When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Two points:
1. I've had two cars that were highly modified and no cats. Never had a gas smell problem. Both cars had a multi-spark ignition system, and I believe that makes a difference.
2. HP gains depend on how much air the engine is pumping. A supercharged/turbo car will gain more HP without cats than a NA car.
If you have to ask, you're not running fast enough to matter if you loose 2 HP to good hi-flow cats.
I have the LG pros with cats. I can see light right through the cats; it's not like trying to look through the old ceramic bricks. I've gone catless in the past and a good tune does get you most of the way there in terms of avoiding the smell. It's still a little better with cats.
I agree with Walt. You're driving in the NE where the air quality frequently sucks during the summer. Running high flow cats is a reasonable thing to do. If you do get stopped, relocated cats might get a ticket, but not always. I've read at least one instance where a catless car was impounded on the spot. Not worth the risk to me.
I am sure in most states it isn't legal to modify your exhaust in anyway. Just as a point. So a man has to do what a man has to do. Good luck in what u decide.
I had kooks and borla stingers on mine. First, I was running no cats. Even after the tune, the gas smell was pretty bad and my exhaust tips were impossible to keep clean. I went ahead and switched out the x-pipe for the one with high-flow cats....no more smell, no more black tips and I couldn't notice any difference in power AT ALL.
did the exhaust note change when you put the cats in? alot?
From: Cape May, NJ; Guntersville, AL; Orange Beach, AL
Originally Posted by Walt White Coupe
Ok get caught for what??? Hello
1. Not registering your car where you live.
2. Not giving your insurance company your correct address.
3. Removing your cats is a federal crime.
Trivial? Maybe for you, not for me.
It's the air I breathe you'd be polluting.
The less you pay in insurance the more I pay.
Are you serious??? I have houses in NJ, AL, and FL. My insurance agent knows my car is in NJ and has no issues with it. You are right, I bet I'm the reason your insurance rates are more than they should be. Couldn't be the ten's of thousand's of uninsured motorist that have accidents with insured motorists yearly and their insurance has to eat the cost. Hate to break it to you but I'm not breaking any laws. You need to relax. If you are worried about pollution so much you might want to go trade your vette and get a volt, or better yet a bike. I was just asking a question. If you are so worried about me not running cat's I don't even want to think about what your stance on Nascar is. No need to freak out. I actually didn't know much on the subject that's why I asked and would like to thank everyone that was helpful.
Last edited by gunterwalker; Feb 6, 2011 at 08:01 PM.
Also, after your car is tuned up you will hardly smell anything at all. I've never had anyone complain about a smell (or even notice one) and have talked with my tuner on more than one occassion about the catless situation and how neither of us understand what everyone complains about.
Once the car is properly leaned out they seem to smell just fine.
Not running cats is a federal offense even if your state doesnt require a sniffer or safety inspection. If your car is in a serious accident, they check equipment when law suits are in the works. The fine is $10,000. Its a gamble.
It doesnt cost you any real power to run cats and it smells better. Being envirnmentally responsible isnt going to cost power.
I run cats and dont have a sniffer or safety inspection where I live.
Last edited by SpinMonster; Feb 7, 2011 at 06:11 AM.
Sounds like there really is no upside to not having cats. But if the OP decides to leave them out anyway and gets caught, sounds like from what he's posted that a $10,000 fine would be no problem for him.
Excuse me, I didn't hug my tree yet.
On all my peformance cars I have run no cats and in PA if you drive under 5000 miles a year you are emissions exempt. On my turbo cars I have lost 15whp by running high flow cats and they only seem to last a max of 6 months before they are blown to itty bitty pieces out the exhaust. Now I just choose not to run them since I only drive the vette 3000 miles a year and didnt have to pay the extra money for them. I'm not saying you'll blow out the cats in the vette as that will most likely never happen. My turbo car was running 30 psi of boost and the car was on a 2 step at the track and I was tired of spending $200 everytime I blew it out. I think its just personal opinion if you want them get them if not I have noticed no ill side effects from not having them.
On my turbo cars I have lost 15whp by running high flow cats and they only seem to last a max of 6 months before they are blown to itty bitty pieces out the exhaust... I'm not saying you'll blow out the cats in the vette as that will most likely never happen. My turbo car was running 30 psi of boost and the car was on a 2 step at the track and I was tired of spending $200 everytime I blew it out.
I've seen others with FI report problems with the cats failing too. Seems to be a bigger problem for FI than for the average NA build, although the 2 step as you mentioned probably wasn't helping things.
My statement is based on my experience. With the offroad x-pipe and Corsa Sport vs cats was as not even close. I had massive drone in the 16-1700 range and you could hear me coming from 1/2 mile away. I went back to high flow cats and the sound was immediately to quiet so I switched to Corsa Xtreme. There's no way the sound cannot drastically change between the two. BTW...to me that clip is docile compared to my previous and present setup but audio clips are not always accurate.