Update from GM
11-22-2009, 12:08 PM
#41
Drifting
12-21-2009, 08:22 PM
#45
Racer
Member Since: May 2002
Location: Harrison Township Michigan
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was with some engineers today that will be doing some work on new Corvette. They said there will be a big difference in next model.
Will keep us posted
Will keep us posted
12-22-2009, 05:22 PM
#47
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: KADS- If it has wings or an engine, I can break it. Dallas TX
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Sounds like the C7 is just going to be a upgraded C5. Or make that C5.75, Since the C6 was more like C5.5
Let's hope they do better, than that.
I mean, change the grille, seats and transmission and call it a C7................. C'mon man!
Let's hope they do better, than that.
I mean, change the grille, seats and transmission and call it a C7................. C'mon man!
12-22-2009, 09:27 PM
#48
01-01-2010, 12:19 PM
#49
Drifting
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Kettering OH
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cruise-In I Veteran
Cruise-In II Veteran
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10
01-20-2010, 04:39 PM
#51
Melting Slicks
01-20-2010, 05:28 PM
#52
Burning Brakes
02-25-2010, 10:24 AM
#54
Pro
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Heliopolis, Between Cleopatra's Needles
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
2 Posts
In view of GM’s economics in already having borrowed from the Z06 parts bin for the GS in order to turn a buck, no telling whose bin will be next when it comes to the C7, or maybe C8.
Personally would prefer to see the aesthetics of a mid-engine C8 as opposed to the front mount variation on the right – a desecration, imo. A simple nametag switch certainly would prove both an economical solution as well as a captivating consideration for future growth – electrically.
Only time will tell whether GM is insightful enough to measure up for such a sensible change.
IF GM isn't already thinking so, maybe a poll between these two styles would prove interesting.
Personally would prefer to see the aesthetics of a mid-engine C8 as opposed to the front mount variation on the right – a desecration, imo. A simple nametag switch certainly would prove both an economical solution as well as a captivating consideration for future growth – electrically.
Only time will tell whether GM is insightful enough to measure up for such a sensible change.
IF GM isn't already thinking so, maybe a poll between these two styles would prove interesting.
Last edited by QwikC; 02-26-2010 at 08:38 AM.
03-05-2010, 12:49 AM
#55
7th Gear
Member Since: Mar 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great show. the main event was awesome. I can't wait to see how Foghorn deals with Tony. and what wil courage have to do? Snoopy's return & revenge was great.the first match was a great way to start off the show. And the women feuds are going along nicely. Once again, great show.
03-07-2010, 02:34 AM
#57
Team Owner
G'day,
Any word if RHD is planned for the C7? GM will be shooting itself in the foot if it does not look to satisfy this niche, but important market.
When General Motors Holden in Australia was considering introducing the Monaro, a two door version of the Holden Commodore four door sedan, the beancounters told the designers that they would have to sell 6,000 Monaros before a profit was made on them. They ended up selling about 50,000.
Then, when Pontiac wanted a Left Hand Drive version of the Monaro re-badged as a Pontiac GTO, the beancounters said that at least 2,000 LHD coupes would need to be sold before a profit was made. I believe that 30,000 GTOs were sent to the US and Canada.
I know a Monaro is a different car to a Corvette, but the firewall and dashboards of both are not too different from a function perspective.
So, the point is this: how many RHD Corvettes would Bowling Green have to make before they started to show a profit? Is 2,000 about right? If not, what IS the correct figure?
RHD Corvettes would have a ready world market in Great Britain, Ireland, Japan, India, Pakistan, Indonesia, South Africa, New Zealand and Australia, as well as several smaller countries where RHD is the norm.
At a time when the Corvette factory is closed Fridays, and making just over half the cars that they were building only a year or two ago, I just cannot understand why GM are not looking at every possible way to increase the output of Bowling Green. And RHD will increase sales.
Porsche, Ferrari, Audi, BMW, Volkswagen and EVERY other manufacturer in the world builds both LHD and RHD cars and trucks. Every company but Ford America and GM. Maybe that's why Toyota is now the #1 car manufacturer in the world. They listen to what the customer wants.
And this customer is telling GM that he wants a Right Hand Drive Corvette. Why won't they listen?
Regards from Down Under
aussiejohn
3 days to go
Any word if RHD is planned for the C7? GM will be shooting itself in the foot if it does not look to satisfy this niche, but important market.
When General Motors Holden in Australia was considering introducing the Monaro, a two door version of the Holden Commodore four door sedan, the beancounters told the designers that they would have to sell 6,000 Monaros before a profit was made on them. They ended up selling about 50,000.
Then, when Pontiac wanted a Left Hand Drive version of the Monaro re-badged as a Pontiac GTO, the beancounters said that at least 2,000 LHD coupes would need to be sold before a profit was made. I believe that 30,000 GTOs were sent to the US and Canada.
I know a Monaro is a different car to a Corvette, but the firewall and dashboards of both are not too different from a function perspective.
So, the point is this: how many RHD Corvettes would Bowling Green have to make before they started to show a profit? Is 2,000 about right? If not, what IS the correct figure?
RHD Corvettes would have a ready world market in Great Britain, Ireland, Japan, India, Pakistan, Indonesia, South Africa, New Zealand and Australia, as well as several smaller countries where RHD is the norm.
At a time when the Corvette factory is closed Fridays, and making just over half the cars that they were building only a year or two ago, I just cannot understand why GM are not looking at every possible way to increase the output of Bowling Green. And RHD will increase sales.
Porsche, Ferrari, Audi, BMW, Volkswagen and EVERY other manufacturer in the world builds both LHD and RHD cars and trucks. Every company but Ford America and GM. Maybe that's why Toyota is now the #1 car manufacturer in the world. They listen to what the customer wants.
And this customer is telling GM that he wants a Right Hand Drive Corvette. Why won't they listen?
Regards from Down Under
aussiejohn
3 days to go
Because the rest of the F'in world blocks US cars from their homeland as they dump all their crap here and we sit back and let them.
03-07-2010, 11:19 AM
#59
Race Director
In view of GM’s economics in already having borrowed from the Z06 parts bin for the GS in order to turn a buck, no telling whose bin will be next when it comes to the C7, or maybe C8.
Personally would prefer to see the aesthetics of a mid-engine C8 as opposed to the front mount variation on the right – a desecration, imo. A simple nametag switch certainly would prove both an economical solution as well as a captivating consideration for future growth – electrically.
Only time will tell whether GM is insightful enough to measure up for such a sensible change.
IF GM isn't already thinking so, maybe a poll between these two styles would prove interesting.
Personally would prefer to see the aesthetics of a mid-engine C8 as opposed to the front mount variation on the right – a desecration, imo. A simple nametag switch certainly would prove both an economical solution as well as a captivating consideration for future growth – electrically.
Only time will tell whether GM is insightful enough to measure up for such a sensible change.
IF GM isn't already thinking so, maybe a poll between these two styles would prove interesting.
The left one has my vote
03-07-2010, 02:34 PM
#60
Melting Slicks
