When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Trust me...unless he assaulted someone..or stole repeatedly from GM...he will be back...only a temp dismissal...having been employed with GM...BOTH HOURLY and SALARIED (14yrs) FOR OVER 32 YEARS...he will be back if he doesnt choose retirement with 40 years seniority. UAW may give up something in it's negotiating at the plant level table ...but he will be back! It's nearly IMPOSSIBLE to be fired from GM!
Unbelievable. Kinda like working for the government, if you do a bad job that's okay. Stupid a company cannot fire people...hate union tactics. Reward poor employees.
On his Facebook page on Monday, Renaud, who could not be reached for comment today, posted: “I hope GM’s CEO Mary Barra has the fortitude to clean up GM’s weak management team. We can only build the cars GM engineers give us to build. Management needs the workers now more than ever to help catch problems before they become billion dollar recalls.”
That pretty tame. Hard to imagine this would violate the CBA to justify a termination. I've head many a union rep say much worse about management at press conferences over the years.
I'm guessing he had a major blow-up with management that resulted in allegations of "insubordination". As others have mentioned, the CBA governs discipline, and I'd expect there will be a hearing and appeals,... There's literally a hundred years of authority on union shop discipline with attorneys spending their entire careers doing only that.
Unbelievable. Kinda like working for the government, if you do a bad job that's okay. Stupid a company cannot fire people...hate union tactics. Reward poor employees.
On his Facebook page on Monday, Renaud, who could not be reached for comment today, posted: “I hope GM’s CEO Mary Barra has the fortitude to clean up GM’s weak management team. We can only build the cars GM engineers give us to build. Management needs the workers now more than ever to help catch problems before they become billion dollar recalls.”
That pretty tame. Hard to imagine this would violate the CBA to justify a termination. I've head many a union rep say much worse about management at press conferences over the years.
I'm guessing he had a major blow-up with management that resulted in allegations of "insubordination". As others have mentioned, the CBA governs discipline, and I'd expect there will be a hearing and appeals,... There's literally a hundred years of authority on union shop discipline with attorneys spending their entire careers doing only that.
Dunno, social media holds a special place in the hearts off some employers, when I was with a car mfr, I had to sign an agreement that I would not post ANYTHING regarding the mfr on any social site, even if it was "I love this company" , will be interesting to see if this was partly the case, of course we'll really never know....
As union member for 38 years for a green tractor co. a new tranny had a defect and I would build it got 30 days off for some young punks with a piece of paper that says he he is a Eng. Well 10 days later i got called back and made enough to on Ot. to trade for a 2014
To answer the OP, no there will not be a strike over this.
To respond to some statements about the "impossibility" of firing a union employee, the difference between a union and a non-union employee is management can discipline a union covered employee for "just cause" which to means there must be a reason for the discipline. A non-union employee may be disciplined per management whim as long as the discipline does not violate various state and federal labor laws.
Union covered employees have been and will be disciplined and fired and these action are often upheld by the arbiter. There is no "get out of jail" card for any employee whether union or non-union.
Ah here it comes the same tired old refrain about unions. You don't know ANYTHING about the situation and are not privy to the facts. Union bashing accomplishes nothing and is not relevant today.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Trust me...unless he assaulted someone..or stole repeatedly from GM...he will be back...only a temp dismissal...having been employed with GM...BOTH HOURLY and SALARIED (14yrs) FOR OVER 32 YEARS...he will be back if he doesnt choose retirement with 40 years seniority. UAW may give up something in it's negotiating at the plant level table ...but he will be back! It's nearly IMPOSSIBLE to be fired from GM!
Nearly impossible to be fired in ANY union setting. Ask dedicated, good workers in a union company what they hate about the union and they will say that their union protects those who do not deserve it.
Nearly impossible to be fired in ANY union setting. Ask dedicated, good workers in a union company what they hate about the union and they will say that their union protects those who do not deserve it.
Partially true but when one of the nay-sayers gets in trouble they have no difficulty going to the union. Am I the only one to notice the decline in the middle class income exactly parallels the decline in union membership?
