Front shocks
Anybody care to pipe up here? I sure would appreciate it.
Thanks!!
Last edited by meanjoe; Aug 3, 2014 at 10:27 PM.
as to Shocks Give Randy Rippie a call he can tell you just what to do or get you his shocks

Hopefully they will be back...............but don't hold your breath.

Right now. our choices are less
a few of the best are
LG Racing (forum vendor)
Doug Rippie (Forum vendor)
MTI Racing (forum vendor)
any of the above will help if you call
Damn. Well, when and if the shocks I have go bad, time to use Lou at LG Motorsports!!! I'll go to coil overs then. It'll **** off the wife, but you'se gots to do what you'se gots to do.
Feel free to call anytime to discuss coil overs and sway bars for your Z. You will not believe the difference they will make on your car. Check the links below for more info.
http://www.mtiracing.com/mti-racing-...-corvette.html
http://www.mtiracing.com/mti-bilstei...coilovers.html
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Feel free to call anytime to discuss coil overs and sway bars for your Z. You will not believe the difference they will make on your car. Check the links below for more info.
http://www.mtiracing.com/mti-racing-...-corvette.html
http://www.mtiracing.com/mti-bilstei...coilovers.html
I suggest you try the Bilstein Sports shocks. The cost is reasonable and there are many comments how these shocks help improve ride quality and reduce bump steer. Or, you could try a set of Grand Sport shocks from GM at further reduced cost, especially if you are not tracking the car. The GS shocks may give you a softer ride and reduce bump steer. For my GS, the shocks seem to be a good compromise for street duty. They are not Z-51 shocks, but specific built for the GS which seems to ride a little softer than the Z-51 I owned previously.
I suggest you try the Bilstein Sports shocks. The cost is reasonable and there are many comments how these shocks help improve ride quality and reduce bump steer. ly.
Isn't bump steer the movement of the wheels in relationship to arc of the movement? Just trying to understand because I bought these to solve the bump steer issue.
http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/pr...ear,-Pair.html
This link is for the rears, but I did the fronts.
i have double adj coil overs
Basics of Bumpsteer As the front wheels move up and down, we want the front wheels to maintain a particular direction. It's most important for the wheels to have minimal bump when we are negotiating the turns. There are certain elements of the construction of the front end components that will make this happen.
The angles of the upper and lower control arms, meaning a line extending through the center of rotation of the ball joints and inner mounts of each arm, intersect at a point we call the instant center (IC). This is one of the components used to determine the moment center location. In order to have near zero bumpsteer, the intended goal, we need to have the tie rods on each side point toward the IC for its side. This is one of two criteria for near zero B/S.
The other thing we need is for the tie rod to be a specific length. That length must be equal to the distance formed by 1) a line extending through the centers of rotation of the tie-rod ends, and 2) the tie-rod line intersection with a) lines extending through both the upper and lower ball joints, and b) the plane that passes through the inner chassis mounts. This can get a little complicated because although the ball joints do form a single line, the chassis mounts form a plane because of the front and rear mounts.
So, the inner tie-rod intersection point is where the tie-rod line intersects the plane of the inner mounts and the outer line intersection point is where it intersects the ball joint line. A three dimensional geometry program can simulate this very well, but most of us don't have the luxury of owning and knowing how to operate one of those.
Read more: http://www.circletrack.com/chassiste...#ixzz39YJIPl4S
Basics of Bumpsteer As the front wheels move up and down, we want the front wheels to maintain a particular direction. It's most important for the wheels to have minimal bump when we are negotiating the turns. There are certain elements of the construction of the front end components that will make this happen.
The angles of the upper and lower control arms, meaning a line extending through the center of rotation of the ball joints and inner mounts of each arm, intersect at a point we call the instant center (IC). This is one of the components used to determine the moment center location. In order to have near zero bumpsteer, the intended goal, we need to have the tie rods on each side point toward the IC for its side. This is one of two criteria for near zero B/S.
The other thing we need is for the tie rod to be a specific length. That length must be equal to the distance formed by 1) a line extending through the centers of rotation of the tie-rod ends, and 2) the tie-rod line intersection with a) lines extending through both the upper and lower ball joints, and b) the plane that passes through the inner chassis mounts. This can get a little complicated because although the ball joints do form a single line, the chassis mounts form a plane because of the front and rear mounts.
So, the inner tie-rod intersection point is where the tie-rod line intersects the plane of the inner mounts and the outer line intersection point is where it intersects the ball joint line. A three dimensional geometry program can simulate this very well, but most of us don't have the luxury of owning and knowing how to operate one of those.
Read more: http://www.circletrack.com/chassiste...#ixzz39YJIPl4S
Last edited by meanjoe; Aug 6, 2014 at 09:18 AM.
All I got.


















