Cam Only??????
At what point does a car become something more than a cam only car?
I ask this because I am playing with my car to see how much I can get out of it before my next logical step would be a power adder.





100%Some see the phrase 'cam only' and might think that it designates a car with ONLY it's cam swapped out for another one but it almost never does. You generally wouldn't install a cam without also having other supporting bolt on pieces such as a cold air intake, headers and of course computer programming/tuning (otherwise the car might not even idle/run). And of course one would NEVER swap to an aggressive cam without also installing new valve springs, retainers, timing chain/sprockets and maybe even pushrods.
Generally speaking, the heads of a 'cam only' motor would have never been removed or had any reason to be.
The only time the valve covers/heads would even be touched is to install the valve springs/retainers.
Any kind of porting/polishing/milling/decking or even a basic valve job is considered 'head work' and would keep a car out of the 'cam only' category on most LSx racing or dyno lists.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Generally speaking, the heads of a 'cam only' motor would have never been removed or had any reason to be.
The only time the valve covers/heads would even be touched is to install the valve springs/retainers.
Any kind of porting/polishing/milling/decking or even a basic valve job is considered 'head work' and would keep a car out of the 'cam only' category on most LSx racing or dyno lists.


I also think the standard gas needs to be/should be whatever fuel is available in your area from any run-of-the-mill gas pump. 93, 91, 94, whatever. E85, while not as drastic of a difference for N/A cars compared to boosted cars, still allows some extra performance in the tune and as such, does not count IMO.
I think any fuel besides pump gas disqualifies you from being cam-only.
Just my $.02
Last edited by JUIC3D; May 9, 2012 at 09:54 AM. Reason: Edited for clarification


E85 comes from a pump but I don't consider it pump gas and I think it differentiates you from others. I think the same thing with meth in an N/A motor(although it is much less common).
They did away with that in our area like 7 or 8 years ago I think (it's Ultra 93 now).


E85 comes from a pump, but that's not "pump gas."
I do not personally run the stuff, but it is certainly widespread and available so much so that the government runs it in their cars.
As for if the heads come off the car means it's heads/cam car, that is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. So my car is a heads/cam car with 100% stock heads/gaskets because it has new lifters and arp bolts because it had a lifter problem with the originals?


I do not personally run the stuff, but it is certainly widespread and available so much so that the government runs it in their cars.
As for if the heads come off the car means it's heads/cam car, that is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. So my car is a heads/cam car with 100% stock heads/gaskets because it has new lifters and arp bolts because it had a lifter problem with the originals?
Would you consider a car that is tuned on race gas to be untouched or not modded at all?
Should the "bone stock" category apply to those who only have an E85 tune and nothing more, but pick up an additional 15-20whp compared to those with stock computer? I mean, they're just using pump gas, right?
E85 is essentially race gas and as such there is a substantial difference in cars that are tuned on it, and those that are not.
It's all really a moot point anyway because E85 will be gone, or at least the cheap prices will be gone, in the near future.
I think putting on thinner head gaskets is essentially the same as adding a lighter flywheel, or electric water pump, or porting an intake, in the realm of gains it provides. These things are all commonly considered in the "bolt on" category.
Thus I believe changing head gaskets does not put you in the Heads/Cam category.
Adding aftermarket heads, or even ported stock heads, is a different category from thinner head gaskets as a matter of indisputable fact...when it comes to the gains provided.
Others disagree with me, and that's fine, as these criterion are sort of bald men arguing over a comb....much ado about nothing as it doesn't matter!

OP a more salient demonstration would be my graph of my car showing results as the mods go up the ladder:
1. stock
2. bolt ons (headers, ported intake, tune)
3. cam only (including thinner head gaskets, which are smart to do with a cam to keep DCR up)
4. FAST
5. AFR 205 heads
My track results are in my sig, except stock with slicks which was 12.9@109.
Here is my graph:

And here is my thread with more information, including the effects of 4:10 gears on horsepower at various speeds...if you are interested.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...ast-heads.html


You do make a good point Joe as it really doesn't matter and there is a substantial difference in a .040 Cometic vs CNC ported Trickflow 235s.
Even the Corvette Forum fast list does not differentiate between cam-only and heads/cam, but I still maintain my opinion that to remain a cam-only car, the heads in their entirety need to remain untouched.
And even on the subject of the bottom end/shortblock, excessive oil consumption requiring a re-ring job or whatever, is that even still considered a 'stock bottom end' (again using all factory OEM parts)?
ARP bolts aren't factory of course but also offer no real power gain by themselves either, but the truth is they're still not 'stock'.
I don't have the answers either, but these types of discussions have been going on in the LSx world for at least 14 years now LOL.
I'm not sure if Atco has 100 unleaded (I know they have a 104 and higher) but I know Englishtown used to. And we even have a couple of regular gas stations that have 100 right at the pumps (off on it's own little island/area of course) as well.












