When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hey guys, I'm a newb when it comes to cam's...I'm thinking of having a cam package done to my LS7...the shop I'll probably go with has their own cam...the only specs I could find on their site are as follows:
DX7 - (LSx motors from 400 CID - 475 CID) - 23x/24x Duration at .640+/.630+ duration (1.7) 111 LSA (Not recommended for Blower Cars)
So, to all you cam guys...what would you consider this cam: "large/aggressive...mild...somewhere in between?"
I'm looking for a cam with no bucking or surging, mild to mod lope, and near stock driveability....also enjoy tq over high end hp...
Lingenfelter GT-11. Drives like stock, with good low, great mid,good top end. No surging or bucking at all. Will lope some at 550-600rpm, but if 650-up, smooth as stock. Have mine setup to be smooth in gear(650), lope in park/neutral(550)
I would consider this cam to be aggressive It is almost certainly too aggressive to meet your, "I'm looking for...," description. Something in the 224/228, 575/575, 114 +2 might be closer.
With your Z06, you can go a little bigger than the earlier suggestions, but the cam you're considering is probably too big if you don't want any driveability issues. I'd look for something in the high 220's low 230's with lift in the .610 range. 112LSA would give you the mean idle and good midrange pull.
With your Z06, you can go a little bigger than the earlier suggestions, but the cam you're considering is probably too big if you don't want any driveability issues. I'd look for something in the high 220's low 230's with lift in the .610 range. 112LSA would give you the mean idle and good midrange pull.
Yikes! I read LS7 as LS2. I agree with Old Motorhead. The cam you cited is still too much but the one I cited earlier may not be enough. I have a Crane Z Cam 228/232, 600/600, 112, +5 in my LS2 and it has very minor surging at 1650 with some decent lope at 975. It produces a lot of low-end with 6.0 liters. With 7.0 liters and this cam you'd be changing tires more frequently than oil and you should have near-stock drivability with a good tune. The extra liter would really take the edge off this cam's attitude. The next Z Cam up the scale is a 236/240. A good tuner might make this one meet your needs, though the tune would need to be really good. Comp has similar selections. You have a great problem! I must have 7.0 liter envy.
Yikes! I read LS7 as LS2. I agree with Old Motorhead. The cam you cited is still too much but the one I cited earlier may not be enough. I have a Crane Z Cam 228/232, 600/600, 112, +5 in my LS2 and it has very minor surging at 1650 with some decent lope at 975. It produces a lot of low-end with 6.0 liters. With 7.0 liters and this cam you'd be changing tires more frequently than oil and you should have near-stock drivability with a good tune. The extra liter would really take the edge off this cam's attitude. The next Z Cam up the scale is a 236/240. A good tuner might make this one meet your needs, though the tune would need to be really good. Comp has similar selections. You have a great problem! I must have 7.0 liter envy.
If I had 7L to work with, that cam would be real close to what I'd want. I had a 232/234/600 on a 112 in my 6.2L that was a little too much. I heard that a good tuner could rid me of the cam surge. I tried two of Houston's best with no luck. I'd rather go a little lite on the cam than go a little too much and put up with driveablility issues. Too much gets you 10 extra HP that you see only over 6000 rpm.
Looking at the dyno graphs being posted around the web, you'll notice that most keep a pretty wide split, especially if the stock exhaust manifolds remain on the car. Something like a 224/236 115 to 228/240 115 might be in the range you are looking for. Several sponsors here have posted some nice results. Good luck in your selection.
Looking at the dyno graphs being posted around the web, you'll notice that most keep a pretty wide split, especially if the stock exhaust manifolds remain on the car. Something like a 224/236 115 to 228/240 115 might be in the range you are looking for. Several sponsors here have posted some nice results. Good luck in your selection.
I agree. The op's proposed cam is gonna be pretty large and aggressive w/ atleast 13* overlap not to mention you're gonna need some serious springs as that cam was ground w/ a lot of lift for 1.7 rockers.
Don't LS7's have 1.8 ratio rocker arms? Lift on the intake side of the OP's proposed cam would be .678. That would take some serious springs as well as possibly flycutting the pistons. Duration on both sides would also go up slightly vs advertised with the higher ratio rockers.
The LS7 has a 1.8 rocker. So the cam must be ground for this. We run a 224-234 with .640 lift on a 112-114 lsa. It idles good with some lope, pulls like a freight train, doesn't give the big RWHP numbers. But what the hell, when was the last time you have seen two chassis dynos racing.
Hey guys thanks for all the replies...the specs on the cam in my o.p. is from a local shop here in Colorado...I just lifted those numbers straight from their website...I'm not sure what else they have, but I'm sure they could probably work with me...anyway, here are a few cams I'm considering from CF sponsors...I spend most of my time over in the C6 Z06 section, so that's where I got most of my info from on these cams...what do you guys think of these based on what I've stated I'm looking for in a cam?
The QM550 street bully...no specs on this one but plenty of info over in the C6 Z06 section
vette-air.com
The LS7 has a 1.8 rocker. So the cam must be ground for this. We run a 224-234 with .640 lift on a 112-114 lsa. It idles good with some lope, pulls like a freight train, doesn't give the big RWHP numbers. But what the hell, when was the last time you have seen two chassis dynos racing.
If I had 7L to work with, that cam would be real close to what I'd want. I had a 232/234/600 on a 112 in my 6.2L that was a little too much. I heard that a good tuner could rid me of the cam surge. I tried two of Houston's best with no luck. I'd rather go a little lite on the cam than go a little too much and put up with driveablility issues. Too much gets you 10 extra HP that you see only over 6000 rpm.
Hey guys thanks for all the replies...the specs on the cam in my o.p. is from a local shop here in Colorado...I just lifted those numbers straight from their website...I'm not sure what else they have, but I'm sure they could probably work with me...anyway, here are a few cams I'm considering from CF sponsors...I spend most of my time over in the C6 Z06 section, so that's where I got most of my info from on these cams...what do you guys think of these based on what I've stated I'm looking for in a cam?
The QM550 street bully...no specs on this one but plenty of info over in the C6 Z06 section
vette-air.com
OMG! That Katech cam has got some really outlandish specs. With +12 overlap, and such a tight LSA, it must idle at 1500 RPMs. JEEEEEEEEEEZ! And the LIFT! You must have to change valvesprings once a MONTH!
If I had 7L to work with, that cam would be real close to what I'd want. I had a 232/234/600 on a 112 in my 6.2L that was a little too much. I heard that a good tuner could rid me of the cam surge. I tried two of Houston's best with no luck. I'd rather go a little lite on the cam than go a little too much and put up with driveablility issues. Too much gets you 10 extra HP that you see only over 6000 rpm.
Rod, do you have a current dyno sheet of your new cam in your sig? How does it behave? Lope, surging, bucking?
Rod, do you have a current dyno sheet of your new cam in your sig? How does it behave? Lope, surging, bucking?
It dynoed 465/420 tq thru 4.10's if memory serves. HP peak is around 6300. It lopes pretty good. There's no mistaking it for a stock cam. The 232/234 cam had a meaner idle, more issues, more torque, and less top end. Peaked at 458 at 6000 rpm. Torque was about 445 though. Current cam has very little surging or bucking, but you can notice a little on occasion (1600 to 1800 rpm against a gusty wind will induce a little buck). I have a dyno sheet somewhere, but my filing system for this type stuff isn't that great. I haven't run across it lately. If I find it, I'll send you a PM.