C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Weight benchmark

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 02:48 PM
  #21  
capevettes's Avatar
capevettes
CF Community Team
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 90 Days
Active Streak: 120 Days
Conversation Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 19,361
Likes: 5,243
From: Cape Cod, Mass.
2025 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2025 C8 Z06/7/E-Ray of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C8 of the Year Finalist Unmodified
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
2019 C1 of Year Winner (performance mods)
2017 Corvette of the Year Finalist
2016 C2 of Year
2015 C3 of Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
Gotta remember that it was in 1958 that GM hung about a million pounds of chrome on each car they built. Before that, not much chrome used. The bumpers on the 53-57's are nothing compared to the bumpers on the 58-62's.
Joe, I've had my 61 on a scale and even with all that chrome and a full steel frame it weighed in at 3042 lbs. I stuffed a 383 stroker in it with about 450 horses. I guess I'm in C7 territory except for the Fred Flinstone handling

The early 6 cylinder cars were slugs but some of the later solid axle cars, especially the fuelies with 4:11's, would run 13's and accelerate to 60 in under 6 seconds. Not bad for that era. The old cars will hold their value alot better than the new ones.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 02:51 PM
  #22  
LS1LT1's Avatar
LS1LT1
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 27,252
Likes: 131
From: Short Hills, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Stingray23
I say 3,075
I just don't think it's possible in this day and age of airbags, door beams and crumple zones along with the 'industry standard' A/C, infotainment systems and sound deadening to get the car much lighter than that.

I'm guessing it could be as low as 3040 and as high as 3130.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 02:54 PM
  #23  
Suns_PSD's Avatar
Suns_PSD
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 8,434
Likes: 411
From: Texas
Default

Technology is amazing. The cars are dramatically safer, faster, emissions, and packed full of goodies and the fact that they can even sniff the weight of a 50 year old car is a blessing.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 03:10 PM
  #24  
adamgl's Avatar
adamgl
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 495
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by ramey
Give me a break. If you actually weigh an 84-87, they are not much more than 3000, WITH 60 POUNDS WORTH OF JACKS, SPARE TIRES and extra crap, which the new ones don't have.

I would bet a small block 65-7 is probably actually under 3000 in some trim as well.

My 70 was under 3000, and that was with 300 extra pounds worth of iron calipers, wheels, and engine parts.

I'd bet ALL of the 50's vettes come in close to or under 3000.

3000 is HEAVY. Not light.

A g machine c1-4, with modern wheels, calipers, coilovers or fiberglass springs, and a modern motor will be in the 26-2800 range, in FULL street trim.

all that is with NO carbon fiber, etc.

you can thank the government for a lot of that BS weight, and then thank fat butts and out of control electrical engineers for the rest.

This car should be sub - 2800, and actually it should be about 7/8 scale and be sub 2600.
Agree completely, Same power and around 2700 lbs. would be awesome.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 03:19 PM
  #25  
1BlueLT1's Avatar
1BlueLT1
Advanced
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 61
Likes: 1
From: NC
Default

Boy a lot of you guys are dreaming. The McLaren F1 was about 2,500 lbs and is about the size of a miata. It used the absolute lightest materials known to man, with a carbon monocoque.

How do you honestly think a 2014 corvette with all of the emissions regulations and safety standards is going to weigh under 3,100?

I'd be shocked if the new car is sub 3,100 REALLY. Trust me i hope it's great, but lets be realistic here.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 03:29 PM
  #26  
KLRBEE2's Avatar
KLRBEE2
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 3
From: Savannah GA
Default

Originally Posted by Torch Z
2900k lbs??? sounds like a locomotive...

Seriously, though, what does this post have to do with anything? Point is, very early Vettes actually were lighter than the '58, albeit way slower. Oh, and the collectors out there will pay MUCH more for a nice example of a '53 than they'll pay for a 2013 ZR-1. So, I guess that's who wants them.
Oops! yeah, you know what I meant. The point is that everyone is so caught up on how this new C7 is goin or not going to be lighter or the lightest vette ever. This I guess is a good topic of conversation, only for bragging rights, IMHO, because the technology and performance far more outweighs (pun intended) the older model.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 03:59 PM
  #27  
rcallen484's Avatar
rcallen484
Thread Starter
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,355
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by ramey
Give me a break. If you actually weigh an 84-87, they are not much more than 3000, WITH 60 POUNDS WORTH OF JACKS, SPARE TIRES and extra crap, which the new ones don't have.

