C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TrickFlow Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 07:13 PM
  #1  
cfi_luz's Avatar
cfi_luz
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default TrickFlow Heads

I just decided to add a set of TrickFlow 225 heads to my setup (g5x3 cam, LGM headers, underdrive pulley, vararam) and was wondering if anyone else has used this setup. I had TEA work the heads and we ended up going with 62cc chambers which should put me a hair over 11.4:1 CR using the GM MLS gaskets. I'm pretty excited and expecting some decent numbers but would like to hear from others who have used these heads. THanks
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 07:27 PM
  #2  
Joe_G's Avatar
Joe_G
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,949
Likes: 263
From: St. Louis, MO
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

I'll be very interested to see responses also. Why did you choose these?
Do you have to notch your pistons?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #3  
cfi_luz's Avatar
cfi_luz
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

I had hoped you might post here ... actually I choose these heads because several people on ls1tech and the guys at TEA recommended these over AFR due to them putting out higher numbers. Supposedly they don't give anything up down low but have higher peak numbers due to slightly larger intake ports and the fact that they use 13.5 degree valve angle instead of the traditional ls1 15 degree. Also, they have much more valve drop due to this fact so even when milled .015 to achieve the desired CR, I will still end up with more PV clearance than stock heads. So no, definitely do not have to notch pistons. There were two cars using these heads and similar sized cams to the g5x3 that put down 500+rwhp. Obviously these were all out bolt on cars, but I'm hoping for 470 or so??
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:10 PM
  #4  
SpinMonster's Avatar
SpinMonster
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,094
Likes: 197
From: Colorado Springs, CO
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11
Default

Originally Posted by Joe_G
I'll be very interested to see responses also. Why did you choose these?
Do you have to notch your pistons?
Both trick flow and ETP increase P/V clearance with a given cam. ETP is even more since hey are an 11 degree head. Trick flow will fit with a 236xer even milled. His cam is a 232 and will have zero issues unless its installed a tooth off at 17 degrees worth of nightmare.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:18 PM
  #5  
cfi_luz's Avatar
cfi_luz
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Thanks for the info Spin... it seems these heads haven't been used a whole lot but I just found a great article about them in a GMHP magazine, in that article with a 232 or so sized cam they outperformed any other head so I'd be interested to see where I wind up. Either way AFR, ETP and TFS heads were all right in the same price range and I think they are all going to perform very closely. I just wanted to try something a little different.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #6  
Batman7's Avatar
Batman7
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
From: Shorewood IL
Default

I have a very similiar package.

I have the TF LS2 heads with a slightly milder cam than the G5X3, UD pulley, Kooks 1 7/8 with catted x-pipe, ported and polished stock intake and TB. I also went with the Harland Sharp RR arms as recommended by TF.

I did not have my heads massaged at all.

I made 460 RWHP and 390 TQ on a Mustang dyno.

You should have no problem getting to 470 RWHP. I figure on a dynojet I would be pretty close to 500 RWHP. Although the dyno numbers do not really matter except to measure the gains and for tuning. The real benefit of these heads are their efficiency and the fact that my car runs like a raped ape now. I would like to see these heads with the GT11 cam from Lingenfelter, in fact I have been considering doing this over the winter for a little more driveability.

The only reason I did not go with a larger cam is that this is my DD so driveability and fuel mileage was a concern for me.

Overall, I am very pleased with the package.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 11:38 PM
  #7  
VetteNo2's Avatar
VetteNo2
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Louisville Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by Batman7
I have a very similiar package.

I have the TF LS2 heads with a slightly milder cam than the G5X3, UD pulley, Kooks 1 7/8 with catted x-pipe, ported and polished stock intake and TB. I also went with the Harland Sharp RR arms as recommended by TF.

I made 460 RWHP and 390 TQ on a Mustang dyno.

