When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Yes there is more power to be had. The air fuel ratio is rich from the factory.
Nice
I made a similar suggestion in another thread but in your case... i'd like to see what the car would do with the header and mild head porting (to just match the new bore size) to see what the combination will do and to see how much hp is left on the table by GM.
After a lot of testing we picked up 22HP and 22TQ. We used the 1 3/4" headers and high flow cats. Every thing else is stock. On the track we picked up 4 tenths and 6 MPH. They make more power rite off idle and all the way to the rev limiter. This is power you can really feel. The dyno graph will be posted tomorrow.
6 mph with 22hp???? This makes absolutely no sense.
I hate to be so blunt, but there are some pretty wild claims going around about the mods on C6's. The before and after's just don't add up.
Please give us your thoughts on why it would pick up 6mph with just 22 hp.
J, Not to speak for Cartek and their well known ability to make C5's and C6's fly but I think I can help answer the question. The power and torque gained from the Kook's headers were throughout the rpm range and not just at peak. Another major factor is that the driveline in these cars are so efficient that even minor power and torque increases translates to significant performance gains. If there was a Turbo 400 trans and a Dana 60 rear in that C6 the mph gains wouldn't have been as significant. These cars are truly amazing. I can't wait to see where the level of performance goes with these C6's. Nick "Kook's headers"
Kooks makes the best headers available for the C5/C6 . The fastest stroker C5 , heads and cam C5 , and nitrous stroker C5 all run Kooks headers , that performance speaks for itself .
6 mph with 22hp???? This makes absolutely no sense.
I hate to be so blunt, but there are some pretty wild claims going around about the mods on C6's. The before and after's just don't add up.
Please give us your thoughts on why it would pick up 6mph with just 22 hp.
A little discussed fact: "Area under the curve" or "Average Power/Torque".
As stated above, the gains are throughout the power band, not just at the peaks. Look at the Dyno chart and you'll see that the headers added horsepower and torque at every point along the power band. Much more area under the curve.
The formula for calculating horsepower from trap speed does not account for increases throughout the power band, just a simple calculation based on race weight and mph.
Just my thoughts. Anyone else?
Last edited by strokster; Oct 12, 2004 at 10:12 AM.
6 mph with 22hp???? This makes absolutely no sense.
I hate to be so blunt, but there are some pretty wild claims going around about the mods on C6's. The before and after's just don't add up.
Please give us your thoughts on why it would pick up 6mph with just 22 hp.
You also have to take into account that part of the gain in ET and MPH is the car was run at two different tracks , on different days , and the car did in fact pick up 6 mph over that last time it was run , the weather , and area under the curve and peak gains all had something to do with it . So it does make sense .
You also have to take into account that part of the gain in ET and MPH is the car was run at two different tracks , on different days , and the car did in fact pick up 6 mph over that last time it was run , the weather , and area under the curve and peak gains all had something to do with it . So it does make sense .
That is part of the problem. When a manufacturer advertises that his product picked up 22 hp, and gained 6mph, he is implying that the product is the reason. The 22 hp I fully believe. The 6 mph I don't. Sure, I understand the car really did pick up 6mph - but the implication that it is due to the headers is what I questioned.
My intent is not to question the value of the headers. I believe they are a good mod, and worth the money.
I guess I'm just becoming a little ornery seeing some claims that don't make sense. No offense to anyone.
You also have to take into account that part of the gain in ET and MPH is the car was run at two different tracks , on different days , and the car did in fact pick up 6 mph over that last time it was run , the weather , and area under the curve and peak gains all had something to do with it . So it does make sense .
But not to the point implied, not a lot of reference to the different tracks. Must be watching the debates.
You also need to consider that a car running 13’s will gain more MPH and lower the ET’s with a 20 HP gain then a 10 second car. The ten second car may only gain 1 tenth and 1 MPH.
I also agree that the gain is across the power band and not a peak only gain.
That is part of the problem. When a manufacturer advertises that his product picked up 22 hp, and gained 6mph, he is implying that the product is the reason. The 22 hp I fully believe. The 6 mph I don't. Sure, I understand the car really did pick up 6mph - but the implication that it is due to the headers is what I questioned.
