C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Best cam for the LS2 heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2010, 04:34 PM
  #21  
C6nexttime
Instructor
 
C6nexttime's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Advanced induction is the place to go get your 243's done. Over on the gto boards AI ported 243 heads are on some of the fastest gto's. TEA (total engine airflow) is probobly just as good. I only give AI the nod because they designed that port originally for gm. They know the head. Both places will do you up good and cost about 1200. I have talked to both and they both told me when you already have 243 heads there is no point in buying an aftermarket casting, Heard it from brian tooley himself. Ask ecs how they like the TEA 243's.
Old 10-09-2010, 05:50 PM
  #22  
AirBusPilot
Le Mans Master
 
AirBusPilot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 5,582
Received 59 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

I thought stock head LS3's were getting 500 rwhp with a 230 spin cam and stock intake manifold? 6.2L v. 6.0L, but it should be close to that?
Old 10-09-2010, 06:52 PM
  #23  
Joe_G
Tech Contributor
 
Joe_G's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 14,942
Received 252 Likes on 217 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default

Originally Posted by AirBusPilot
I thought stock head LS3's were getting 500 rwhp with a 230 spin cam and stock intake manifold? 6.2L v. 6.0L, but it should be close to that?
No. Stock ls2's are about 340. Ls3's are 380 which is about what ls2's make with full bolt ons except Fast intake. When you add a sizable cam to both the ls2 is 450 ish to 470 and the ls3 is 480 ish and some get close to 500.

The additional cubes help a lot.
Old 10-10-2010, 07:48 AM
  #24  
musicman2
Instructor
 
musicman2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2010
Location: Spring Lake Michigan
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C6nexttime
Advanced induction is the place to go get your 243's done. Over on the gto boards AI ported 243 heads are on some of the fastest gto's. TEA (total engine airflow) is probobly just as good. I only give AI the nod because they designed that port originally for gm. They know the head. Both places will do you up good and cost about 1200. I have talked to both and they both told me when you already have 243 heads there is no point in buying an aftermarket casting, Heard it from brian tooley himself. Ask ecs how they like the TEA 243's.
THANKS !! for this info------will check them out !!
Old 10-10-2010, 08:01 AM
  #25  
LSCHLEM
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LSCHLEM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: READING PA
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10

Default

Originally Posted by musicman2
THANKS !! for this info------will check them out !!
Just one more thing. The stock or reworked 243 Heads will have poor resell
value. By the time you are done you will have spent close to the cost of the TF 225's. You can sell your stock heads and add to that to get the
TF's. They will make so much more power. I got about 50 rw from the trick flows and the 243's had patriot springs etc. There is no comparison as the TF's and the FAST 102 took me to 507 RWHP.
Old 10-10-2010, 08:38 AM
  #26  
C6nexttime
Instructor
 
C6nexttime's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Here ya go man, gto with AI heads through a stall. 503rwhp
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...st-2009-a.html

Another gto with AI ported heads and vrx5 cam put down 494rwhp

The tfs heads are a very nice piece and so are the afr 230 heads but both come at a substantial price increase. The tfs require roller rockers which brings the cost up to 2900 and the pat g afr 230 head was custom tweaked and cost 3600. They are not worth 2k more.
Old 10-10-2010, 09:27 AM
  #27  
Mez
Safety Car
 
Mez's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 1999
Location: Austin, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Houston, Dallas, Hong Kong, Elgin, etc.. Texas
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C6nexttime
Here ya go man, gto with AI heads through a stall. 503rwhp
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...st-2009-a.html

Another gto with AI ported heads and vrx5 cam put down 494rwhp

The tfs heads are a very nice piece and so are the afr 230 heads but both come at a substantial price increase. The tfs require roller rockers which brings the cost up to 2900 and the pat g afr 230 head was custom tweaked and cost 3600. They are not worth 2k more.
A few of the aftermarket head manufacturers recommend roller rockers with cams that have lift over .550 inch to improve the geometry and reduce side loads on the guides. According to what I have read, stock rockers have less than ideal geometry as lift increases beyond .550 inch and more valve guide wear. So if you are using the 243 heads with a higher life cam, like me, roller rockers are recommended.

From a cost vs. power increase perspective, its hard not to go with aftermarket heads. However, you can make the mistake of going with the wrong ones. The other day, I learned of a LS1 Corvette with big port stage III heads that made 20 less RWHP than a set of smaller, ported GM heads. Bigger heads are not always better. Velocity is the name of the game and to maximize torque and power, the port size has to be right.

