C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Catch-cup runeth over?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 09:46 AM
  #1  
Thrash's Avatar
Thrash
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 166
From: Summerton SC
Tech Contributor
Default Catch-cup runeth over?

I ordered the "see-through" catch-can and installed it 3 days ago. After about 125 miles of driving (some 20 miles being spirited) the cup is already about 1/3 full? I checked it this morning and took the photo.

Seems to be a lot, what do you think? Does this seem normal? Maybe I need a bigger can, as the jar is only 2.5" tall?

Lastly I'm supposed to pour the oil back into the crankcase, right?

Thanks O' Great Forum ...
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 10:11 AM
  #2  
Thrash's Avatar
Thrash
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 166
From: Summerton SC
Tech Contributor
Default

Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 10:20 AM
  #3  
FloydSummerOf68's Avatar
FloydSummerOf68
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,331
Likes: 18
From: Missouri City Texas
Default

I'd say it was a needed purchase
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 10:28 AM
  #4  
taken19's Avatar
taken19
Track Junky
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,074
Likes: 36
From: Orlando Area
Tech Contributor
Default

My see through was about half full in about 100 miles of spirited driving. I thought that was a bit much, but it looks like you are I the same boat as me. When I pulled my heads for a H/C swap, I couldn't believe the amount of carbon buildup on the pistons, most likely attributed to the oil.

I would not pour the oil back in. There is a possibility that it could have contaminants in it and I wouldn't take the risk.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 10:31 AM
  #5  
Boomer111's Avatar
Boomer111
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,999
Likes: 200
From: Bay Area Ca.
Default

That just nuts!

Catch cans are not CARB approved in California.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 10:32 AM
  #6  
Thrash's Avatar
Thrash
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 166
From: Summerton SC
Tech Contributor
Default

Originally Posted by taken19
My see through was about half full in about 100 miles of spirited driving. I thought that was a bit much, but it looks like you are I the same boat as me. When I pulled my heads for a H/C swap, I couldn't believe the amount of carbon buildup on the pistons, most likely attributed to the oil.

I would not pour the oil back in. There is a possibility that it could have contaminants in it and I wouldn't take the risk.
Thanks much, really love the forum ...
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 10:45 AM
  #7  
taken19's Avatar
taken19
Track Junky
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,074
Likes: 36
From: Orlando Area
Tech Contributor
Default



This was after about 100 miles of driving. Notice the specs of dust/dirt mixed in - that's why I wouldn't re-use. Just chalk it up to "used" oil...





Pics when I first popped the stock heads off at 38k miles. The catch can was only installed about 1000 miles at this point. There were places where the carbon buildup was 1/16" thick! I couldn't believe it for such low mileage.

Remember that these carbon deposits can cause hot spots and create detonation and reduced engine performance. I have recently switched to an Elite Engineering catch can, a much better design and much larger catch reservoir. This means less frequent dumps. I couldn't go a full gas tank with the see through one.

Hope this helps, Sean
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 10:52 AM
  #8  
taken19's Avatar
taken19
Track Junky
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,074
Likes: 36
From: Orlando Area
Tech Contributor
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer111
That just nuts!

Catch cans are not CARB approved in California.
That sucks. Could you install one for everyday driving and swap back for inspection purposes? It only takes about 10 minutes.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 11:42 AM
  #9  
Thrash's Avatar
Thrash
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 166
From: Summerton SC
Tech Contributor
Default

Originally Posted by taken19
That sucks. Could you install one for everyday driving and swap back for inspection purposes? It only takes about 10 minutes.
It's really easy to pull the hoses off and if you put your own loop-hose that can come on and off easily (not using clips), that way a switch out would only take a minute ...
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 03:31 PM
  #10  
taken19's Avatar
taken19
Track Junky
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,074
Likes: 36
From: Orlando Area
Tech Contributor
Default

One additional thought. After a few months I noticed that the oil collection slowed down and thought it may be that cylindrical filter at the top. After drilling several angled 1/16" holes, the oil collection went back to "normal". I'm not sure if that made a difference or I just happened to change driving habits for a short period of time, but I though it may be worth mentioning.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 10:35 PM
  #11  
Joe_G's Avatar
Joe_G
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,950
Likes: 264
From: St. Louis, MO
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Those compressed air filters are made to get water out of compressed air. They don't work long term for collecting oil mist.