Overall, I am very pleased with the package.
I saw a car that looked like yours and was described as, "having TF heads and 460 RWHP on a mustang dyno," in New Lenox on Friday. Was it yours? Either way, it was a splendid looking Corvette!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 12:15 AM
  #8  
Brasil's Avatar
Brasil
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 904
Likes: 1
Default

A FAST intake will REALLY help with those heads and cam. The LS2 manifold will be your bottle neck. ALso, wouldn;t the 215's be better suited for the street, and offer better low end torque?
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 12:32 AM
  #9  
cfi_luz's Avatar
cfi_luz
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

I was told the 225's were designed for the ls2 with the 4.0" bore, the 215's were better suited to ls1/6 motors with smaller bores. This was what was recommended by both TEA and Vengance Motorsports, both of which put out some very stout combo's so I feel confident in their advice. I had actually wanted to go 215's for more torque but was assured the difference would be minimal (plus the cost on each head was very similar but 225's have better springs).
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 01:16 AM
  #10  
Batman7's Avatar
Batman7
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
From: Shorewood IL
Default

Originally Posted by VetteNo2
I saw a car that looked like yours and was described as, "having TF heads and 460 RWHP on a mustang dyno," in New Lenox on Friday. Was it yours? Either way, it was a splendid looking Corvette!
Yes, it was mine and thanks for the compliment. Once I get my DPE wheels back on it will look even better. They were dynoing it again b/c I had a header manifold leak and we think it caused the O2 sensor to go bad. So they were just making sure everything was copacetic.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 01:18 AM
  #11  
Batman7's Avatar
Batman7
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
From: Shorewood IL
Default

Originally Posted by Brasil
A FAST intake will REALLY help with those heads and cam. The LS2 manifold will be your bottle neck. ALso, wouldn;t the 215's be better suited for the street, and offer better low end torque?
True. I know I left some HP and TQ on the table but I did want to cut into the firewall and I did not feel that the one LG sells that you supposedly do not have to modify one was not worth the extra coin to me.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 01:38 AM
  #12  
Batman7's Avatar
Batman7
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
From: Shorewood IL
Default

Originally Posted by cfi_luz
I was told the 225's were designed for the ls2 with the 4.0" bore, the 215's were better suited to ls1/6 motors with smaller bores. This was what was recommended by both TEA and Vengance Motorsports, both of which put out some very stout combo's so I feel confident in their advice. I had actually wanted to go 215's for more torque but was assured the difference would be minimal (plus the cost on each head was very similar but 225's have better springs).
I was told the same thing. I also found, as I am sure you have as well, is that these motors rev so quick and get in the powerband of the cam so soon that you do not even miss or notice what minimal loss in torque there may be.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 05:53 AM
  #13  
Joe_G's Avatar
Joe_G
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,949
Likes: 263
From: St. Louis, MO
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by cfi_luz
I had hoped you might post here ... actually I choose these heads because several people on ls1tech and the guys at TEA recommended these over AFR due to them putting out higher numbers. Supposedly they don't give anything up down low but have higher peak numbers due to slightly larger intake ports and the fact that they use 13.5 degree valve angle instead of the traditional ls1 15 degree. Also, they have much more valve drop due to this fact so even when milled .015 to achieve the desired CR, I will still end up with more PV clearance than stock heads. So no, definitely do not have to notch pistons. There were two cars using these heads and similar sized cams to the g5x3 that put down 500+rwhp. Obviously these were all out bolt on cars, but I'm hoping for 470 or so??
Sounds like a great combo!

My friend got 488/425 using AFR 225's and a similar cam so I think you will get 470 pretty easily.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1654018

He has a FAST - now that Spinmonster has shown us all how easy it is to mod the FAST for a C6, I'll be getting one myself one of these days.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1799958

Who's doing your install/tuning? Are there any other odd items you need to do to these heads or are they basically bolt on? Appreciate your input as I was figuring on going AFR someday and cutting my pistons but I'd prefer to not do so so this is a viable option.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 11:22 AM
  #14  
cfi_luz's Avatar
cfi_luz
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Here is the flow data for the heads, I believe they outflow the AFR's up top. You are correct though, that the biggest plus is the fact that you can mill the heads and still have sufficient PV clearance and thus not need to notch the pistons. I do all my own work on the car. I had initially used a mail order tune from LGM but I think after all the help you've given I'll be ordering HP Tuners and getting a baseline tune from Charlie at RPM. The heads are a direct bolt on and come with new proper length pushrods as well. The only additional item you need (I guess not needed but strongly suggested) is a set of Harland Sharp rockers. Actually, I thought it was a good idea anyway given the lift of my cam, etc. Here is a link to some info on the heads in case you were interested in checking out the specs: http://www.totalengineairflow.com/pr...gmhead/tfsls1/
Flow Data
TFS 225cc LS-2
Intake Exhaust
0.1 67 54
0.2 141 118
0.3 223 187
0.4 279 231
0.5 316 252
0.55 329 258
0.6 335 262
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #15  
DOUG @ ECS's Avatar
DOUG @ ECS
Premium Supporting Vendor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,599
Likes: 1,224
From: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Default