My intent is not to question the value of the headers. I believe they are a good mod, and worth the money.
I guess I'm just becoming a little ornery seeing some claims that don't make sense. No offense to anyone.
If I take my car to Commerce it would run a 110-111 MPH, Steele it would run a 111-112, then to Reynolds it would be a 113-114. So if I baselined my car at Commerce and ran a 110 mph, then added 22 HP and took it to Reynolds, I'd probably run a 115-116. The 6 mph gain wouldn't be just from the added HP, it would be because I went to a lower altitude track with different grip.
If you are going to post claims, perform your testing in as controled environment as possible, at least go to the same track.
If I take my car to Commerce it would run a 110-111 MPH, Steele it would run a 111-112, then to Reynolds it would be a 113-114. So if I baselined my car at Commerce and ran a 110 mph, then added 22 HP and took it to Reynolds, I'd probably run a 115-116. The 6 mph gain wouldn't be just from the added HP, it would be because I went to a lower altitude track with different grip.
If you are going to post claims, perform your testing in as controled environment as possible, at least go to the same track.
You also have to take into account that part of the gain in ET and MPH is the car was run at two different tracks , on different days , and the car did in fact pick up 6 mph over that last time it was run , the weather , and area under the curve and peak gains all had something to do with it . So it does make sense .
Where is it stated by Dave Bush or Cartek that the numbers were from tow different tracks? I just reviewed the posts and did not see it. Was it "edited" out? Just curious because that little factoid just kinda pops up in Stealth 99's post as quoted above.
In actuality we baselined the car at Etown, and then installed the headers. The next day we ran at Capitol, and then a few days later at Etown. The track results were from the same track (Etown), and with nearly identical weather conditions(the DA was within 50 feet for the different days). We monitor the weather conditions carefully while we test to ensure the most accurate results. I was the only driver for the aforementioned runs. There will always be some variations due to the driver and track prep. I posted my best stock numbers and my best header numbers so everyone can see the results. I do not work for Kooks, and I sell multiple brands of headers. I don’t believe in dyno testing only, you do not race and drive the dyno. I prefer to see real world results.
In actuality we baselined the car at Etown, and then installed the headers. The next day we ran at Capitol, and then a few days later at Etown. The track results were from the same track (Etown), and with nearly identical weather conditions(the DA was within 50 feet for the different days). We monitor the weather conditions carefully while we test to ensure the most accurate results. I was the only driver for the aforementioned runs. There will always be some variations due to the driver and track prep. I posted my best stock numbers and my best header numbers so everyone can see the results. I do not work for Kooks, and I sell multiple brands of headers. I don’t believe in dyno testing only, you do not race and drive the dyno. I prefer to see real world results.
Just a question, do you think the 13.1 @ 109 was a tad slow for a 6 speed car, I'd consider Etown one of the fastest tracks, especially this time of year with the cooler air.
After a lot of testing we picked up 22HP and 22TQ. We used the 1 3/4" headers and high flow cats. Every thing else is stock. On the track we picked up 4 tenths and 6 MPH. They make more power rite off idle and all the way to the rev limiter. This is power you can really feel. The dyno graph will be posted tomorrow.
Just a question, do you think the 13.1 @ 109 was a tad slow for a 6 speed car, I'd consider Etown one of the fastest tracks, especially this time of year with the cooler air.
Yes we do. But as we stated in the first post about our base line, there is a lot of torque management in this car. There are 3 different settings from the factory. Competition mode, traction control off, and traction control and active handling off. They all act differently on the track. We tried all off the different settings and still found the computer holding the car back. We have been developing a module to correct the problem.
When we base lined the car, the weather was hot and humid. The DA was 2100’. Etown is at sea level but the track prep is horrible unless it is a national event. Atco usually has better track prep and is also at sea level. MIR and Cecil in MD and Bradenton in FL are 3 of the fastest tracks I have raced at.
There has been a big weather change hear over the past few weeks and it requires us to rebase line with the current mods, before testing other components. We have gone as fast as 12.3 @117MPH. This is with headers, cats, tstat, fan control module, BFG drag radials, line lock, and experimental torque management eliminator module. The weather was better than our previous runs but we didn’t have any traction. The sixty-foot was a 2.1 and the DA was 920’.