When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This is the first post I have seen that shows a loss with a 2" header on a FI C7. Of course the conditions could have been different also, temps, diff dyno, tuning, ect. I have actually seen posts with gains from 2" vs 1 7/8" on lightly modified C7's. So on goes the 1 7/8 vs 2" debate.
You don't lose on the top end. You lose all under the curve. That's what people fail to realize. In the quarter mile and street driving all that under the curve power and tq gets you moving.
You don't lose on the top end. You lose all under the curve. That's what people fail to realize. In the quarter mile and street driving all that under the curve power and tq gets you moving.
I am with you on the low end loss. I am sure it does move the curve. I am at 800rwhp so any more low end is pretty much useless in my application. What I was questioning was the loss of top end power.
i think im flying for 1 3/4"...135 on 8lbs of boost
i wouldnt put 2 or larger ...fitment is great to
You are goin fast
Should I go 1/34 stepped 1/78 long tube headers from Lg
Or full 1/78 Longtubes
They say straight 1/78 will be better for s/c and the stepped will lose only a bout 8hp up top but gain more down low the stepped turns in to a long tube 1/78 I don't see any reason to not go with the stepped
While still havin top end from the 1/78
If it turns into a long tube
i think im flying for 1 3/4"...135 on 8lbs of boost
i wouldnt put 2 or larger ...fitment is great to
From my experience.
I would use 2 inch before 1 3/4 which is better for an Ls1.
I used 1 3/4 and they ran friggin hot and I gained power and cooler going to 1 7/8's .
From my experience.
I would use 2 inch before 1 3/4 which is better for an Ls1.
I used 1 3/4 and they ran friggin hot and I gained power and cooler going to 1 7/8's .
The Blown 6.2 is best with 1 7/8's or 2 inch.
How u figure..?
I went 135 on 8lbs..
Try this
1 3/4 up to 700 rwhp
1 7/8 up to 900 rwhp
2" 900 and above
Horsepower addicts diid testing to with lt1 and made no gain w 1 7/8 over 1 3/4 700 or less and dont even use headers on z06s
Also i had an ls3 22lbs boost 900 rw w 1 3/4..went to 2 and no gain
Theres not much power in header size period!..nothing ur gonna notice on a drag strip
Last edited by blown81bu; Apr 24, 2016 at 04:45 PM.
How u figure..?
I went 135 on 8lbs..
Try this
1 3/4 up to 700 rwhp
1 7/8 up to 900 rwhp
2" 900 and above
Horsepower addicts diid testing to with lt1 and made no gain w 1 7/8 over 1 3/4 700 or less and dont even use headers on z06s
Also i had an ls3 22lbs boost 900 rw w 1 3/4..went to 2 and no gain
Theres not much power in header size period!..nothing ur gonna notice on a drag strip
Paul, you can't say that considering you didn't get a clean pass with either set of headers. OP, if you are considering any type blower get the 2"
Paul, you can't say that considering you didn't get a clean pass with either set of headers. OP, if you are considering any type blower get the 2"
was on same ecs dyno actually lost torque down low by alot and less power..it was hard to beat LG 1 3/4 long primaries for the c5
true no clean passes either was an issue with trans that i figured out while i was parting car out..u would never believe what i found....
Last edited by blown81bu; Apr 24, 2016 at 07:44 PM.
was on same ecs dyno actually lost torque down low by alot and less power..it was hard to beat LG 1 3/4 long primaries for the c5
true no clean passes either was an issue with trans that i figured out while i was parting car out..u would never believe what i found....
So from your information should I go stepped header from Lg full 1/78
How u figure..?
I went 135 on 8lbs..
Try this
1 3/4 up to 700 rwhp
1 7/8 up to 900 rwhp
2" 900 and above
Horsepower addicts diid testing to with lt1 and made no gain w 1 7/8 over 1 3/4 700 or less and dont even use headers on z06s
Also i had an ls3 22lbs boost 900 rw w 1 3/4..went to 2 and no gain
Theres not much power in header size period!..nothing ur gonna notice on a drag strip
I have used both sizes that's how.
I would dig out my old dyno's where I swapped out 1 3/4 KOOKS with ARH 1 7/8ths and had a size able gain on the same tune at just under the 600 rwhp level.
ARH does use a much better flowing cat than Kooks as well.
My tuner had a hard time with it as well. But not it's worth it. You run what ever you want.
I do wish I would have went 1 7/8's
instead of the 2 inch I have in my office on the floor.
But I'm sure it will work well since I'm going with a pulley.
And a intake filter that flows 680 cfm.
Last edited by 3 Z06ZR1; Apr 25, 2016 at 12:05 AM.
I would dig out my old dyno's where I swapped out 1 3/4 KOOKS with ARH 1 7/8ths and had a size able gain on the same tune at just under the 600 rwhp level.
ARH does use a much better flowing cat than Kooks as well.
My tuner had a hard time with it as well. But not it's worth it. You run what ever you want.
I do wish I would have went 1 7/8's
instead of the 2 inch I have in my office on the floor.
But I'm sure it will work well since I'm going with a pulley.
And a intake filter that flows 680 cfm.
I gained 30 rwhp at 3500 rpms switching from the stock manifolds to 2" headers and a pulley change with the tune untouched. It carried that gain through the power band to 36 rwhp at 5800 rpms. I did gain 1lb of boost with the pulley change so it's hard to tell what just the headers did by themselves. The 2" headers seemed to do fine even in the lower rpm range. Could I have made more power down low with 1 7/8? Maybe. Would it have been significantly more? I doubt it. Again this was with the tune untouched. I was at 715 rwhp at the time.
Last edited by Silverboost; Apr 25, 2016 at 08:58 AM.
I went from 513 to 572 same engine, same car, same dyno, same tune. I changed from Kooks 1 3/4 to 1 7/8's ARH
I also removed the rubber corner boots and hard piped the charge tubes the whole air path. that helped some of it.
I went from 513 to 572 same engine, same car, same dyno, same tune. I changed from Kooks 1 3/4 to 1 7/8's ARH
I also removed the rubber corner boots and hard piped the charge tubes the whole air path. that helped some of it.
I still remember my tuner's own disbelief.
That's a pretty big improvement
Would u go with a stepped header 1/34 turns in to 1/78 or full 1/78
I gained 30 rwhp at 3500 rpms switching from the stock manifolds to 2" headers and a pulley change with the tune untouched. It carried that gain through the power band to 36 rwhp at 5800 rpms. I did gain 1lb of boost with the pulley change so it's hard to tell what just the headers did by themselves. The 2" headers seemed to do fine even in the lower rpm range. Could I have made more power down low with 1 7/8? Maybe. Would it have been significantly more? I doubt it. Again this was with the tune untouched. I was at 715 rwhp at the time.
I am not the person to do the math but I'm sure others could.
If you changed the pulley, how much did mass air flow change? If you did not retune then aren't you just running leaner?
My question is based on the airflow change does that calculate out to 36hp on the pulley change alone without considering the header at all?
I am not the person to do the math but I'm sure others could.
If you changed the pulley, how much did mass air flow change? If you did not retune then aren't you just running leaner?
My question is based on the airflow change does that calculate out to 36hp on the pulley change alone without considering the header at all?
My comparison is not the best one to go by. When I put the headers on untuned it was running lean but it did jump 36 rwhp at 5300 rpms with no tuning changes. At 715rwhp it was pretty much at its limit of fuel supply. Im sure it would have had even better results above 5300 but it was out of gas. I could never get a good tuned number after the header install because there was not enough fuel to go with the HP increase. I then put a single nozzle meth set up on and it jumped 83 rwhp mainly due to the extra fueling.