When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The whole rear matches up exactly to *** drawing, look at the flow on the bottom diffuser as well as how the lower right cut in goes up just like the drawing.
I am very disappointed and will be keeping my C6 if this is going to be it.
The whole rear matches up exactly to *** drawing, look at the flow on the bottom diffuser as well as how the lower right cut in goes up just like the drawing.
I am very disappointed and will be keeping my C6 if this is going to be it.
You really can't tell. I look forward to seeing the car, if I don't purchase one it will be the economy that stopped me. I hate to see the C6 go, that means that I will no longer have the newest style.
In that one picture of the rear of the spy photo, it looks like the rear has the tail light section recessed a bit so that the bottom of the light assembly is not flush with the bumper below it. Also it looks recessed from the middle section of the rear. That would look pretty hot I think. But then on the side picture the back end looks like one flat slab...
By looking at the pictures closely, I'm not so sure about the round taillights. If you look at the left one here, you can see a silver slash within the round outer covering, looks a lot like the Jalopnik render of square lights.
I agree with Bucky, not quite the completely different change I read Lutz mentioned.
I see it completely different. The entire roof line and B pillars are different. Flat top on the quarters, rear end is less pudgy and more broken up now, more body lines. Not sure what you guys were wanting. It is still a bad economy and they are building a car that sells in small volumes. If you want them to charge 300-400k then you may get a total revamp like you see with those from Italy etc. They have to make business sense of the thing.
Not sure what you guys were wanting. It is still a bad economy and they are building a car that sells in small volumes. If you want them to charge 300-400k then you may get a total revamp like you see with those from Italy etc. They have to make business sense of the thing.
By looking at the pictures closely, I'm not so sure about the round taillights. If you look at the left one here, you can see a silver slash within the round outer covering, looks a lot like the Jalopnik render of square lights.
I agree with Bucky, not quite the completely different change I read Lutz mentioned.
I read somewhere that GM provided the tail lights used on the Corvette Grand-Am proto. Rumor has it they're from the C7
This Corvette testing in the snow has smaller tires than the standard vette. Obviously snow tires are usually reduced in size compared to stock tires but I am wondering if they are attempting to reduce weight overall by having moving to smaller wheels/tires? I hope not.
Not sure what you guys were wanting. It is still a bad economy and they are building a car that sells in small volumes.
Not to be teased with a concept that looked infinitely better. If you're going to wow us with attention to detail and minor changes, sell that, but don't release a concept C7 that looks better than a Lamborghini Aventador and then sell us a car that looks like a C6 with stick-on vents. Like I said in another thread-getting set up on a date with Amy Poehler would be pretty cool, unless you went thinking you were being set up with Alessandra Ambrosio.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.