When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
And don't forget about the insurance savings! Oh, never mind
My insurance, with the same coverage, only went up $21 every six month, so that really didn't come into consideration. I was really surprised, but I am a "senior" driver, drive less that 10K miles per year and have never had an accident or ticket. Been with State Farm for 30 years.
Yeah, I had done all of the math before I left the Camry for the the C7. Even at worst case scenario it is worth it.
As for my wife's involvement, I wouldn't have it any other way. Call me what you will, but I really do care about her opinion. Go ahead, flame away.
I wasn't flaming, I was asking because you just threw the comment into the post seemingly randomly and then never said anything other than she cares. It just seemed random that's all.
Haven't had the '14 on an extended trip since driving 800 miles from the dealer when I bought it in Aug and that doesn't count, but my '08 got 29.5 mpg on our honey moon to Charleston in '09 and my '09 Z06 got 28.5 to the NCM in 2011. Always got about 18mpg around town with both.
Haven't had the '14 on an extended trip since driving 800 miles from the dealer when I bought it in Aug and that doesn't count, but my '08 got 29.5 mpg on our honey moon to Charleston in '09 and my '09 Z06 got 28.5 to the NCM in 2011. Always got about 18mpg around town with both.
Last October, a group of us went to New Mexico on a 2500 mile cruise. A 2014 C7(broken in) coupe with Z51 and M7 averaged 29.2 MPG(DIC) for the entire trip and I averaged 27.7(DIC) in my C6 Z06. Same speeds, same gas, same weather, same roads, same traffic, etc., so it was a very good comparison between the two cars.
For fun, let's run this to ground (for the math purists out there, yes the numbers are rounded off and my estimates will most certainly vary):
C7 = 17mpg
Camry Hybrid = 35mpg
Delta = 18mpg
Estimate of annual miles driven: 15,000
Estimate of average fuel prices $2.50
Annual fuel cost difference between C7 and Camry = $1,133 year or about $94 month.
Putt-putt your C7 along in ECO mode @ 28.7mpg and the C7/Camry fuel cost difference lessens to: $235/year, or $19.58 a month. So, fuel cost difference wise, for what amounts to probably less than you'd spend for a monthly visit to Pizza Hut, you're driving a C7.
Now... let's talk fun factor:
C7 vs Camry?
Thank you for the cost accounting. That is a useful model
Drove from Los Angeles to San Diego yesterday (probably at slightly above the posted speed limit - okay, maybe a little more than slightly over ). Anyway, got over 31 MPG heading toward San Diego, drove around the town a little bit, and headed back. Ended up with 28.5 MPG when I pulled her into the garage. Love it!
For fun, let's run this to ground (for the math purists out there, yes the numbers are rounded off and my estimates will most certainly vary):
C7 = 17mpg
Camry Hybrid = 35mpg
Delta = 18mpg
Estimate of annual miles driven: 15,000
Estimate of average fuel prices $2.50
Annual fuel cost difference between C7 and Camry = $1,133 year or about $94 month.
Putt-putt your C7 along in ECO mode @ 28.7mpg and the C7/Camry fuel cost difference lessens to: $235/year, or $19.58 a month. So, fuel cost difference wise, for what amounts to probably less than you'd spend for a monthly visit to Pizza Hut, you're driving a C7.
Now... let's talk fun factor:
C7 vs Camry?
I agree Rave, the fun factor more than makes up for the mpg difference. Both cars have their place in the market, and for personal preference. I rented a Camry for a long trip several years ago. The car preformed flawlessly, and returned great mpgs. But, talk about a boring, utilitarian ride. They just ain't for me.
My 15 Z51 A8 is good but not as good as my 05 M6. Luckily I don't care My wife doesn't care either! But then again she rides a Canam Spider and Flys her own airplane, she's a keeper!
I am sure that many people here don't care what the fuel efficiency is on our C7s but my wife certainly does....I gave up my Camry Hybrid that got 35+ mpg.
Anyway, around town in sport mode I get around 17-18 mpg and I think that's probably pretty normal. Today I made a 200 mile interstate highway trip in Energy mode and I got 28.7 mpg. For the most part I was running 70 mph in 7th gear @1500 rpm. Honestly I am impressed.
