Cam selection giving me a headache!!
i have read all the threads on cams and i am still no closer to making a selection. of course everyone agrees it depends on how you will use your car and what your goals are. having said that here is what i have and here is what i want.
i have a daily driver M6 with CAI, LT Headers, 3.90 Gears and a tune. currently at 425/420. i will never add a power adder and my only planned additions are an intake and under drive pulley. i want to keep it very reliable with great driveability. prefer a slighly more agressive lope that you can hear when npp exhaust is open but do not want car to shake. i want power EVERYWHERE as i am not interested in peak numbers. I would like to gain approx 40 hp and ft lbs accross the board so my goal is 465/460. i want to feel the power in 6th gear at 70mph / 2,500 rpm and i want to feel it in every gear at 6,600 rpm..
so what are my choices??
I am assuming you have an LS3 based on your existing numbers. If so, this means you can go with a little bit bigger cam, and still retain good driveability and street manners.
Since this is a daily driver, and not a weekend strip warrior, I would suggest you keep the lift under .600". This will keep valvetrain noise down, and valvetrain life up --- you won't be needing to swap out your valvesprings every 20K miles.
I would also recommend keeping the LSA at 114-115. This will do two things. One is that it will keep your TQ curve relatively flat, with good midrange. It will also keep your idle relatively tame. A narrower LSA (112 or so) combined with a relatively larger duration will result in more overlap, and resulting idle and driveability issues.
So, keeping in mind this is a daily driver, I would say a 228-232, .588", 114 grind would suit you very well. This is a fairly standard Comp Cams XE-R lobe, and there are tons of them around. I am reasonably sure that SpinMonster uses a cam with very similar specs.
This is a good starting point. Let the debate begin!
When I cam this car I want it to sound like the apocalypse is coming when it's loping.
My car is already fast enough for a street vehicle, so really I want a cam for the sound. I miss my firebirds lope
When I cam this car I want it to sound like the apocalypse is coming when it's loping.
My car is already fast enough for a street vehicle, so really I want a cam for the sound. I miss my firebirds lope

Last edited by Mike V.; May 8, 2009 at 12:20 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Last edited by PRE-Z06; May 8, 2009 at 03:25 AM.
I've had a G5-X2 in my C5Z for 2.5 years now. It's a 232/240 .595/.608 on a 114lsa. If I could do it all over again I'd have gotten something with a little more low end grunt, but at the time I hadn't gotten my dedicated track car yet and was running HPDEs w/ the car so the G5-X2 was perfect. Now that it's a driver/weekend toy something w/ more low end would be more fun tooling around.
I think these guys have you in the right direction... keep lift below .600, keep the LSA at 114 or higher and consider the XFI lobe profile which is a little easier on the valve-train.
You have to remember there's a reason these cars come with the stock cams like they do... GM tries to make the best of all worlds when it comes to longevity, emissions, and drivability... you have to sacrifice somewhere when you put a cam in.
I've had a G5-X2 in my C5Z for 2.5 years now. It's a 232/240 .595/.608 on a 114lsa. If I could do it all over again I'd have gotten something with a little more low end grunt, but at the time I hadn't gotten my dedicated track car yet and was running HPDEs w/ the car so the G5-X2 was perfect. Now that it's a driver/weekend toy something w/ more low end would be more fun tooling around.
I think these guys have you in the right direction... keep lift below .600, keep the LSA at 114 or higher and consider the XFI lobe profile which is a little easier on the valve-train.
You have to remember there's a reason these cars come with the stock cams like they do... GM tries to make the best of all worlds when it comes to longevity, emissions, and drivability... you have to sacrifice somewhere when you put a cam in.
The 228/232 is a nice grind, but even better for driveability would be a 228/228. You give up a little on the top end (less peak HP), but overall average TQ might even go up.
The 228/232 is a nice grind, but even better for driveability would be a 228/228. You give up a little on the top end (less peak HP), but overall average TQ might even go up.
Only way anyone listening to it could possibly tell was the idle speed was 50 RPMs higher. Most people cannot hear that.
IMHO, many cams can result in a mild lope, but not have any shake. To me, shake is when the idle roughness is externally visible.
Maybe we just have a diferent understanding of the terminology.
i just got off the phone with comp and they said based on what i am looking for this would be the way to go. their xfi cam 566/576 - 222/234 - lsa 113. these numbers mean nothing to me but this is what they said..
Only way anyone listening to it could possibly tell was the idle speed was 50 RPMs higher. Most people cannot hear that.
IMHO, many cams can result in a mild lope, but not have any shake. To me, shake is when the idle roughness is externally visible.
Maybe we just have a diferent understanding of the terminology.
You can do a cam with:
almost no detectable lope and no shake
detecable lope but no real shake
lope and shake.
Idle speed has a lot to do with it. At 800 rpm, a lot of DD cams idle like stock. Pull the idle speed back 50, - 75 rpm and you hear a little lope but it still remains smooth. Dial back to 675 - 700 rpm and some shake starts to occur. Obviously, these rpms are example and vary by cam.
















