wow ... looks like the outside of that tire wasn't even touching the pavement...
Old 04-18-2007, 02:31 PM
  #11  
Buffy
Drifting
 
Buffy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Now that's just not right. Too much negative camber can increase wear on the inside, but I don't think you can get enough to account for that kind of wear.

Either those tires were toed in so far they were looking at each other or something else is badly wrong.

Get notified of new replies

To Factory Alignment Specs




Quick Reply: Factory Alignment Specs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 PM.