When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Thanks to Louis at LG for all of his work!!! He is amazing!! I can't thank him enough for all of his work. First off he should make a new thread about my dyno or he may post on here and get into more detail.
First he swapped my G5x3 cam for a G6x3 and put the L92/L76 on my car with the other mods listed in my sig. Car made 462/423 through 4.10s.
Next he kept the G6x3 in my car and put a set of Trick Flow 225 heads milled to 62cc with YT rockers. Car made 490/442 through 4.10s. So if you add 10hp back in for the loss through the 4.10s that puts this setup at a little over 500rwhp.
So my final numbers with my final setup listed in my sig put me at 490/442 through 4.10s which should calculate to around 500/452.
Thanks again Louis and LG by letting me reach my goal of 500rwhp on my LS2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Le Mans Master<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/5k-6k.gif" border="0">
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,404
Likes: 1
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Originally Posted by dsp300c
Thanks to Louis at LG for all of his work!!! He is amazing!! I can't thank him enough for all of his work. First off he should make a new thread about my dyno or he may post on here and get into more detail.
First he swapped my G5x3 cam for a G6x3 and put the L92/L76 on my car with the other mods listed in my sig. Car made 462/423 through 4.10s.
Next he kept the G6x3 in my car and put a set of Trick Flow 225 heads milled to 62cc with YT rockers. Car made 490/442 through 4.10s. So if you add 10hp back in for the loss through the 4.10s that puts this setup at a little over 500rwhp.
So my final numbers with my final setup listed in my sig put me at 490/442 through 4.10s which should calculate to around 500/452.
Thanks again Louis and LG by letting me reach my goal of 500rwhp on my LS2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Andrew
Nice results!
Question: When you were running the G6x3 with the L92 heads, what milling had been done to the heads and what gasket was used? In other words, how much compression were you running? Did they have to flycut the pistons with that setup?
Ill post the graphs here in a little bit. The only variable that I had no control over was the Rockers. The Trick flows had a 1.75, and the L92s had a 1.7
Gaskets were .043 cometics, reused on both heads, compression was the same for both as well, 11.3:1, both heads were milled to 62cc.
The L92s could have made a tick more with a ported intake, but not a 30 hp deficit. This was definitely a good comparo.
Le Mans Master<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/5k-6k.gif" border="0">
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,404
Likes: 1
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Originally Posted by Louis @ LG Motorsports
Ill post the graphs here in a little bit. The only variable that I had no control over was the Rockers. The Trick flows had a 1.75, and the L92s had a 1.7
Gaskets were .043 cometics, reused on both heads, compression was the same for both as well, 11.3:1, both heads were milled to 62cc.
The L92s could have made a tick more with a ported intake, but not a 30 hp deficit. This was definitely a good comparo.
Thanks. I wonder what it would do with a FAST intake?
Thanks for sharing your results with us. It's nice to see an apples to apples comparison. Did you notice any difference in the driving manners between the L92s and the TF 225s?
How long does scanning a graph take? We have been waiting all day.
The FAST + g6x3+ TRICK FLOWS obviously produced a lethal combo.
Glad to see we can still keep up with the L92. Ill be awaiting the dyno
sheet for review