When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
If you want to believe that softer shocks make a big difference on ride quality I can't change your mind. Spring rate is what makes the ride, put 100 pounds in the back of the 'Vette and the car doesn't drop at all, put 100 pounds in the back of your Malibu and the bumper will drop a couple of inches. Springs, not shocks.
Springs determine how far the suspension will move under a load, but shocks control how quickly it will move.
When it comes to bumps, a suspension that can move quickly to handle the bump will produce a softer ride. That's why going from factory Z51 shocks on our car to factory base shocks, gave a much nicer ride on the frost-heaved roads of Illinois. That's also why the Tour setting on a F55 suspension gives a softer ride than Sport; the programming is more complicated but Tour allows the suspension to move more quickly when it hits a bump. The springs don't change, just the shocks.
With equal springs, softer shocks give a sorter ride.
With equal shocks, softer springs give a softer ride.
They are both part of the equation.
I will add that when hitting a deep bump at freeway speed the rear will seem to bottom out some, not badly but it will hit occasionally. My car has been lowered maybe 3/8 in.
This with the less travel of the FSD shock could be the reason, or a stiffer spring might be needed. Otherwise it rides and handles very well, level in turns and stable.
Maybe a raising a bit would take care of this but I am not that worried about it. With stock set up this did not occur but the suspension showed other traits that I wanted corrected mainly the bouncyness and leaning in turns. The FSD's are only a part of my changes as I already noted.
Old picture. Towed to a local meet just to aggravate some of the local purists.
If you want to believe that softer shocks make a big difference on ride quality I can't change your mind. Spring rate is what makes the ride, put 100 pounds in the back of the 'Vette and the car doesn't drop at all, put 100 pounds in the back of your Malibu and the bumper will drop a couple of inches. Springs, not shocks.
Excellent, that had to turn a few heads going down the road, thanks!
I will add that when hitting a deep bump at freeway speed the rear will seem to bottom out some, not badly but it will hit occasionally. My car has been lowered maybe 3/8 in.
This with the less travel of the FSD shock could be the reason, or a stiffer spring might be needed. Otherwise it rides and handles very well, level in turns and stable.
Maybe a raising a bit would take care of this but I am not that worried about it. With stock set up this did not occur but the suspension showed other traits that I wanted corrected mainly the bouncyness and leaning in turns. The FSD's are only a part of my changes as I already noted.
Interesting. I did note about a 1/4" drop all around after install, but haven't experienced any bottoming out with the FSDs.
OK so now back to my original question disregarding that thing they call a leaf spring because I will not be changing it. So the Softer shock will give a better ride and that would be the Bilstein HD correct? If I wanted to spend a little more money I could get the Koni FSD. I guess my best question will be, I feel like i'm riding around on rocks right now and from what I read the HD will put me into a smoother ride.If I go with Koni will there be as big a difference between the Koni and the Bilstein as there is between the Bilstein and the stock Z51 shocks. Like I said before this is my DD and I do not race it nor do I try 85 mph turns coming off the highway.
OK so now back to my original question disregarding that thing they call a leaf spring because I will not be changing it. So the Softer shock will give a better ride and that would be the Bilstein HD correct? If I wanted to spend a little more money I could get the Koni FSD. I guess my best question will be, I feel like i'm riding around on rocks right now and from what I read the HD will put me into a smoother ride.If I go with Koni will there be as big a difference between the Koni and the Bilstein as there is between the Bilstein and the stock Z51 shocks. Like I said before this is my DD and I do not race it nor do I try 85 mph turns coming off the highway.
The FSD ride is nothing like the Z51 ride concerning harshness.
FROM WHAT I HAVE READ PEOPLE SAY THE BILSTEIN HD SHOCK IS STIFFER THAN THE KONI FSD.
I have no bounce like stock shocks and no harshness like Z51 shocks, while running the FSD with coupe non Z51 springs.
I recommended the FSD for street only set up they are more than capable for spirited driving confidence as well as cruising comfort.
Last edited by Boomer111; May 10, 2013 at 02:19 PM.
There seems to be a huge variation in people's opinion of shocks, in particular the FSD's.
One respected member here put FSD's on his Z51 car and says, after lots of driving and comparing, that they seem just as stiff as the original factory Z51 shocks. Another member put them on his base suspension car and says that over bumps they are actually softer than the base shocks. They are both backed up by other members who say the same thing.
Somebody is wrong, but I can't tell you who it is.
I'm in the FSD "significantly better ride" camp. I also throw the car around quite a bit in autocrosses and can attest to their ability to help keep the car balanced during rapid lateral and fore-and-aft transitions. Great shock.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.