Pulstar Spark Plugs
20,000 times more powerful than ordinary plugs spark.
1 million watts of peak power versus 50 watts.
Has anyone tried them yet.
There is a power and mileage increase claim.
I can make a case for the Pulstar plug making less power. They say their spark lasts 2 billionths of a second while in conventional plugs the spark lasts 30 milllionths of a second. That means there is a shorter amount of time the A/F mixture is exposed to a means of igniting, so if the swirling mixture isn't exactly the right ratio at the point of the Pulstar when it gets its' short burst, a misfire will result causing a reduction in power and with the new OBD II system, it'll throw an "engine misfire" code. The longer duration of the conventional plug means a longer opportunity to ignite a marginal mixture. This is like an engine that makes high peak power but only in a very narrow, very high RPM range vs an engine that has less peak power but it's average power over the RPM band used during acceleration (usuable power band) is much greater. The engine with less peak power will kick the high peak power engine's butt all the way down the quarter mile.
Just another company preying on the ignorance of the general public in these times of high gas prices. Put it in the same category as the "Tornado" device et al that claim gains in HP and MPG with a simple device that's cheap enough for people to say "what the hell, it's not much money if it doesn't work", but they make a killing because it cost them pennies on the dollar to produce. Whenever you see one of these simple "devices", ask yourself in these times of high gas prices, EPA demands for higher MPG, and the consumers clamouring for high MPG cars, why don't we see any single car manufacturer putting these gas saving/power making devices on their cars from the facory so they can be the first with a car getting 100 MPG???
But there will always be ignorant people or those looking to get something for nothing that'll buy these things...much like what's going on in the world of hybrid cars where people think they are saving money when in fact they are much more expensive. I laugh at Prius owners when I ask them if they realize they'll have to drive the car for 20 years/800,000 miles just to get to break even on the extra money they spent for their "money saving" purchase. The look on their face is priceless when I show them the math...even better when I tell them the car will never last that long.
I tell them about the great MPG of the 'Vettes and they slap their head and say "I could've had a V8!"
Last edited by glass slipper; Jun 10, 2007 at 01:18 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





Sometimes you simply cannot reinvent the wheel, even if it involves a super conductive, flux capacitor driven, defribulating pinpoint laser spark.
The ONLY spark plugs I would ever use in a naturally aspirated LSx motor (other than the AC Delcos that it has in it until I remove them) is the NGK TR55...not platinums, not Iridiums, just plain old $2.25 TR55s.
Sometimes you simply cannot reinvent the wheel, even if it involves a super conductive, flux capacitor driven, defribulating pinpoint laser spark.
The ONLY spark plugs I would ever use in a naturally aspirated LSx motor (other than the AC Delcos that it has in it until I remove them) is the NGK TR55...not platinums, not Iridiums, just plain old $2.25 TR55s.
... I think. Maybe they are 55s. Too many cars.







One of my first hand experiences was to pay them $1.1 M over the course of 2 years to monitor the development of a new surface to air missile system for the Navy. The "Statement of Work" between the Navy & Sandia contained 28 items they were to perform. At the end of the 2 years 3 had been done. I know it’s an isolated case, and I know it was over 10 years ago, but I am skeptical of any work coming from Sandia.