Last edited by Mez; 10-11-2010 at 05:50 PM.
Old 10-10-2010, 04:49 PM
  #28  
musicman2
Instructor
 
musicman2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2010
Location: Spring Lake Michigan
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C6nexttime
Here ya go man, gto with AI heads through a stall. 503rwhp
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...st-2009-a.html

Another gto with AI ported heads and vrx5 cam put down 494rwhp

The tfs heads are a very nice piece and so are the afr 230 heads but both come at a substantial price increase. The tfs require roller rockers which brings the cost up to 2900 and the pat g afr 230 head was custom tweaked and cost 3600. They are not worth 2k more.
HEY ---THANKS AGAIN !! Sent you a PM
Old 10-10-2010, 05:05 PM
  #29  
AirBusPilot
Le Mans Master
 
AirBusPilot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 5,582
Received 59 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Joe_G
No. Stock ls2's are about 340. Ls3's are 380 which is about what ls2's make with full bolt ons except Fast intake. When you add a sizable cam to both the ls2 is 450 ish to 470 and the ls3 is 480 ish and some get close to 500.

The additional cubes help a lot.
I just keep hearing about how the LS3 head is so inferior to these aftermarket heads, but 500 rwhp is easily achieved with a mild cam and the stock LS3 heads.

Also, the hp difference between and LS2 and LS3 has alot to do with the LS3 heads, not so much 0.2 L, IMO.
Old 10-10-2010, 09:41 PM
  #30  
riggs 74
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
riggs 74's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: springfield ohio
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Is the LS3 (823) head really producing 500rwhp stock with bolt ons?
I looked the other day at the LS3 heads and seen that I could
pick up a set new for around 1600 and I just looked at some used
sources and found them for under a thousand.

I was hoping to stay with the 243 castings, and may still do that
but I don't want any regrets later after the build is all complete.

Keep the Information coming, I appreciate all input.


Riggs.

Last edited by riggs 74; 10-10-2010 at 09:45 PM.
Old 10-10-2010, 10:22 PM
  #31  
oldmansan
Safety Car
 
oldmansan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Los Alamitos California
Posts: 4,359
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09

Default

I'd listen to Spin. If Spin told me I was spelling my name wrong I'd probably have to change my name. There are those that know what they're talking about, and then there's Spin.

Spin's probably the only person I've never met personally that I'd leave my Corvette with. He drips of professionalism and integrity. He stands behind any work he's ever done, and that's something missing from almost everyone.

San
Old 10-10-2010, 10:49 PM
  #32  
AirBusPilot
Le Mans Master
 
AirBusPilot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 5,582
Received 59 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by riggs 74
Is the LS3 (823) head really producing 500rwhp stock with bolt ons?
I looked the other day at the LS3 heads and seen that I could
pick up a set new for around 1600 and I just looked at some used
sources and found them for under a thousand.

I was hoping to stay with the 243 castings, and may still do that
but I don't want any regrets later after the build is all complete.

Keep the Information coming, I appreciate all input.


Riggs.
Spinmonster designed a 230 cam for AndrewZPSU's 08' LS3. Stock LS3 heads, just cam, headers, cai, CB and DR's and he ran 11.1 at 129 mph (504 rwhp). Great drivability.

Spin himself above seems to think there are better heads, but with results like Andrew's car, I don't see the problem

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...p-records.html

Originally Posted by SpinMonster
The last forum member to use my 230XFI/234XER 114+2 got 504rwhp/461rwtq.

It was an independent tuner and install.

At 4 degrees overlap, its a great driving cam.

Cam only (no head mods) with bolt-ons.
The above quote by Spin is from the link and it is referencing Andrew's stock head LS3 car.

Considering the large price difference between off the shelf LS3 heads and aftermarket, I don't see much value of upgrading to aftermarket and only gain a few hp. Maybe Spin will clarify this.

Last edited by AirBusPilot; 10-13-2010 at 07:29 PM.
Old 10-12-2010, 03:05 AM
  #33  
PRE-Z06
Race Director

 
PRE-Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,120
Received 2,054 Likes on 1,306 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SpinMonster
and for those that dont know, trap speed is an indication of power made with little driver skill affecting it unlike ETs which has a good indication of driver skill. Both good and bad drivers will have nearly identicle trap speeds so its a good indicator of average power being made. (The only variable being DA)
you've made enough passes in a manual to know driver shift speed and track prep effect mph, plus comparing mph from all over the country in different weather conditions isn't exactly a fair judgement imho...fwiw we've had a 5.7l gto make 495rwhp with TSP 243s and a mid 230s cam

Last edited by PRE-Z06; 10-12-2010 at 03:07 AM.
Old 10-13-2010, 05:34 PM
  #34  
C6nexttime
Instructor
 
C6nexttime's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The ls3 head is awesome but many people screw up and use 1 7/8 headers. The 1.59 exhaust valve in the ls3 heads likes 1 3/4 headers better. If you notice some of the fast spin cam cars are using 1 3/4 headers.
Old 10-14-2010, 10:13 AM
  #35  
Neumonic2002
Drifting
 
Neumonic2002's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: STL MO
Posts: 1,796
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10

Default

Originally Posted by AirBusPilot
Spinmonster designed a 230 cam for AndrewZPSU's 08' LS3. Stock LS3 heads, just cam, headers, cai, CB and DR's and he ran 11.1 at 129 mph (504 rwhp). Great drivability.

