When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
'05 C6 non Z51 w/G6X3 cam, LS6 ported heads, Lingenfelter ported LS2 Intake, ported TB, Vararam CAI, LG PRO LTs and Xpipe, B&B catback, tune. The car made 460rwhp 408rwtq and has ran 11.7 @ 125.7mph on the stock clutch. Adding a LS7 clutch/flywheel, FAST 92 and 4.10s, what do you think it should run?? and how much power would it pick up on the dyno with the new mods?
You probably wouldn't see much on the dyno at all. The clutch won't get you power, the FAST will give you more in the midrange, but probably only 15-20 RWHP at peak, and the 4.10s though increasing acceleration rate, usually show about a 10 RWHP loss on the dyno compared to the stock 3.42s...so your numbers may inly increase slightly.
BUT....those mods will make the car feel like a new animal....the low and midrange punch will feel like you lost 500lbs from the weight of the car....the FAST and the 4.10s do amazing things, especially with the non Z51 tranny. Just do it, you wont regret it.
Forgive my newb ? , but why would the 4.10s not be as good in the z51??? I thought all of the m6's came with the same gearing stock...
nope Z51 has different gear ratios than Base car and F55. so 4.10s in a base car are almost like 3.90s in a Z51.
no Z51 for 2010 unless it changes at the last minute
Last edited by drivinfast; Sep 3, 2009 at 12:37 AM.
'05 C6 non Z51 w/G6X3 cam, LS6 ported heads, Lingenfelter ported LS2 Intake, ported TB, Vararam CAI, LG PRO LTs and Xpipe, B&B catback, tune. The car made 460rwhp 408rwtq and has ran 11.7 @ 125.7mph on the stock clutch. Adding a LS7 clutch/flywheel, FAST 92 and 4.10s, what do you think it should run?? and how much power would it pick up on the dyno with the new mods?
They arent for everyone. If you want to run the 1/4 then yes they are great - but you can do thatwith any ratio. With a HiHP Car you will be shifting constantly,every second, no matter what. I had my fun, got it out of my system, and ended up with 3.73's - I absolutely love them.
'05 C6 non Z51 w/G6X3 cam, LS6 ported heads, Lingenfelter ported LS2 Intake, ported TB, Vararam CAI, LG PRO LTs and Xpipe, B&B catback, tune. The car made 460rwhp 408rwtq and has ran 11.7 @ 125.7mph on the stock clutch. Adding a LS7 clutch/flywheel, FAST 92 and 4.10s, what do you think it should run?? and how much power would it pick up on the dyno with the new mods?
Your clutch and gears will get you a 10.9 ET with a 125 trap speed. The issue is that the power boost from the FAST may just put you over the top on the trap speed unless you use a taller tire than 26". You are on the line for trap speed with 4.10's at the track so I'm going to let hell freeze over and advise you to get 3.90's for this reason. Many people report increases in MPH and being at 126 now will get you the magic 128mph after the mods. I doubt the majority will fight the 2.3mph from the FAST although maybe one will.
Anyway 3.90's will get you what you want.
The LS7 is an awesome clutch but just be warned not many people other than Ranger will say its cut out for the track.
The last point is you will only see such an ET if the tire is a MT ET street and you have a decent 60'. The LS7 isnt going to make that easy.
nope Z51 has different gear ratios than Base car and F55. so 4.10s in a base car are almost like 3.90s in a Z51.
no Z51 for 2010 unless it changes at the last minute
Could you go deeper into this if you don't mind??? How is the non f55 z51 car geared???
...The LS7 is an awesome clutch but just be warned not many people other than Ranger will say its cut out for the track....
SpinMonster, not sure where you got that idea. Wasn't from anything I've actually written. On the contrary....
I've posted hundreds of times (one example) that the LS7 clutch has an ugly personality. It's the worst clutch for the track that GM has ever put in a Corvette I've driven. It's ill-suited for a 420 RWTQ car, much less one with even more power.
The LS7 clutch has a propensity to glaze and won't accept a launch rpm above 3600-3700 without compromising the 60' and/or the 330'.
It also produces prodigious clutch dust of elemental iron and copper that attacks the seals in the hydraulics leading to pedal issues unless the fluid is kept clean.
I've managed to adapt my driving to the limitations of the LS7 clutch through experimentation. That led to fast times at the track, in spite of the clutch's foul personality. Were I not a stock guy, I'd go with a better clutch and run much faster times.
SpinMonster, not sure where you got that idea. Wasn't from anything I've actually written. On the contrary....
I've posted hundreds of times (one example) that the LS7 clutch has an ugly personality. It's the worst clutch for the track that GM has ever put in a Corvette I've driven. It's ill-suited for a 420 RWTQ car, much less one with even more power.
The LS7 clutch has a propensity to glaze and won't accept a launch rpm above 3600-3700 without compromising the 60' and/or the 330'.
It also produces prodigious clutch dust of elemental iron and copper that attacks the seals in the hydraulics leading to pedal issues unless the fluid is kept clean.
I've managed to adapt my driving to the limitations of the LS7 clutch through experimentation. That led to fast times at the track, in spite of the clutch's foul personality. Were I not a stock guy, I'd go with a better clutch and run much faster times.
Ranger
I was complimenting your having gotten good results with it at the track. I will avoid naming specific people from now on. It always backfires.
I have an LS7 clutch in my car with well over 700rwhp and have never changed the clutch fluid. It was already over 500 when I installed it with a fidanza flywheel. My pedal never sticks to the floor which I believe is only due to heat issues weakening the springs in the pressure plate. Since I never launch hard, it never super heats. Those who have had the pedal stick to the floor note its only for a few seconds and then the pedal works right again....with the same clutch fluid. If the clutch fluid was the culprit it would not fix itself until the fluid is changed. My current fluid is about 3 years old.
I guess all this means I too have adapted the driving style to the clutch limitations. I agree 100% with the launch rpm limitations.
...My pedal never sticks to the floor which I believe is only due to heat issues weakening the springs in the pressure plate. Since I never launch hard, it never super heats. Those who have had the pedal stick to the floor note its only for a few seconds and then the pedal works right again....with the same clutch fluid. If the clutch fluid was the culprit it would not fix itself until the fluid is changed. My current fluid is about 3 years old...
Most clutch pedal issues occur on high-rpm shifts, not launch. Literally thousands of C5/C6 owners have cured pedal issues by keeping the clutch fluid clean.