When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Forest Hill, (Out in the country), north of Baltimore. Maryland. Land of "Pleasant Living" with my Corvette, steamed crabs & crab cakes.
Octane question?
I have a 08 auto 3LS Coupe, no other options. I run Sunoco 91 octane, would a higher octane make my Vette perform faster? The highest I have seen in Maryland locally is Exxon with 93 or 94 Octane.
Increasing octane slows combustion.
Unless your engine is tuned for higher octane and advances the timing to take advantage of it, there is absolutely no benefit to running higher octane.
Gas quality varies so much, you'd need a scanner to determine if your getting any spark knock. If your not getting any spark knock at all, then no 93 wouldn't make any more power than 91.
If you are getting any spark knock on 91, 93 will make more power.
Both have the same BTU's, just a matter of - is the motor knocking at all. If not, there is no power to be gained at a higher octane.
Vette motors are such high compression, most will show a little knock. I'd always use 93 if available. I've heard 91 rattle like marbles in a tin can. Very area specific though, I've also seen some areas where 91 runs perfect.
Increasing octane slows combustion.
Unless your engine is tuned for higher octane and advances the timing to take advantage of it, there is absolutely no benefit to running higher octane.
Not so. The ECU will pull timing if it senses knock from lower octane. I suspect it will also add fuel to kill the knock. So yes, 93 octane will yield slightly more power than 91. But I doubt you would notice the difference unless you are at the drag strip.
Not so. The ECU will pull timing if it senses knock from lower octane. I suspect it will also add fuel to kill the knock. So yes, 93 octane will yield slightly more power than 91. But I doubt you would notice the difference unless you are at the drag strip.
You are partially correct. IF there is knock the computer does retard timing. So increasing Octane to reduce detonation (combustion) would increase power as timing would not be retarded. The LS3 engine is designed to optimally run on 91 Octane and there is no suggestion of knock. Adding Octane in the absence of knock actually reduces power. Adding fuel does not kill knock.
You are partially correct. IF there is knock the computer does retard timing. So increasing Octane to reduce detonation (combustion) would increase power as timing would not be retarded. The LS3 engine is designed to optimally run on 91 Octane and there is no suggestion of knock. Adding Octane in the absence of knock actually reduces power. Adding fuel does not kill knock.
If the LS3 is tuned for 91 then you are right. However, it can be tuned for 93 octane. Also, you are wrong when you say that addind fuel does not kill knock. There are two ways to stop knock: reduce timing and/or decrease AF ratio.
You are partially correct. IF there is knock the computer does retard timing. So increasing Octane to reduce detonation (combustion) would increase power as timing would not be retarded. The LS3 engine is designed to optimally run on 91 Octane and there is no suggestion of knock. Adding Octane in the absence of knock actually reduces power. Adding fuel does not kill knock.
Your last two statements are incorrect as well as the one above about higher octane slowing combustion. Octane is a measure of the resistance of a fuel to self-ignite or detonate...it is not a measure of the BTU content or the flame speed of the fuel. "Going richer or leaner from stoichiometric correct mixture (Lambda=1 or 14.7:1) decreases the probability of knock. A rich mixture is especially effective in reducing or eliminating knock because of the longer ignition delay and the lower temperatures of compression." This is quoted from my Internal Combustion Engine text book from college where I minored in ICEs.
Your last two statements are incorrect as well as the one above about higher octane slowing combustion. Octane is a measure of the resistance of a fuel to self-ignite or detonate...it is not a measure of the BTU content or the flame speed of the fuel. "Going richer or leaner from stoichiometric correct mixture (Lambda=1 or 14.7:1) decreases the probability of knock. A rich mixture is especially effective in reducing or eliminating knock because of the longer ignition delay and the lower temperatures of compression." This is quoted from my Internal Combustion Engine text book from college where I minored in ICEs.