Spin himself above seems to think there are better heads, but with results like Andrew's car, I don't see the problem

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...p-records.html
I remember Patrick G showing a LS2 car that did 503 rwhp with stock 243 heads: http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...s-503rwhp.html

I read the long thread about LS2 VS. LS3 heads and came away thinking the LS3 style head shines on a larger displacement and the 243 style head is tough to beat on a 4" bore LS2.
Old 10-14-2010, 11:37 AM
  #36  
Mopower2007
Instructor
 
Mopower2007's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: Southeast TX
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I Have 243 heads enhanced by Performance Induction to LMR's stage 3R spec's, comp cams 54-459-11 (LSR) camshaft, Fast 90 unported intake with LG 1.75" headers, 6 speed tranny. Car layed down 487 rwhp & 440 rwtq thru 3.90 gears in the middle of the Texas summer. Very streetable, this cam isn't designed for max HP. Factory heads can perform for less money. If FI was in the cars future I believe aftermarket heads are better because of a thicker deck. I have no regrets. Just my .02 cents.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXfkePZR5bA
Old 10-17-2010, 08:14 AM
  #37  
riggs 74
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
riggs 74's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: springfield ohio
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I wanted to stop back in and say thanks for a the guidance. I will
need you help again in the future and hope that I don't become a
pest.

Thanks guys
Riggs.

Get notified of new replies

To Best cam for the LS2 heads

Old 10-17-2010, 08:31 AM
  #38  
CTD
Melting Slicks
 
CTD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Sicamous BC
Posts: 2,396
Received 51 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

I sent you a PM, I have a used set of used Mamofied AFR 205's coming up for sale shortly.
Old 10-17-2010, 03:43 PM
  #39  
JayplaySS2
Melting Slicks
 
JayplaySS2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mopower2007
I Have 243 heads enhanced by Performance Induction to LMR's stage 3R spec's, comp cams 54-459-11 (LSR) camshaft, Fast 90 unported intake with LG 1.75" headers, 6 speed tranny. Car layed down 487 rwhp & 440 rwtq thru 3.90 gears in the middle of the Texas summer. Very streetable, this cam isn't designed for max HP. Factory heads can perform for less money. If FI was in the cars future I believe aftermarket heads are better because of a thicker deck. I have no regrets. Just my .02 cents.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXfkePZR5bA

231/239 is your cam design and since I am thinking of an EPS lob'd 233/239, I have to ask- How are the street manners? I know you say it's streetable but more input would be cool. What rockers and push rods are you running? What cai as well? What cc chambers?

With a 102, rockers, stout pushrods and a SD tune, I can see picking up some good power.

Thank you-

Jason
Old 10-18-2010, 11:37 AM
  #40  
Mopower2007
Instructor
 
Mopower2007's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: Southeast TX
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JayplaySS2
231/239 is your cam design and since I am thinking of an EPS lob'd 233/239, I have to ask- How are the street manners? I know you say it's streetable but more input would be cool. What rockers and push rods are you running? What cai as well? What cc chambers?

With a 102, rockers, stout pushrods and a SD tune, I can see picking up some good power.

Thank you-

Jason
My cam is the Comp Cams 281LR HR13 (231/239 & .617/.624), Stage 3R LS6 heads (2.10 int/ 1.575 ex with 240 cc runners) milled for static CR of 11.2:1 done by Performance Induction. Comp pushrods & lifters. Stock rockers.UD pulley. 160 deg stat. Ron Davis radiator. Unported Fast 90. RPS twin disc carbon clutch. LG Pro longtube headers. Varam CAI. DTE stage 3 differential w/ 3.90's. Toyo R888 rear tires (stick like glue on the street).

Car sounds awesome at idle with some body shake, no driveabilty issues at all concerning the cam, and runs like a bat outta he!!.The RPS clutch is like a light switch. On or off. That took some getting used to, nothing to do with the cam. Again, I have no regrets and can only share with you the results of my build which I'm very pleased with. Good luck and hope this helps. PS- Best advise I can give you is seek professional advice, use internet forums for info only.

Last edited by Mopower2007; 10-18-2010 at 11:44 AM.


Quick Reply: Best cam for the LS2 heads



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 AM.