I would bet a small block 65-7 is probably actually under 3000 in some trim as well.

My 70 was under 3000, and that was with 300 extra pounds worth of iron calipers, wheels, and engine parts.

I'd bet ALL of the 50's vettes come in close to or under 3000.

3000 is HEAVY. Not light.

A g machine c1-4, with modern wheels, calipers, coilovers or fiberglass springs, and a modern motor will be in the 26-2800 range, in FULL street trim.

all that is with NO carbon fiber, etc.

you can thank the government for a lot of that BS weight, and then thank fat butts and out of control electrical engineers for the rest.

This car should be sub - 2800, and actually it should be about 7/8 scale and be sub 2600.
You, of course, are wrong on every point. Reminds me of the guy who proclaimed that SCCA would let anyone compete with an automatic transmission. The internet is not perfect but can be a GREAT resource at times.

'84- 3239 lbs
'65- 3230
'70- 3425
'59- 3080
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 04:03 PM
  #28  
jimmyb's Avatar
jimmyb
Race Director
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,934
Likes: 4,257
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by 1BlueLT1
Boy a lot of you guys are dreaming. The McLaren F1 was about 2,500 lbs and is about the size of a miata. It used the absolute lightest materials known to man, with a carbon monocoque.

How do you honestly think a 2014 corvette with all of the emissions regulations and safety standards is going to weigh under 3,100?

I'd be shocked if the new car is sub 3,100 REALLY. Trust me i hope it's great, but lets be realistic here.
McLaren F1 the size of a Miata? Not even close (except weight):

Wheelbase: McLaren 107", Miata 91.7"
Length: McLaren 168.8", Miata 157.3"
Width: McLaren 71.7", Miata 67.7"
Curb Weight: McLaren 2509, Miata 2480

I think that the 3,000 weigh is achievable. All carbon fiber body panels, carbon fiber floor, aluminum frame (all these reported by Car and Driver). The aluminum frame saves well over 100 pounds over the steel frame alone. Anyhow, we'll find out next week.

Jimmy

Last edited by jimmyb; Jan 10, 2013 at 05:35 PM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 04:29 PM
  #29  
c54u's Avatar
c54u
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 694
Default

Originally Posted by rcallen484
Name one lighter than the '58. That is where I got the idea.
I am not sure of the accuracy but here you go.

1955

Curb weight 2750

http://www.vettefacts.com/C1/1955.aspx

Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 04:35 PM
  #30  
JoesC5's Avatar
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 41,732
Likes: 1,718
From: Springfield MO
Default

Originally Posted by Suns_PSD
Technology is amazing. The cars are dramatically safer, faster, emissions, and packed full of goodies and the fact that they can even sniff the weight of a 50 year old car is a blessing.
1950 Crosely Hot Shot(my uncle had one) two seater sports car had a curb weight of 1175 pounds. Just think how it would move with a LS7. Great until you slamed the wall at Taledaga at 162 MPH.

I had a 1946 Crosely sedan while in college. 1151 pounds curb weight.

They had real engineers back then, instead of these today that only know how to use a computer that results in 3200 pound lead sled sports cars.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 04:36 PM
  #31  
JoesC5's Avatar
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 41,732
Likes: 1,718
From: Springfield MO
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
McLaren F1 the size of a Miata? Not even close:

Wheelbase: McLaren 107", Miata 91.7"
Length: McLaren 168.8", Miata 157.3"
Width: McLaren 71.7", Miata 67.7"
Curb Weight: McLaren 2509, Miata 2480

I think that the 3,000 weigh is achievable. All carbon fiber body panels, carbon fiber floor, aluminum frame (all these reported by Car and Driver). The aluminum frame saves well over 100 pounds over the steel frame alone. Anyhow, we'll find out next week.

Jimmy
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 04:40 PM
  #32  
JoesC5's Avatar
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 41,732
Likes: 1,718
From: Springfield MO
Default

Originally Posted by rcallen484
You, of course, are wrong on every point. Reminds me of the guy who proclaimed that SCCA would let anyone compete with an automatic transmission. The internet is not perfect but can be a GREAT resource at times.