I suggest you get a real catch can. I have an AMW, Tracey Lewis makes a good one with a real pcv valve. He has a great write up here.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...-catchcan.html

Don't dump that oil back in the crankcase. It's full of nasty stuff.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 10:45 PM
  #12  
Gearhead Jim's Avatar
Gearhead Jim
Team Owner
Supporting Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 25,001
Likes: 2,702
From: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
St. Jude Donor '13
Default

Originally Posted by Thrash
I ordered the "see-through" catch-can and installed it 3 days ago. After about 125 miles of driving (some 20 miles being spirited) the cup is already about 1/3 full? I checked it this morning and took the photo.

Seems to be a lot, what do you think? Does this seem normal? Maybe I need a bigger can, as the jar is only 2.5" tall?

Lastly I'm supposed to pour the oil back into the crankcase, right?

Thanks O' Great Forum ...
I don't doubt your honesty, but I don't understand how you can be catching that much oil.

Oil consumption on our stock 2009 LS3 (no catch can) is so low that it's difficult to measure, would probably work out to one qt per 20k-24k miles. Many other people report similar numbers. So even if we had a system that caught all of the oil being used, it still wouldn't be catching as much as you are.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2011 | 01:09 AM
  #13  
C7/Z06 Man's Avatar
C7/Z06 Man
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 451
From: Maryland
Default

I installed one of these in my 2010 GS. Even with a few trips to the 1/4 mile track in 150 miles of driving I collected one teaspoon of oil in the cup which looks like a lot; but the math works out to be 1/2 QT. in 14,400 miles. So I would measure the amount your actually collecting to the miles traveled.

Dump the oil before it reaches the bottom of the so called filter which does not take long for me.

Edit: Go back and look at "taken19" pic of just the clear container and notice how big the end of his thumb looks compared to the container and/or oil in the container. PS: looks to me that these things are doing their job.

Last edited by C7/Z06 Man; Aug 1, 2011 at 01:41 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2011 | 04:22 AM
  #14  
Joe_G's Avatar
Joe_G
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,950
Likes: 264
From: St. Louis, MO
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by Gearhead Jim
I don't doubt your honesty, but I don't understand how you can be catching that much oil.

Oil consumption on our stock 2009 LS3 (no catch can) is so low that it's difficult to measure, would probably work out to one qt per 20k-24k miles. Many other people report similar numbers. So even if we had a system that caught all of the oil being used, it still wouldn't be catching as much as you are.
That level of consumption looks just about right to me. If you putter about town, you won't use much oil. If you race your car, or drive in a spirited manner, particularly with the engine at high revs, low load, thus high vacuum conditions, you'll draw up a lot of oil into the intake.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2011 | 11:11 AM
  #15  
5 Liter Eater's Avatar
5 Liter Eater
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,472
Likes: 38
From: Houston TX
St. Jude Donor '11
Default

I'd like to hear/see how you have it routed. That much in ~125 miles seems like alot.

PS: Do not re-use the oil.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2011 | 12:03 PM
  #16  
NYC6's Avatar
NYC6
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 21,136
Likes: 212
From: Long Island New York
Default

Do not pour it back into the crank case! It is oil heavily diluted with gasoline, H2O and sediment. Only fresh oil into the engine supply.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #17  
99c54me's Avatar
99c54me
Racer
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 357
Likes: 2
From: San Diego ,CA, USA
Default

I do not know or pretend to know the reason some LS engines have this problem and others don't. My present LS3 doe snot seem to use any oil at all that I can measure between oil changes. Prior LS engines I have owned did use oil, maybe 1 qt every 1,500 miles (more when driven spirited, less on the hwy.