Partially true but when one of the nay-sayers gets in trouble they have no difficulty going to the union. Am I the only one to notice the decline in the middle class income exactly parallels the decline in union membership?
Laborsmith
Think about this question seriously, because I'm not trying to be a jerk here... It's a serious question.
Do you think the decline in union membership numbers has anything to do with companies being forced to shut down operations and send manufacturing jobs out of the country because they can no longer be competitive using North American labour?
No, I do not. Profit had everything to do with it. Shops were closed, true, but only marginally or reasons to do with the cost of North American labor.
Two points: here in Michigan WalMart has one major competitor: Meijers. The employyes of one of those two are unionized and the other company's employees are not. Both by all appearances are successful with the family owners of the former among the richest in the nation and of the latter the richest in Michigan.
The second point: tool&dye and machinest work is returning stateside. Training programs for this work are being started here in Michigan and likely in other states. Productivity has a lot more to do with this reversal than the hourly wage rate.
But if one can not tell from my forum name, I am an advocate for employee rights and as a consequence I am pro labor organization.
No, I do not. Profit had everything to do with it. Shops were closed, true, but only marginally or reasons to do with the cost of North American labor.
Two points: here in Michigan WalMart has one major competitor: Meijers. The employyes of one of those two are unionized and the other company's employees are not. Both by all appearances are successful with the family owners of the former among the richest in the nation and of the latter the richest in Michigan.
The second point: tool&dye and machinest work is returning stateside. Training programs for this work are being started here in Michigan and likely in other states. Productivity has a lot more to do with this reversal than the hourly wage rate.
But if one can not tell from my forum name, I am an advocate for employee rights and as a consequence I am pro labor organization.
Laborsmith
Although you do have some valid points, it's not that simple. From my perspective, (and I'm guessing you can tell from my stance I do deal with unions at work, 3 in fact) unions although positive in some ways for worker wage rates and protection, are disruptful to productivity, and increase operating costs to employers. The amount of money that employers pay into union funds which none of the workers see the benefits of is massive.
Bottom line, from where I see it, unions served a very valuable purpose when labour law and government regulated H&S standards did not exist. I studied labour history and labour law in university. They now have become redundant and simply add costs to industry.
Now I know I'm not going to change your mind, and I won't try, but what I am saying is I DO have a great deal of experience dealing with unions in negotiations of contracts and even creating new contracts, as well as dealing with disciplinary issues and grievances. I do understand how unions work and the costs associated. It is not as simple as "unions are good for everyone." They definitely CAN and in many cases do hurt industry.
My 2 cents saw employees fire themselves because of contracts that they worked under. You can't keep not showing up for work or be on sick leave, and running a road race. Will not go into detail about my experience in this area. I see both sides and agree with both sides of this discussion in certain areas, those without personal experience should refrain from comment, if they are basing what they know on hearsay or newspaper reporting.
z51vett
Doug
No, I do not. Profit had everything to do with it. Shops were closed, true, but only marginally or reasons to do with the cost of North American labor.
Two points: here in Michigan WalMart has one major competitor: Meijers. The employyes of one of those two are unionized and the other company's employees are not. Both by all appearances are successful with the family owners of the former among the richest in the nation and of the latter the richest in Michigan.
The second point: tool&dye and machinest work is returning stateside. Training programs for this work are being started here in Michigan and likely in other states. Productivity has a lot more to do with this reversal than the hourly wage rate.
But if one can not tell from my forum name, I am an advocate for employee rights and as a consequence I am pro labor organization.
My 2 cents saw employees fire themselves because of contracts that they worked under. You can't keep not showing up for work...
ask any union cultist... "how many bad employees - did your union - assist the company in firing" ?
you'll get the deer-in-headlights look in return.
If you're a good worker, you don't need a union. If you find yourself working for a bad company... you can take your skills and work-ethic to another company - who would gladly hire you.
I was raised in a pro-union family; finally got myself out of the cult... and now see things as they really are.