You will be very happy with the Trick Flow heads, we have made over 470 several times with a milder cam than what has been discussed here. Looking forward to your results.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #16  
Joe_G's Avatar
Joe_G
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,949
Likes: 263
From: St. Louis, MO
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Great - I'll look forward to your results, please be sure to post up!

When you go to the dyno try to get the ".drf" files on your thumb drive, you can export the information, and information from HP Tuners histograms, to really do some serious analysis of your car. I'll show you if you like.

Also, good call on the HP Tuners. If you are willing and able to wrench on your own car you will love HP Tuners I predict. It's a wonderful scanning and tuning program and their forum is an excellent source of help (along with the program itself). I'm happy to help too, but I'm a newbie to it so keep that in mind.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #17  
SpinMonster's Avatar
SpinMonster
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,094
Likes: 197
From: Colorado Springs, CO
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11
Default

Keep in mind that the trick flows wont work with stock rockers, so price in 400 more for Hsharp rockers.

AFR's and their 224 cam have been making in the 460-480 ball park forever depending on what else you bolt on. If you can keep the cam size down it will make for an easy time tuning since its your first go-around not to mention the part throttle driveability from the small 205 chamber.

Using a 238 cam ParticG from LS1tech got 508 to the wheels with a set of 205's on a 5.7 liter with gears. Dont bother with large runner heads for peak HP at the expense of low end TQ. Coupled with silly size cams in a stock displacement, the low end will be missing in action. Forget the afr 225's too.

One question you may wish to ask before buying any of the above is where are the 10 second cars with all these huge cams and big runner heads? Cartek's 243 heads have gone 10.8 with the 3x cam and the 2x cam made 470rwhp through 4.10 gears just last month. One does mod a car to make it faster right? I fail to see all the silly size runners and over sized cams are being used since all it does is make big dyno numbers and the cars feel like they have nothing under 4k rpms.

Stay with a small cam and a small intake runner for 460 with great low end TQ........afr205's and a 224 cam.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To TrickFlow Heads

Old Sep 5, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #18  
corvettetimmy's Avatar
corvettetimmy
Racer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: bluffton sc
Default

You will be totally satisfied with the trick flow heads.

Sure there are trick flow pimps out there, but there are way more AFR pimps than anything else. Look on LS1 tech and you will see that every trickflow car puts down big numbers. Personally, Im a Patriot Performance Parts pimp since they cost $1k and I have personally put a set on a c5 that made 535 rwhp with a 408 and 238/240 cam.. That was with the little patriot heads (2.02 valves) for a standard bore.

Anyway, they all make big power, it just depends on what brand you like.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 07:45 PM
  #19  
cfi_luz's Avatar
cfi_luz
Thread Starter
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

This car doesn't seem to be giving up much torque down low? Maybe we have different opinions on what good tq numbers are, but I'd be happy with this setup. Mods are:

TrickFlow TFS 225cc Cylinder Heads (64cc)
Vengeance Racing VRX5 (236/238)
Kooks Longtubes w catted connection pipes
FAST 90 Ported by Vengeance
Pulley
Corsa Catback
180* Stat
Vengeance Programming

Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #20  
Joe_G's Avatar
Joe_G
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,949
Likes: 263
From: St. Louis, MO
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

FYI, Patriot Perf. used to have great pricing on HS rockers, they still might. I got a set there cheap for my C5 and they have great customer service (Gunnar is the man there).
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 AM.

story-0
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-2
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE