When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Furrher, curb weight on a c4 includes a jack. A spare tire. A spare tire cover. An old 48 lb battery. A lot of very heavy accessories that have no eauivalent on a c6 or 7.
C6 includes 400hp. Six gears. A stiff and safe structure. Better brakes. More grip. A lot of performance that has no equivalent on a C4.
Your criticism of modern Corvettes as needlessly overweight remains unsupported by evidence.
But if you think an early car weighs 3200+ then you may as well think the world is flat.
Curb weight, it's only a few pounds under that. Or are you calling its chief engineer a liar?
From: Top of the hill, 3rd mailbox on the right. Texas
CF NCM Ambassador
CI 6-7-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10
NCM Member '09
Originally Posted by ramey
Those numbers are not remotely accurate. They are not required to be. The curb weight on an 84 and a 90 are almost the same. But the 90 has radically different and heavier parts, and more of them.
Furrher, curb weight on a c4 includes a jack. A spare tire. A spare tire cover. An old 48 lb battery. A lot of very heavy accessories that have no eauivalent on a c6 or 7. My point was not to debate c4 weight, though i'm the only one so far with true information: my point was that early c4's are just as light as this c7 is likely to be, despite being dinosaurs.
They also have a steel frame. An iron block and engine that weighs 115 lbs more than an ls7. Seats that weigh 45 lbs instead of 30 for a later car. An 85lb hood. Big heavy early cats and heavy exhaust. Headlight motors. A 4+3 that probably weighs as much as a t6060. Yet that car is as light as an aluminum framed, aluminim engine, cf body c6z. Which tells me the later cars are too big and have too much crap all over them.
I'm done discussing c4's on this thread. But if you think an early car weighs 3200+ then you may as well think the world is flat.
I guess no one appreciates my apology earlier, for being a little snappy earlier, but joe, come on down and bring your c6z. I'll prove my point on the scales. Then i'll pour you a good scotch.
They are absolutely required and required to be accurate. Every car sold in the US has a federally mandated Tire and Vehicle Loading plate (now a sticker) on the door edge.
The weight is used for tire certification, for EPA classifications and in some states for tax and licensing purposes.
Newer cars also have more body rigidity, wider thread, larger brakes, better aero, more power and therefore larger supporting parts like diff, axles, transmissions, clutch and so on. Lastly, they don't break down as much and offer more amenities.
I don't see how you can call the difference in weight "crap". Actually point to the things that you feel are crap and add significant body weight.
I appreciate the power as much as anyone... But the powerplant is much lighter than the old small block. The new trans and diff are not any heavier either. I appreciate more tread. But the newer wheels are lighter despite their size. Starting to see my point? None of the improvements add weight. They reduce it. Yet the car is not getting lighter.
The crap includes bumpers standards, air bags all over, the bcm and everything associated with it. Which is roughly 200 pages of the shop manual. With tons of crap like Automatic mirrors, memory seats, sensing lights and climate, ahs, etc., Even Power seats. Does a sports car really need that? I realize some people sort of like that but option it.
They are absolutely required and required to be accurate. Every car sold in the US has a federally mandated Tire and Vehicle Loading plate (now a sticker) on the door edge.
The weight is used for tire certification, for EPA classifications and in some states for tax and licensing purposes.
Incomplete answer. Go look at what they require and get back to me. Or just go put an 84 on a scale. Its really that simple. Dont kill the messenger. I dont know why people just fight the facts. The c7 is lighter than a c6. Ok. Lighter is better. But its still 15% over what it should be IMO, and the simple fact is if its close to 3000 then its not lighter than a lot of pre 1988 vettes, so its hardly something to bragg about. Its just a fact people.
Regardless, the bench mark for weight for me has been the C5Z. From 2001-2013 the C5Z has been the lightest corvette bar none from GM. If the new C7 comes any where close to that or lighter with todays standards it will be a good thing.
Regardless, the bench mark for weight for me has been the C5Z. From 2001-2013 the C5Z has been the lightest corvette bar none from GM. If the new C7 comes any where close to that or lighter with todays standards it will be a good thing.
Agreed. C5z is the best vette made yet. But the looks and interior were not my favorite. And you need a lift to really work on one. Hopefully the c7 will handle as well. Ls7 was a beautiful motor. Lt1 should be great too. We'll see.
I have no idea what the new tranny weighs...i was thinking of c5-6 drivetrain v c4. Those are pretty similar.
True. The various 6 speed manuals are all pretty close in weight, the 6 speed automatic does weigh a bit more than the 4 speed autos in the C4s/C5s/2005 C6s though.
And then of course there were those early C4 4+3 manual transmissions.
If GM lied about the curb weight on the 1984 when they said it was 3192# when it was really under 3000# according to Ramey(LOL), then GM must also be lying about the curb weight on a C6 Z06 and it really weighs 2800#(LOL). That just defies all reasonable thinking as GM wants to be able to say it's high performance sports car is light, so why would they lie and say it's heavier then it really is?
In fact, my 56 is so light, that I have the neighbor's ten year daughter, lift it up so I can change a tire(LOL). GM was lying about it weighing 2875#(LOL). And the only lightweight aluminum pieces in my 56 are the eight pistons and the two tapered shims located between the front cross member and the frame rails to increase caster.
I know that GM was lying when they said my 98 C coupe weighed 3245#. That's only 5# lighter then Mercedes says my 99 Mercedes 4-door sedan weighs. Is Mercedes also lying? Let's see, GM also lied about the 87 C4 coupe weighing 3325. That's heavier then a Mercedes. No way.
Point is, cars do weigh different amounts and the manufacturers do not lie about the curb weights. While my C6 Z06 has bunch of stuff, most mandated by law, that has increased weight over the years, it is still lighter then a C4(and faster).
Ok joe. I owned a c3. 4 c4's. a c5z. A c6z. All were on multiple sets of race scales at scca national events, and subject to scrutiny by real competitors. But you know better because you read a magainze that did not weigh the car and on the internet from sources that did not weigh the car, including an estimated model curb weight rating for *government*!?!?
Now that's a hilarious display of wisdom worth a hearty LOL.
Today has been interesting. I actually like the c7 if i were in the market for a luxo cruiser. But people are talking 3300 pounds and almost 107 inch wheelbase, with a 74 inch wide body. That is almost the size of a 4 door malibu a while back. I think it may still come in lighter than that, but lol, this hi tech beast is still dragging anchors.
Another funny thing to conclude this thread - my corvette spec book shows the curb weight of the 84 - with almost 130 pounds of gas,
A jack, a spare tire, and a completely cast iron motor with a fiberglass body a quarter inch thick and 26lb wheels, as 3152. Now that's funny. I guess the books arent that far off after all if you know where to look. Its got a smog pump. An egr system. Mechanical cruise control. A 35 pound old starter. Of course steel frame and heavy seats. Pop up lights.
Put a modern battery and wheels, take out the spare and jack, and with a few gallons of gas, that car is 2940 apples to apples. Put an lt1 in it and its 2800! What the hell is gm packing into the c7 to find 500 pounds of useless aluminum and cf? I just dont get it.
I just don't get how you can not get it. Drive over diagonal railroad tracks some time. Look at a 30mph crash some time. Or a rollover. Maybe actually read a book. Until then there is no helping you.
I appreciate the power as much as anyone... But the powerplant is much lighter than the old small block. The new trans and diff are not any heavier either. I appreciate more tread. But the newer wheels are lighter despite their size. Starting to see my point? None of the improvements add weight. They reduce it. Yet the car is not getting lighter.
The crap includes bumpers standards, air bags all over, the bcm and everything associated with it. Which is roughly 200 pages of the shop manual. With tons of crap like Automatic mirrors, memory seats, sensing lights and climate, ahs, etc., Even Power seats. Does a sports car really need that? I realize some people sort of like that but option it.
How about the extra mass for added downforce, cooling ducts, better oil delivery under high lateral forces, wider tires, stiffer chassis?
I would also be down for a "light weight" base model where they would get rid of power seats and things. Unfortunately, that's not how GM's business model works. I think they try to provide the most car for $50k. They will add some of these amenities simply because they are low cost and high return or other competitors offer them as base.
I just don't get how you can not get it. Drive over diagonal railroad tracks some time. Look at a 30mph crash some time. Or a rollover. Maybe actually read a book. Until then there is no helping you.
jinx. you are having real trouble. the point of this thread is that the c6z and c7 have a much LIGHTER body and frame, wheels and engine, which components are superior in every way to a c4's equivalent. the body, frame, wheels and engine in the c7 together weigh *at least* 400 pounds LESS than those components of a c4. probably 500. Yet the CAR is so large, and so packed so full of other useless garbage that the c7 not only does not weigh 400 pounds less than a c4, but it actually looks like it is going to weigh 200 pounds MORE!
That is the problem.
PS, I've seen all manner of c4's rolled and wrecked. they actually hold up extremely well. i don't know why, they are barely held together to start with. maybe its' that whole 'flexible baby' thing.