I know there are people that say, "Drive it like you stole it" or, "Don't be such a wimp", but I keep my sport/track mode for the surface streets. I don't see the need to be in anything other than Energy mode when cruising down the interstate, and it's easier on the wallet.
I know I'm going to love the mileage! My CTS-V coupe has an average mileage over 4 years of 13 MPG. Best I ever got on the highway was 18.8. I don't want to know what I get in town! Oh course, my foot may be a little heavy....I'm just sayin......
Did a trip from WI to KY and from KY to WI over 500 miles each way.
Did not use cruse control.
But held it constant at 5 MPG over posted speed limits.
Eco mode did NOT increase MPG.
Results: Down - WI to KY 29.5
Up - KY to WI 32.2
Avg - 30.8
My best one yet.
Did a number of 27s 28s, 29s, and 30s, but the one back home was like, totally WOW factor in spades.
My Honda car and truck does not do this good.
Now, lets see what happens when the Lingenfelter engine is used.
I know I'm going to love the mileage! My CTS-V coupe has an average mileage over 4 years of 13 MPG. Best I ever got on the highway was 18.8. I don't want to know what I get in town! Oh course, my foot may be a little heavy....I'm just sayin......
That's about what my Z06 gets in sport Quite bad.
But in Eco and sleepy driving to work driving, it's more like 16 city. At 70+ eco doesn't help in 7th gear, but I think if I could resist zooms, it would get about 24.
The primary benefit of Eco seems to be at slower cruising speeds. High 20's might be possible in the 50's, but ain't no way I'm driving this car that slow for long periods of time
I noticed the same thing. When monitoring the Instantaneous MPG mode I can't tell any difference between ECO and Tour modes, also the little bump the C7 engine makes when switching between V4 and V8 modes bugs me a little bit so I just leave mine in Tour most of the time. Well..., unless I find myself on twisty roads.
From: Between Forest Lake and White Bear Lake in the Land of 10,000+ lakes
Per my DIC with 1385 miles with a M7, in Sport mode 98% of the time and shifting around 2500-3000 RPM's during normal driving, I have averaged 21.2 MPG so far driving around town about 80% of the time.
I am sure that many people here don't care what the fuel efficiency is on our C7s but my wife certainly does....I gave up my Camry Hybrid that got 35+ mpg.
Anyway, around town in sport mode I get around 17-18 mpg and I think that's probably pretty normal. Today I made a 200 mile interstate highway trip in Energy mode and I got 28.7 mpg. For the most part I was running 70 mph in 7th gear @1500 rpm. Honestly I am impressed.
I know there are people that say, "Drive it like you stole it" or, "Don't be such a wimp", but I keep my sport/track mode for the surface streets. I don't see the need to be in anything other than Energy mode when cruising down the interstate, and it's easier on the wallet.
I did about 125 miles of "gentle cruising" yesterday. Variable speeds from 35 to 60 in Economy Mode. Tender foot. Weather about 55 degrees. I averaged 28.5 MPG. My computer jives very closely with fill up calcs. Since much of my drive was in less than 8th gear, I believe that on a steady 60 to 70 MPH run, I will get pretty close to 30 MPG. I think it is incredible, and brag about it as much as all the other wonderful things this car does. There is no other car in the world that I know of that has this combination of raw brute power when needed, and economy when not. Not at any price.
PS: That is better mileage than our 72 VW Super Beetle ever got.
Looking at this site and others, I seem to be noticing a trend.
But I am not sure if it is real.
It seems that the Z06's are consistently not getting the MPG that the Z51 or standard C7 package is getting. A couple MPG drop at highway speeds seems to be going on, but not sure.
The Z06 is about 650/650 if I recall (somewhere in that range??) the Z51 is lower, in the 465 range if I recall???
So does the Z06 supercharger take that much additional power from the engine when in cruising mode? I can see this much and more of a drop if the foot is a bit heavy, but why should the MPG drop this much when in a flat cursing mode at 70 MPH?
Also, the Z06 supercharger looks a lot like the Edelbrock one. Does Edelbrock make the Z06 unit? Anyone know?