When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I want to buy a Corvette C6 Z06 but found some threads about problems with the LS7 engine, valves come loose and distroy the engine. This has happened to a few people with a low milage Z06. Is this a big problem or has just happened in a few cases. Otherwise I might go for C6 with the LS3 engine.
Generally speaking I think the cases you've read about are guys who are true enthusiasts who track their Z06's more so than the average LS3 guys do. Many also pump a significant amount of $$$ into their cars to take the performance to the next level on the track. All Vettes came from GM with a fair degree of design margin built in to get you that long warranty. The more you mod and the harder you drive em' the more you eat away at the margin. Perhaps the Z06 starts out closer to that margin and the guys you are reading about are stepping beyond the margin in some cases?...just a thought.
With that said...the LS3 does seem to be one tough hombre! It would be interesting to compare a Z06 to a new Grand Sport sporting just enough mods to bring it to the Z06 power level....it wouldn't take much to get there.
I have seen plenty of LS7 do fine on a road course. I have read many posts regarding a LS3 without a dry sump on a road course will not last (under racing conditions that is).
If you are not road racing it I guess it really doesnt matter so then I would probably go with a LS3 S/C
All Vettes came from GM with a fair degree of design margin built in to get you that long warranty. The more you mod and the harder you drive em' the more you eat away at the margin. Perhaps the Z06 starts out closer to that margin and the guys you are reading about are stepping beyond the margin in some cases?
What does 'a fair degree of margin' mean? What is 'design margin'?
Like other GM engines the stock valves are garbage and when they break, people tend to not talk about it especially when they swapped cams and had no warranty. People dont publicize 'oops'.
I've owned both. Both engines are incredibly stout. But while the LS3 is "bad", the LS7 is just "badder". Just casually driving the LS7's torque is always felt.
To answer you question, there are no inherit design flaws in either engine.
I've owned both. Both engines are incredibly stout. But while the LS3 is "bad", the LS7 is just "badder". Just casually driving the LS7's torque is always felt.
To answer you question, there are no inherit design flaws in either engine.
Your statements are true of stock engines.
As far as flaws, under boost the stock LS7 is not as stronge due to thinner piston skirts. At higher power levels the LS7 cant be fitted with a double roller timing chain.
Personally I think the LS3 is the best engine GM ever produced and the current Grand Sport can be made into one heck of a machine. TR6060 and a motor that loves boost.
As far as flaws, under boost the stock LS7 is not as stronge due to thinner piston skirts. At higher power levels the LS7 cant be fitted with a double roller timing chain.
Personally I think the LS3 is the best engine GM ever produced and the current Grand Sport can be made into one heck of a machine. TR6060 and a motor that loves boost.
I wouldn't call that a "flaw", which implies some sort of mistake. It is what it is and does what it was designed for exceptionally.
Start modifying either engine and you'll have to deal with different issues depending on which direction you take.
Best engine? Depends on what you mean by that, but I'd say the LS9 is king followed by the LS7 for n/a.
Last edited by AirBusPilot; Dec 15, 2009 at 08:30 PM.
The LS9 is a slightly modified LS3. GM knew which motor was stouter and which would hold boost without issues.
The choice really depends on what the intended use is and if the motor will be modded or not.
San
I wouldn't call a blower/internal forgings/revised block "slightly modified".
All of these LSx engines are very closely related. You can speculate on which one modified is the "best". But, based on whats sitting on the showroom floor it's LS9 followed by LS7 followed by LS3, etc., as power is the only real difference between them that you'll ever notice. Other than that, they'll all get you to and from the grocery store equally well.
If you want a Z06, buy it. You are getting a lot more car than just more engine. There is no systemic problem with the Z06 motors. There were great deals on lightly used Z06's here, hopefully you can find a good one over there.
I wouldn't call a blower/internal forgings/revised block "slightly modified".
All of these LSx engines are very closely related. You can speculate on which one modified is the "best". But, based on whats sitting on the showroom floor it's LS9 followed by LS7 followed by LS3, etc., as power is the only real difference between them that you'll ever notice. Other than that, they'll all get you to and from the grocery store equally well.
Everything I've read says the 2009 and newer LS3 and LS9 are the same block, block being the key word here. A block doesn't include the supercharger obviously and I don't have any concrete information on the LS9 internals.
My point is that GM chose to build their ultimate powerplant on the LS3 platform, not the LS7. They both have their strengths and weaknesses, so let's not turn this into a pissing contest. The thin walls of the LS7 IMHO aren't really conducive to boost, although some do it anyway. I have an LS2 so I don't really have a dog in this fight.
Shouldn't be..."Design Margin" is a very basic concept understood and used throughout the manufacturing industry....automobiles included! If SPIN isn't familiar with the concept I'd recommend he spend 15 minutes with GOOGLE and he'll be able to answer his own question.
Last edited by Motorhead-47; Dec 15, 2009 at 09:38 PM.
Everything I've read says the 2009 and newer LS3 and LS9 are the same block, block being the key word here. A block doesn't include the supercharger obviously and I don't have any concrete information on the LS9 internals.
My point is that GM chose to build their ultimate powerplant on the LS3 platform, not the LS7. They both have their strengths and weaknesses, so let's not turn this into a pissing contest. The thin walls of the LS7 IMHO aren't really conducive to boost, although some do it anyway. I have an LS2 so I don't really have a dog in this fight.
San
Unfortunately, the thread got off track a little when "boost" was brought up.
I understand the reasons why GM chose a smaller displacement for the LS9. Cubic inches are controlling in an n/a application. In a boosted application it's not near as important as the s/c supplies the air. Yes, given the confines of the external dimensions of the LSx blocks, it is better to have more "meat" between the cylinders if you're going to use a s/c. But means little otherwise, practically speaking.
How much boost an LS7 can take is not the point. (And I wonder where all the broken block LS7 threads are that happened on boosted applications?)
Last edited by AirBusPilot; Dec 15, 2009 at 09:37 PM.
Shouldn't be..."Design Margin" is a very basic concept understood and used throughout the manufacturing industry....automobiles included!
Yes it is a very basic concept, but no one designs a with a "fair degree of design margin". Design margin depends on the application and is expressed as a better than quantity which I am sure you learned in introductory engineering classes.
Yes it is a very basic concept, but no one designs a with a "fair degree of design margin". Design margin depends on the application and is expressed as a better than quantity which I am sure you learned in introductory engineering classes.
That post was my causual choice of words without any attempt to drill down to any specific application. It seems you'd like to pick a fight. I'm not interested.