When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Since getting my 13 base a year ago with just under 30k miles I've just used whatever top tier 93 was convenient. Recently my local station ran out of 93 and was selling 93 Ethanol free for the same price so I filled the tank. About 200 miles later I noticed a slightly smoother idle and an impressive 1.5 to 2 MPG increase. Went back the regular 93 and again within a few hundred miles the fuel economy dropped back.
Am I imagining this or is it possible this is better for the car. Price isn't horrible at 30 cent more.
Since getting my 13 base a year ago with just under 30k miles I've just used whatever top tier 93 was convenient. Recently my local station ran out of 93 and was selling 93 Ethanol free for the same price so I filled the tank. About 200 miles later I noticed a slightly smoother idle and an impressive 1.5 to 2 MPG increase. Went back the regular 93 and again within a few hundred miles the fuel economy dropped back.
Am I imagining this or is it possible this is better for the car. Price isn't horrible at 30 cent more.
Had same experience with my F150, consistent 1.5-2 mpg better with ethanol-free.
I do believe the vehicle manual specifically states do not use ethanol! FYI, I then asked a physical chemist why and the short answer is it's a high performance engine with very tight specifications and ethanol will damage the engine.
I do believe the vehicle manual specifically states do not use ethanol! FYI, I then asked a physical chemist why and the short answer is it's a high performance engine with very tight specifications and ethanol will damage the engine.
I know for 100% fact that even E85 is safe if the car is tuned for it.
Since getting my 13 base a year ago with just under 30k miles I've just used whatever top tier 93 was convenient. Recently my local station ran out of 93 and was selling 93 Ethanol free for the same price so I filled the tank. About 200 miles later I noticed a slightly smoother idle and an impressive 1.5 to 2 MPG increase. Went back the regular 93 and again within a few hundred miles the fuel economy dropped back.
Am I imagining this or is it possible this is better for the car. Price isn't horrible at 30 cent more.
Gas has a higher energy density than ethanol so not surprising to see an increase in mpg.
If there was a gas station near me that had ethanol-free 93, that's what I'd be using in all my vehicles.
I do believe the vehicle manual specifically states do not use ethanol! FYI, I then asked a physical chemist why and the short answer is it's a high performance engine with very tight specifications and ethanol will damage the engine.
The Corvette is 50 state compliant. There should be zero issues running ethanol as all states have oxygenated fuel. Ethanol is hard on plastic and rubber not made to be ethanol old resistant. All modern vehicles can safely use ethanol blended fuels.
Ethanol fuels have a 6 month life versus 1 year for non-ethanol. Since my 2 collector cars are not driven regularly, especially during the winter months, I use 93 octane ethanol free. Both Shell and Mobil have it in my town. Tends to be about 20 cents more, but who cares.
I do believe the vehicle manual specifically states do not use ethanol!
Not true.
Originally Posted by NDKiteBoarder
I then asked a physical chemist why and the short answer is it's a high performance engine with very tight specifications and ethanol will damage the engine.
A bunch of words that mean absolutely nothing! Not sure what "tight specifications" you're referring to or what a chemist has to do with anything here.
As someone else stated, the reason for the MPG increase is because gasoline has a higher energy density than ethanol.