When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Has anyone adjusted their intake runner length to match a new cam, or just wanted to tweak the power curve for their particular application? The stock 06 Z06 length measures 13", 7.5 for runner and 5.5 in head. That's 5,788 RPM. OK, so it's also designed for street.
But I do HPDEs and with my cam it drops to 5,379 RPM. So hmmm take an inch off? What do you think? What's the length of the C5R's or C6R's? Bet that's hard to find out.
From: Austin, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Houston, Dallas, Hong Kong, Elgin, etc.. Texas
Originally Posted by kelp
Has anyone adjusted their intake runner length to match a new cam, or just wanted to tweak the power curve for their particular application? The stock 06 Z06 length measures 13", 7.5 for runner and 5.5 in head. That's 5,788 RPM. OK, so it's also designed for street.
But I do HPDEs and with my cam it drops to 5,379 RPM. So hmmm take an inch off? What do you think? What's the length of the C5R's or C6R's? Bet that's hard to find out.
I've been looking at the Harrop for a while. The uppper runers look shorter (wonder what it's tuned to), indiv TBs. But not fly by wire, though I could make a TPS and actuator motor fit, if I could spend 8 grand. What a wonderful idea! I think I'm relagated to the lowly position of Mr homebrew man.
Not hating here and as a discussion point only: since the power levels far exceed the ability to get traction on the street and track use will not better FI use, whats the point?
Current LS7 users have gotten 630rwhp with the current technology I dont really see what is to be gained. Solid roller 10k redline for N/A operation?
What I am asking here is to understand the application and how it improves upon the current available modes. Having runner length that allows peaks at other rpm's than the current 6300 rpm options does what?
Using such an intake on an LS2 isnt cheaper than getting a forged 427 from Lingenfelter for $6300. A TT kit installed is 10k and the runner change fro more rpm's will invlove massive valvetrain modifications.
Last edited by SpinMonster; Mar 2, 2008 at 06:56 PM.
From: Austin, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Houston, Dallas, Hong Kong, Elgin, etc.. Texas
Originally Posted by SpinMonster
Not hating here and as a discussion point only: since the power levels far exceed the ability to get traction on the street and track use will not better FI use, whats the point?
Current LS7 users have gotten 630rwhp with the current technology I dont really see what is to be gained. Solid roller 10k redline for N/A operation?
What I am asking here is to understand the application and how it improves upon the current available modes. Having runner length that allows peaks at other rpm's than the current 6300 rpm options does what?
Using such an intake on an LS2 isnt cheaper than getting a forged 427 from Lingenfelter for $6300. A TT kit installed is 10k and the runner change fro more rpm's will invlove massive valvetrain modifications.
You are correct. These intake systems don't make sense financially. There are a number of cheaper and less complicated alternatives to achieve the same goal.
Within the stock intake architecture, altering runner length is a waste of time. I've done it on the LS2 a while back. As the L76 is basically the same style I'll say its not worthwhile either. Now, if you are not bound by the stock dimensions, it could be very rewarding. But the cost is very prohibitive. Even the Hogans are big $$$$ and hogan look-a-likes are still $2500.
Better to find power as others have suggested. A little over $3k buys a 402 or bigger shortblock.
If there is a displacement guideline and you cant use forced induction, then that may be an applicaton. I'm just not sure why its considered unless there are people messing with it 'because its there'.
In general, as compared to stock, longer runners will increase torque and shorter will increase hp at higher rpm. It is a tipping point issue because an increase in one is is usually at the expense of the other.
The guys who try carbs or sheet metal intakes (NA) are painfully aware of the consequences of this trade off. On the dyno it is almost 1:1.
Heads and cam is a much more direct approach, and it fits under the hood.