When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Someone help me understand how a C7 Z51 that weighs more than a C6 Z51 goes as fast as a Z06 (that is lighter than both of 'em) 0-60, with 55 LESS horsepower than the aluminum framed Z06.
If There is a high school nearby a Physics teacher can help
The variables are enormous this is not hard maybe make a list of them
Over
Originally Posted by 60av8tor
Someone help me understand how a C7 Z51 that weighs more than a C6 Z51 goes as fast as a Z06 (that is lighter than both of 'em) 0-60, with 55 LESS horsepower than the aluminum framed Z06.
Someone help me understand how a C7 Z51 that weighs more than a C6 Z51 goes as fast as a Z06 (that is lighter than both of 'em) 0-60, with 55 LESS horsepower than the aluminum framed Z06.
The 0-60 test is really pointless and tells very little about overall power. What's likely going on here is: the C7's tires have more grip and therefore can provide a better platform for launch. Also the C7 has a slight rearward weight bias (woo hoo!) which will also help with the launch.
Someone help me understand how a C7 Z51 that weighs more than a C6 Z51 goes as fast as a Z06 (that is lighter than both of 'em) 0-60, with 55 LESS horsepower than the aluminum framed Z06.
WTF, over ?
Yes because weight and power are the only factors involved...
Last edited by JustinStrife; Jun 20, 2013 at 02:29 PM.
Someone help me understand how a C7 Z51 that weighs more than a C6 Z51 goes as fast as a Z06 (that is lighter than both of 'em) 0-60, with 55 LESS horsepower than the aluminum framed Z06.
WTF, over ?
First it's 45 hp less and only 5 FT LBS (w/NPP) less tq. The rest is traction and suspension.
“The new Stingray constantly communicates feedback to the driver, which makes you feel incredibly confident behind the wheel,” said Jim Mero, Corvette vehicle dynamics engineer. “That confidence encourages you to attack each corner because the Stingray drives so well: the tire grip is incredible; the steering response is some of the best I’ve ever experienced; the Magnetic Ride dampers allow little body roll through the corner, while still soaking up the rumble strips when you clip the apex,” he said. “It’s just addictive on the track
Someone help me understand how a C7 Z51 that weighs more than a C6 Z51 goes as fast as a Z06 (that is lighter than both of 'em) 0-60, with 55 LESS horsepower than the aluminum framed Z06.
Someone help me understand how a C7 Z51 that weighs more than a C6 Z51 goes as fast as a Z06 (that is lighter than both of 'em) 0-60, with 55 LESS horsepower than the aluminum framed Z06.
WTF, over ?
We had these same threads when the GTR debuted and posted numbers that seemed other worldly and give C6 Z06 owners fits. Technology is a beautiful thing: more with less.
Someone help me understand how a C7 Z51 that weighs more than a C6 Z51 goes as fast as a Z06 (that is lighter than both of 'em) 0-60, with 55 LESS horsepower than the aluminum framed Z06.
OK - pay attention:
First you get yourself some thick white smoke - then you're gonna need several very large mirrors - with practice and using said devices, you can make almost anything appear to be/do anything . . . also good on occasion to signal the election of new Pope
Last edited by michaelinmech; Jun 20, 2013 at 03:06 PM.
Apples to apples (1st yr to 1st yr), those numbers I posted were from GM’s initial 2005 test as stated in the table for the first year C6Z (2006). However, after some digging, I found GM's 2006 Z06 Performance Numbers announcement, and it is 3.7 sec 0-60. Anyhow, last I understood of mathematics, 3.7 is lower than 3.8.
What will be interesting is what numbers the car mags and internet testers come up with.
Last edited by Minkster; Jun 20, 2013 at 03:44 PM.
Apples to apples (1st yr to 1st yr), those numbers I posted were from GM’s initial 2005 test as stated in the table for the first year C6Z (2006). However, after some digging, I found GM's 2006 Z06 Performance Numbers announcement, and it is 3.7 sec 0-60. Anyhow, last I understood of mathematics, 3.7 is lower than 3.8.
What will be interesting is what numbers the car mags and internet testers come up with.
GM has to provide numbers that show their latest is better than what it replaces.
For example, GM said the C5 coupe has a .29 Cd.
They had to better that with the C6, so GM says the C6 coupe has a Cd of .287.
But, Independent tests of both the C5 and the C6 in a wind tunnel in NC that is used by the NASCAR teams(and others) showed that the C6 actually has a higher Cd than the C5 and neither one of then were below .33 Cd.
GM has to provide numbers that show their latest is better than what it replaces.
For example, GM said the C5 coupe has a .29 Cd.
They had to better that with the C6, so GM says the C6 coupe has a Cd of .287.
But, Independent tests of both the C5 and the C6 in a wind tunnel in NC that is used by the NASCAR teams(and others) showed that the C6 actually has a higher Cd than the C5 and neither one of then were below .33 Cd.
Different wind tunnels could yield different results. A static one might be different from one with rollers in which the aerodynamic forces of wheel motion might come into play. Sport Auto put the C6 inside of DiamlerChrysler's wind tunnel, which they do for all of their supertests. That C6 recorded a Cd of 0.29, which is below 0.33 and close enough to the claim.
Computers...same way the GTR is faster than the ZR1
This is very misleading. The GTR is "faster" from 0-60 because of the AWD; it can put the power down quicker than the corvette which only has two power wheels. But go beyond the quarter mile and engage in racing with turns and stretches longer than 2000 ft and the GTR takes a very far back seat to the corvette.
This is very misleading. The GTR is "faster" from 0-60 because of the AWD; it can put the power down quicker than the corvette which only has two power wheels. But go beyond the quarter mile and engage in racing with turns and stretches longer than 2000 ft and the GTR takes a very far back seat to the corvette.
The GTR is easy to drive in the twisties due to the computer doing all the work.
To say it takes a "very far back seat", that's absurd.