When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
In addition to Local 2164 members approving a strike, it also must be approved by the regional and national UAW leaders before Corvette workers would actually walk off the job.
Spokeswoman Andrea Hales confirmed that Renaud is no longer employed at the plant. Renaud had no comment when contacted Thursday morning by WKU Public Radio. He served as the local UAW president since 1982 and had been a GM employee for more than 40 years.
Renaud had been critical of Plant Manager Dave Tatman, who resigned abruptly in February. In April, the union voted to authorize a strike if the plant didn’t resolve some safety and quality issues. A strike never occurred.
Renaud also served as Bowling Mayor from 1996 to 2000.
I don't see a need for an hysterical over reaction a to small piece of news where one may be drawing inaccurate dramatic conclusions. Until you hear otherwise, I'd relax and enjoy looking forward to my new vette's arrival.
Oh great, here we go...things are going to start missing on cars going down the line.
Ah yes, the union way, how 1960's.
I'll bite my tongue on what I really thing about unions.
Ah here it comes the same tired old refrain about unions. You don't know ANYTHING about the situation and are not privy to the facts. Union bashing accomplishes nothing and is not relevant today.
Oh great, here we go...things are going to start missing on cars going down the line.
Ah yes, the union way, how 1960's.
I'll bite my tongue on what I really thing about unions.
Try "How 1890s"...
I will bite my tongue as well but, know that I'm thinking the same thing you are.
In regards to the original question... If GM had a legit reason for letting this guy go (which they most likely did since it's next to impossible to get rid of a Union employee without MULTIPLE steps of progressive discipline) Union workers would not have a legal or justified reason to strike. The grievance procedure in EVERY union contract is very specific and must be followed before any other actions are taken, such as strikes.
They have a contract, why would they strike ? People for many reasons get fired every day, does that mean if a person gets fires (head of union or not) should the rest of the company strike ?
Well this certainly will concern all of us who have cars on order. Very sad indeed.
Why would it concern you and why is it sad?
BGAP will continue to build cars and this 40 year veteran of GM will live happily every after on his Union pension assuming he can keep his mouth shut.
Interesting. Experienced union officers are used to walking that line but seldom cross over without giving hard thought to the consequences.
Now I need to start a search.
And yes, dismissals are grievable and in the UAW go to an Umpire if not resolved.
And progressive discipline is what the words describe: if you are consistently late you have a right to be told (warned) you must be on time or face further discipline. If you are insubordinate you have the right to contest the consequence (being fired) before a third party independent adjudicating officer: Umpire, Arbitrator, Administrative Law Judge, etc. with no requirement of warning, pending the egregiousness of the insubordinate act.
Interesting. Experienced union officers are used to walking that line but seldom cross over without giving hard thought to the consequences.
Now I need to start a search.
And yes, dismissals are grievable and in the UAW go to an Umpire if not resolved.
And progressive discipline is what the words describe: if you are consistently late you have a right to be told (warned) you must be on time or face further discipline. If you are insubordinate you have the right to contest the consequence (being fired) before a third party independent adjudicating officer: Umpire, Arbitrator, Administrative Law Judge, etc. with no requirement of warning, pending the egregiousness of the insubordinate act.
Laborsmith
Trust me...unless he assaulted someone..or stole repeatedly from GM...he will be back...only a temp dismissal...having been employed with GM...BOTH HOURLY and SALARIED (14yrs) FOR OVER 32 YEARS...he will be back if he doesnt choose retirement with 40 years seniority. UAW may give up something in it's negotiating at the plant level table ...but he will be back! It's nearly IMPOSSIBLE to be fired from GM!