Diablo Predator Programer vs. Dyno Tuning by changing computer program.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 7, 2008 | 10:34 PM

#41

huckleberrydude

Pro

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 639

Likes: 0

From: springfield missouri

I'm seeing no real difference on my FI application, but it hasn't hurt anything either. The fans are tuned to come on early and maybe it maintains cooler temps earlier...I can't tell. I can tell you that for three bucks at the local auto parts store, it can't hurt.

Apr 7, 2008 | 10:39 PM

#42

SANJU100

Thread Starter

Instructor

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts: 136

Likes: 0

From: OCEANSIDE CA

Would Anyone Recommend Me To Go For 160* Stat?

Apr 7, 2008 | 10:45 PM

#43

NIGHTSTALKER

Drifting

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 1,757

Likes: 2

From: Middletown DE

Quote:

Originally Posted by SANJU100

Would Anyone Recommend Me To Go For 160* Stat?

I'm running one but there has been much debate recently about the 160 not letting the engine run in the optimal heat range for engine longevity....So, I'm actually debating putting my stoker back in.

Apr 7, 2008 | 11:50 PM

#44

Leo z51

Instructor

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 123

Likes: 0

From: Maynard MA

Quote:

Originally Posted by SANJU100

Would Anyone Recommend Me To Go For 160* Stat?

I wouldnt run one. I'm pretty sure GM designed the engine to run the temps that it runs. Maybe if you are constantly tracking the car and it sees steady temps of 235+ all the time yeah, why not. But for a street car, I would think it would run worse with such a cold t-stat.

Reply Subscribe