'84- 3239 lbs
'65- 3230
'70- 3425
'59- 3080
Ramey is delusional with his weights, especially his 87.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 04:41 PM
  #33  
jimmyb's Avatar
jimmyb
Race Director
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,934
Likes: 4,257
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by ramey
Give me a break. If you actually weigh an 84-87, they are not much more than 3000, WITH 60 POUNDS WORTH OF JACKS, SPARE TIRES and extra crap, which the new ones don't have.

I would bet a small block 65-7 is probably actually under 3000 in some trim as well.

My 70 was under 3000, and that was with 300 extra pounds worth of iron calipers, wheels, and engine parts.

I'd bet ALL of the 50's vettes come in close to or under 3000.

3000 is HEAVY. Not light.

A g machine c1-4, with modern wheels, calipers, coilovers or fiberglass springs, and a modern motor will be in the 26-2800 range, in FULL street trim.

all that is with NO carbon fiber, etc.

you can thank the government for a lot of that BS weight, and then thank fat butts and out of control electrical engineers for the rest.

This car should be sub - 2800, and actually it should be about 7/8 scale and be sub 2600.
3,000 pounds was heavy 40 years ago, not any more. Safety standards have eliminated the flyweight car (except the Lotus Elise which no normal American male can get in). A 2013 Honda Civic EX weighs 2,855 pounds, for pete's sake.

Jimmy
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 04:45 PM
  #34  
jdhommert's Avatar
jdhommert
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 71
From: St. Jacob Illinois
Default

I really shouldn't say this, but anything starting with a 3xxx curb weight will leave me let down. I need to convince myself to be happy with a 30xx weight so I'm either not that let down or estatic when its 29xx
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 04:49 PM
  #35  
John T's Avatar
John T
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 267
From: lisbon ,md,usa
Default

Come hell or high water I am convinced (especially after the remark in today's video) that the C7 will weigh 29xx in some form.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 04:53 PM
  #36  
GenerationX1's Avatar
GenerationX1
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 3
From: Asheville NC
Default

If they can go lighter than a C5Z @ 3115lbs I will be happy and amazed.

So far, since 01 the C5Z has been the lightest vette by far.

My 03 Subaru WRX weighs a 150lbs more than my C5Z.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 05:57 PM
  #37  
Rapid Fred's Avatar
Rapid Fred
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,992
Likes: 1,331
From: Middletown, DE
Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
Gotta remember that it was in 1958 that GM hung about a million pounds of chrome on each car they built. Before that, not much chrome used. The bumpers on the 53-57's are nothing compared to the bumpers on the 58-62's.
Yep -- and as I understand it, they were thinking about fins!!!

That look would have held up well over the years

I think R&T would refer to those days' Detroit styling as "wretched excess"
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Weight benchmark

Old Jan 11, 2013 | 03:01 AM
  #38  
TorqueDriver's Avatar
TorqueDriver
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Westminster Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by John T
Come hell or high water I am convinced (especially after the remark in today's video) that the C7 will weigh 29xx in some form.
That would be outstanding.....since they did make quite a reference to weight conservation in the video.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 04:16 AM
  #39  
LS1LT1's Avatar
LS1LT1
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 27,252
Likes: 131
From: Short Hills, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by John T
Come hell or high water I am convinced (especially after the remark in today's video) that the C7 will weigh 29xx in some form.
I just can't see it being that light.





Originally Posted by GenerationX1
If they can go lighter than a C5Z @ 3115lbs I will be happy and amazed.

So far, since 01 the C5Z has been the lightest vette by far.
I would be ecstatic with any base curb weight under 3100 (30xx range).
Anything under 3050 might even have me placing an order ASAP.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 06:38 PM
  #40  
Blackkaz04's Avatar
Blackkaz04
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 642
Likes: 16
From: East Coast
Default

Originally Posted by rcallen484
^^^ I think you very well may be right and, with their emphasis on every gram earning the right to be there, I think they very well might make it. What a screamer that will be with 450+ hp and a 7 or 8 speed transmission
getting your hopes up wayyy to much. It's GM. They will have to leave room for the next c8 corvette. They can't give us what we all want not. It will be a tad lighter......and a bit faster. that's all.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 AM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE