When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It doesn't require the cow catcher. Various interpretations of the requirements will arrive at the same conclusions. The first benefit of lower fascia reinforcement is that it will cause the leg to flex below the knee and direct the pedestrian toward the car rather than damaging (seriously understated) the knee and potentially trapping the pedestrian under the bumper protrusion.
The specific shape can also be used to direct the pedestrian towards a spot on the hood which will inflict the least amount of damage (due to flex of the hood) to the cranium.
There is of course an aero benefit of the specific shapes as well in that they will offset drag induced lift components from the rear of the car by acting as dive planes at the lowest frontal area of the fascia.
Thanks for the information. However, is this really a problem that required corrective action? Is this only required for low-profile sports cars or all cars in general?
Thanks for the information. However, is this really a problem that required corrective action? Is this only required for low-profile sports cars or all cars in general?
Easy now. If you go applying that kind of logic to government regulations. . . . you'll go crazy.
However, is this really a problem that required corrective action?
Oh, of course it is....the government certainly wouldn't waste your tax dollars researching & regulating it, mandating that the auto manufacturers incorporate the "fix" into their vehicles, and ultimately making you pay more for your car if it wan't necessary!
Last edited by Ron78Z&66Vette; Feb 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM.
I think those pointy things are there so when a dumb @$$ fooling with a phone walks in front of oncoming traffic you can scoop his @$$ up over the car instead of just running over the top of him.
I think those pointy things are there so when a dumb @$$ fooling with a phone walks in front of oncoming traffic you can scoop his @$$ up over the car instead of just running over the top of him.
I believe the pointy fangs are just one solution to meeting the federal regulations, not the only solution. Looking at other new cars, that also have to meet the same federal regulations, most do not have the pointy fangs.
There was a Jeep positioned behind the C7 in the video clip Q&A with Harlan Charles. It did not have the pointy fangs, and from the floor to the bottom of the bumper, one could run over Rosie O'Donnell and never notice it.
As I understand it, there is a new DOT or governement regulation that has to do with pedestrian safety which mandates that all new 2013 or 2014 vehicles and up have some sort of protrusion at the lower facia. Whether its a bumper or something like we see above as well as on the C7. As a result, I would expect most cars without bumpers at the base of the front facia to have something similar. There are only so many ways to skin the cat and as such, I would expect many of the new cars will have similar "fang" looking protrusions down low.
That or GM just copied Honda because the Civic is so cool!
The fangs in the civic looks way better. It actually blends into the car unlike the Vette.
The fangs in the civic looks way better. It actually blends into the car unlike the Vette.
REALLY? A Civic.? That has to be a joke. You can not be serious..
If you are serious do not wear glasses when you date, you may scare the heck out of yourself!
HEY OP You are missing the point, the fangs will only clip the strippers heels in you avatar, she will live to dance another day. Trade in a C5,C6 on a C7 and you may save a stripper, 4 year old brake grabber, or a cat.
Last edited by CitationZ06@yahoo; Feb 12, 2013 at 11:19 AM.