Either way that top end lubrication excuse strikes me as BS and if I had an oil user again I would try to catch all I could.

There have been some good write ups on this. I have a co-worker that routed the back valve cover opening and merged it with the existing path, says he reduced oil usage a bunch. Theory was less suction in one path vs two reduced the bad effect. He found the suggestion on this awesome forum a coupe years ago.

Also there are some not so great write ups on this topic so keep your BS detector on at all times when reading.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Catch-cup runeth over?

Old Aug 4, 2011 | 12:40 AM
  #18  
HOXXOH's Avatar
HOXXOH
Race Director
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,557
Likes: 2,106
From: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Default

Originally Posted by taken19
I would not pour the oil back in. There is a possibility that it could have contaminants in it and I wouldn't take the risk.
Originally Posted by taken19
Notice the specs of dust/dirt mixed in - that's why I wouldn't re-use. Just chalk it up to "used" oil...
Originally Posted by Joe_G
Don't dump that oil back in the crankcase. It's full of nasty stuff.
Originally Posted by 5 Liter Eater
PS: Do not re-use the oil.
Originally Posted by NYC6
Do not pour it back into the crank case! It is oil heavily diluted with gasoline, H2O and sediment. Only fresh oil into the engine supply.
What makes this oil any different by being caught in a catch can, than any other oil in the engine?

If the rate collected is about 1/2 quart in 10K miles, where does the 5 quarts go in a 100K motor that never had a catch can?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2011 | 04:20 AM
  #19  
taken19's Avatar
taken19
Track Junky
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,074
Likes: 36
From: Orlando Area
Tech Contributor
Default

Originally Posted by HOXXOH
What makes this oil any different by being caught in a catch can, than any other oil in the engine?

If the rate collected is about 1/2 quart in 10K miles, where does the 5 quarts go in a 100K motor that never had a catch can?
The truth is that there may be no difference at all. The concern is that you could be putting bad (contaminated) oil back into the engine. It could have no effect or it could end up damaging the motor or accelerating the normal wear. But why would you take the risk for a few dollars of new oil? Is it worth risking potential damage to the motor? Not in my opinion.

The goal of this forum is to share ideas and best practices among fellow car enthusiasts. Readers should consider the information they read here and filter it for themselves when making decisions.

To answer your other question, the oil that the catch can does not collect goes into the intake manifold and the combustion chamber. This can cause carbon deposits and potential hot spots. I pulled my heads at 38k and couldn't believe the amount to carbon buildup without the catch can. Look at the pics I posted above to get an idea

Last edited by taken19; Aug 4, 2011 at 04:24 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2011 | 09:05 AM
  #20  
HOXXOH's Avatar
HOXXOH
Race Director
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,557
Likes: 2,106
From: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Default

Originally Posted by taken19
The truth is that there may be no difference at all. The concern is that you could be putting bad (contaminated) oil back into the engine. It could have no effect or it could end up damaging the motor or accelerating the normal wear. But why would you take the risk for a few dollars of new oil? Is it worth risking potential damage to the motor? Not in my opinion.

The goal of this forum is to share ideas and best practices among fellow car enthusiasts. Readers should consider the information they read here and filter it for themselves when making decisions.

To answer your other question, the oil that the catch can does not collect goes into the intake manifold and the combustion chamber. This can cause carbon deposits and potential hot spots. I pulled my heads at 38k and couldn't believe the amount to carbon buildup without the catch can. Look at the pics I posted above to get an idea
My point was that the oil caught is no more contaminated than all the rest of the oil in the engine. The system doesn't separate bad oil from good oil unless you consider that the oil first caught after an oil change is less contaminated than any subsequent catch as the entire oil fill progressively degrades.

I knew where the oil went, but was joking. I suspect the carbon in your engine was more the result of the gas you use and your driving habits. I pulled my heads at 71K and had almost no buildup and had not used a catch can.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 PM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE